Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What are the fastest paced cities? (Choose 3) Update for 2019
Boston 60 25.53%
New York City 203 86.38%
Jersey City 17 7.23%
Philadelphia 39 16.60%
Baltimore 1 0.43%
Washington DC 96 40.85%
Raleigh 1 0.43%
Charlotte 1 0.43%
Atlanta 9 3.83%
Nashville 2 0.85%
Tampa 2 0.85%
Miami 18 7.66%
Chicago 76 32.34%
Dallas 8 3.40%
Houston 13 5.53%
Austin 3 1.28%
Minneapolis 1 0.43%
Pittsburgh 2 0.85%
Phoenix 4 1.70%
Denver 1 0.43%
San Jose 3 1.28%
San Francisco 45 19.15%
Los Angeles 53 22.55%
San Diego 1 0.43%
Other City 6 2.55%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 235. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2024, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,162 posts, read 9,054,479 times
Reputation: 10496

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidyankee764 View Post
If you think Los Angeles is “laid back”, you don’t know Los Angeles.
I've visited the city three times: once in 1966 (the Watts rioters torched the business block next to my great-uncles package store but left his store untouched; it was located at 137th and Willowbrook Avenue — I think the A Line to Long Beach passes it now) and twice in the 1980s while my Mom was stationed at VA Medical Center Brentwood.

Those latter visits were the first time I drove in bumper-to-bumper traffic, all doing 60, and I found that rather interesting. But while the city certainly was busy, it didn't seem like the same kind of busy I experience here in Philly or did on my one visit so far to San Francisco in 2006.

I do note that generally speaking, in this discussion, Philadelphia and LA occupy the same plane, and so calling it fast-paced is not an inaccurate statement. But I still maintain, and I'd say that I'm in the majority here, that basing that conclusion simply on how many cars are on the road doesn't give you an accurate picture. It's in the interpersonal realm that you pick up the vibe, and that requires getting out of the car.

Though bumper-to-bumper traffic doing the speed limit, I guess, does say something. Usually, traffic that heavy slows down. The only other city where I've experienced that is Houston, which I've called "Texas' answer to LA, right down to the palm trees, those freeways full of Andretti wannabes and a suburb named Pasadena."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2024, 03:58 PM
 
1,035 posts, read 565,754 times
Reputation: 2442
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidyankee764 View Post
Los Angeles. It has amongst the least amount of foot traffic and mass transit commuters of any major city. That’s a statistical fact. Would you call LA slow paced? Because I certainly would not.
L.A can be stressful (especially the traffic) and b*tchy but compared to a few East Coast cities (cough cough NYC.) L.A can be very “peace and love” (my husband’s exact words)-when we just moved back to L.A (my family is in L.A) after living in more than a decade in Manhattan I remember both of us were driven crazy by how slow people returned your phone calls and how “slow” some people drove (esp in the rain!) and how passive-aggressive some people in L.A were. (again compared to how we were accustomed in NYC.)

I was selling my condo in Manhattan while us buying a house in L.A simultaneously.-huge differences from the realtors on respective coasts. Sometimes people in L.A take their sweet time getting things done, and depends on where you are in L.A, yes, it can be slow-paced (such as getting stuck in Downtown L.A for a good half an hour passing Dodger Stadium tunnel.-that’s very SLOW-PACED.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2024, 04:52 PM
 
21,618 posts, read 31,193,827 times
Reputation: 9775
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
I've visited the city three times: once in 1966 (the Watts rioters torched the business block next to my great-uncles package store but left his store untouched; it was located at 137th and Willowbrook Avenue — I think the A Line to Long Beach passes it now) and twice in the 1980s while my Mom was stationed at VA Medical Center Brentwood.

Those latter visits were the first time I drove in bumper-to-bumper traffic, all doing 60, and I found that rather interesting. But while the city certainly was busy, it didn't seem like the same kind of busy I experience here in Philly or did on my one visit so far to San Francisco in 2006.

I do note that generally speaking, in this discussion, Philadelphia and LA occupy the same plane, and so calling it fast-paced is not an inaccurate statement. But I still maintain, and I'd say that I'm in the majority here, that basing that conclusion simply on how many cars are on the road doesn't give you an accurate picture. It's in the interpersonal realm that you pick up the vibe, and that requires getting out of the car.

Though bumper-to-bumper traffic doing the speed limit, I guess, does say something. Usually, traffic that heavy slows down. The only other city where I've experienced that is Houston, which I've called "Texas' answer to LA, right down to the palm trees, those freeways full of Andretti wannabes and a suburb named Pasadena."
I didn’t suggest the amount of cars on the road meant a fast pace - I said driving styles/habits/impatience. Very different things. I very much disagree that to pick up a vibe, you have to get out of your car.

We won’t agree on this so it’s best to leave it at that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2024, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,088 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15078
Not sure if this is any slower than Boston/DC/Philly.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjrPHvjilmE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2024, 08:39 AM
 
1,035 posts, read 565,754 times
Reputation: 2442
^^Walked from the loop through State St all the way to the river + Michigan Avenue + Wacker Drive……

Any city with stock exchange is bound to be fast paced, imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2024, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,088 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15078
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidyankee764 View Post
Los Angeles. It has amongst the least amount of foot traffic and mass transit commuters of any major city. That’s a statistical fact. Would you call LA slow paced? Because I certainly would not.
That's not true. It doesn't have as much foot traffic or as many transit commuters as a few other cities but it's far from being towards the bottom for major American cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2024, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,162 posts, read 9,054,479 times
Reputation: 10496
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
That's not true. It doesn't have as much foot traffic or as many transit commuters as a few other cities but it's far from being towards the bottom for major American cities.
Cone top think of it, BajanYankee is right.

LA may have lots of freeways, but it also has a two-line heavy rail subway (one line of which will ultimately reach Santa Monica), four light rail/light metro lines and two BRT routes.

Not to mention one of the most heavily used bus systems in the country.

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's two rapid transit subway lines carry more than 25 million riders annually, making it the 9th-busiest rapid transit system in the US. (There are 15 total.) And the LACMTA system in toto logged 254,688,124 trips in calendar 2022, according to the National Transit Database.

Definitely far from "towards the bottom."

Sorry I keep riding this horse, kidyankee764, but it really seems to me that your understanding of urban areas and what makes them tick is too autocentric.

I grew up in a city that has a bus system and now a modern streetcar; both are totally free to ride, but the buses mostly run empty while the streetcar is quite popular. However, I learned to use the buses to get around it (they weren't as empty when I was a kid) before I learned how to drive, and that habit has served me well ever since (and probably explains why I live in the Northeast rather than Kansas City). And it should be clear by now that I also have a driver's license and drive from time to time.

It has a few nodes of pedestrian activity but is otherwise a drive-everywhere place. Its downtown is bereft of signs of life on its streets even during the work week. Folks get around it quickly because it has the lowest level of traffic congestion of any 2m+ US metro, but no one would call it fast-paced.

LA makes the cut because, um, not everyone there drives. I've at least acknowledged that driving can tell you something about an area. I don't think it's the primary feature to use to determine how fast-paced it is, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2024, 09:38 AM
 
Location: 215
2,235 posts, read 1,118,540 times
Reputation: 1990
The entire discussion about LA can be summarized as vibrant ≠ fast paced, although both can be stressful.

Various environmental factors like weather, urban density, architecture, and other things have an impact on people's moods and perceptions, which contribute to certain types of images or cultures, i.e., faster speech and less impatience. At the end of the day, it's really just psychological.

I'll give LA a +1 if we're comparing Metros though; it's much faster-paced and lively than the Delaware Valley since center city is/was designed to be the central hub for all activities in the region, which is why most of the suburbs feel "sleepy", especially on the Jersey side outside of Camden and it's suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top