Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2018, 07:29 AM
 
828 posts, read 647,527 times
Reputation: 973

Advertisements

DC, and to a bit lesser extent, Los Angeles. Atlanta has the potential to be there too, but really isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2018, 07:32 AM
 
617 posts, read 551,568 times
Reputation: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDFan View Post
DC, and to a bit lesser extent, Los Angeles. Atlanta has the potential to be there too, but really isn't.
Atlanta may not be the best example, BUT things are changing and quickly!

https://atlanta.curbed.com/2018/1/30...s-status-check
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 09:28 AM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,568,287 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Transit oriented development.

Ironically if you google the term, links and pictures and wiki-pedia comes up with references to Arlington, VA and places alike.
thanx;
i think this poll is a similar question:
https://www.city-data.com/forum/city-...ng-cities.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,299,392 times
Reputation: 6917
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Ironically meaning my claim of DC suburbs being IMO the best example. Although I know others fit the criteria.
Ok, thanks, I understand what you mean. I was thrown off by the use of the word "ironically" because that's not ironic. It's a coincidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 12:18 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,709,275 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Ok, thanks, I understand what you mean. I was thrown off by the use of the word "ironically" because that's not ironic. It's a coincidence.
Yeah, not to harp on resident since it’s a commonly misused word, but “ironic†makes no sense in that context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,299,392 times
Reputation: 6917
For fun's sake, I'll throw Jersey City into the ring of contenders. Through most of the 20th century, Jersey City's waterfront was mostly rail yards and docks. In the 1980s, mixed-use development began, continued through the 1990s, and exploded in the 2000s and 2010s. All of it has been fueled by transit access to NYC via the PATH rail system and ferries, and in 2000 a light rail system opened connecting other waterfront nodes to PATH and to other locations.

Since 2000, over 25,000 residential units, a couple million square feet of office space, and retail (not sure the square footage of retail) have been developed on the JC waterfront. There's about 37,600 residential units in the pipeline (planned, approved, or under construction) citywide, most of which is in clusters near PATH and LRT stations.

The change from 2000: http://davidselvey.com/imgs/1994%20M...tc/94%2090.jpg
http://image.nj.com/home/njo-media/w...5672cad5e.jpeg

to now:https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...re-id923968652
https://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/up...ey-skyline.jpg

is pretty remarkable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,047 posts, read 13,920,856 times
Reputation: 5198
NYC Staten Island, Parts of Queens and The Bronx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
929 posts, read 1,902,079 times
Reputation: 554
What do you guys think about Vancouver, BC in Canada as far as TOD? I personally think TOD around skytrain stations in Vancouver is superior to TOD around metro stations in DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,299,392 times
Reputation: 6917
We could probably classify Hudson Yards as TOD, because it never would have developed this way without the 7 train extension.

https://i0.wp.com/aasarchitecture.co...?fit=876%2C485
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Rockville, MD
929 posts, read 1,902,079 times
Reputation: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
For fun's sake, I'll throw Jersey City into the ring of contenders. Through most of the 20th century, Jersey City's waterfront was mostly rail yards and docks. In the 1980s, mixed-use development began, continued through the 1990s, and exploded in the 2000s and 2010s. All of it has been fueled by transit access to NYC via the PATH rail system and ferries, and in 2000 a light rail system opened connecting other waterfront nodes to PATH and to other locations.

Since 2000, over 25,000 residential units, a couple million square feet of office space, and retail (not sure the square footage of retail) have been developed on the JC waterfront. There's about 37,600 residential units in the pipeline (planned, approved, or under construction) citywide, most of which is in clusters near PATH and LRT stations.

The change from 2000: http://davidselvey.com/imgs/1994%20M...tc/94%2090.jpg
http://image.nj.com/home/njo-media/w...5672cad5e.jpeg

to now:https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...re-id923968652
https://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/up...ey-skyline.jpg

is pretty remarkable.
Newport, Jersey City is a solid example of a typical TOD, though this sort of development is pretty atypical for the NYC area. I think White Plains and Stamford have some of it outside of LIRR stations.


This is not in North America, but Sydney in Australia is rife with transit-proximate development around Sydney Trains stations. I'm not sure that I'd call all of them TODs though, since some of the development seems to have predated the transit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top