Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Underrated Blue collar cultural presence
NYC 20 21.05%
Boston 25 26.32%
D.C 6 6.32%
Dallas 9 9.47%
L.A 18 18.95%
Miami 3 3.16%
Seattle 18 18.95%
Twin Cities 12 12.63%
Oakland 8 8.42%
Nashville 4 4.21%
Other (Specify) 14 14.74%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2019, 01:34 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,851,017 times
Reputation: 8656

Advertisements

Speaking as a construction guy, I'll reiterate that point! The most white collar, expensive cities are typically teeming with construction jobs. Much of that's about how fast the city is growing and how much it's investing in itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2019, 01:57 PM
 
2,269 posts, read 3,799,707 times
Reputation: 2133
Probably not anymore, but Brooklyn and Queens used to be the most stereotypical blue collar places in America. NYC always had multiple faces, and the NYC version of each face was in the past, if not the premier version of each, close to it. Lower Manhattan, the face of white collar America. Midtown, shopping and Broadway. Upper East, and West Sides, the urban wealthy. Harlem, the face of Black America. Brooklyn, and Queens, ethnic blue collar America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 06:21 PM
 
4,394 posts, read 4,284,253 times
Reputation: 3902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
Probably not anymore, but Brooklyn and Queens used to be the most stereotypical blue collar places in America. NYC always had multiple faces, and the NYC version of each face was in the past, if not the premier version of each, close to it. Lower Manhattan, the face of white collar America. Midtown, shopping and Broadway. Upper East, and West Sides, the urban wealthy. Harlem, the face of Black America. Brooklyn, and Queens, ethnic blue collar America.
Back in the 80's NYC was very much a blue collar city. D.C was as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 10:22 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
1,886 posts, read 1,440,830 times
Reputation: 1308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turnerbro View Post
Jacksonville probably. I think most people are pretty familiar with the blue collar culture of the other three.
Yeah, and a lot of people have negative views of the three cities blue collar culture IMO. In the cities that are in the poll, their blue collar culture is hardly highlighted at all. In the movies and on TV, they only highlight the uber rich and the glamorous parts of those cities.

Last edited by QCongress83216; 01-12-2020 at 10:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 07:59 AM
 
195 posts, read 195,112 times
Reputation: 212
Seattle was extremely blue collar prior to the 90's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Miami (prev. NY, Atlanta, SF, OC and San Diego)
7,409 posts, read 6,542,189 times
Reputation: 6682
I would often escape snooty Orange County, CA and drive 20-30 minutes to be in more down to earth, more mixed—including blue collar—Long Beach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 08:25 AM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,927,598 times
Reputation: 4565
I voted LA, Oakland and Seattle. LA specifically because of the image shift that Hollywood and the fashion industry has done for LA. LA was a HUGE factory city. The aerospace industry was a huge employer. Especially in world war 2. The making of airplane parts and wheels etc. This industrial past of LA is highlighted in only a few film and TV shows. Then at one point, Firestone and other tire companies had huge factories in South Central. South Central being kind like a geographic hub of LA county was an idea location for these factories. And then you have the port of Los Angeles and Long Beach being huge ports for trade, and having plenty of longshoremen/blue collar type jobs. Samething with Oakland. Especially during WWII. A huge reason why so many Black people left Texas, and Louisiana for Oakland and Los Angeles was because of those blue collar port jobs and then for some of those factory jobs during WWII during the great migration. LA and Oakland are blue collar towns at heart. Seattle samething, with the Lumber industry. The whole flannel “grunge” aesthetic in the 90s came from that PNW lumber industry I believe. Tech/emphasis of Higher Education, Fashion and Hollywood have dramatically shifted the image of those 3 cities in the last 50 or so years. The reason why I didn’t vote Boston, NYC, or any other northern city, is because the “blue collar” image of these cities is still fresh on people’s minds. There’s still a huge portion of ppl who have never forgotten about the blue collar euro immigrant past of Boston and NYC. It’s still used as a trope in movies. When was the last show set in Boston that was actually about Harvard? Shows set in Boston usually follow some blue collar Irish descended dude struggling to find his way. With NYC, even in shows that are about white collar yuppies, you still have counter shows that show the everyday subway taking blue collar New Yorker. You still have shows where the blue collar NYC construction guy is still a trope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,159 posts, read 7,989,874 times
Reputation: 10123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
Probably not anymore, but Brooklyn and Queens used to be the most stereotypical blue collar places in America. NYC always had multiple faces, and the NYC version of each face was in the past, if not the premier version of each, close to it. Lower Manhattan, the face of white collar America. Midtown, shopping and Broadway. Upper East, and West Sides, the urban wealthy. Harlem, the face of Black America. Brooklyn, and Queens, ethnic blue collar America.
Yeah the stereotype of Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island and the Bronx is literally.. blue collar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
955 posts, read 610,191 times
Reputation: 1074
LA & Seattle. These two conjure up images of the Kardashians, Amazon, etc. and a lot of people have forgotten about the blue collar population.

I'm shocked Boston is winning the poll though. I really associate Boston with that whole The Departed, Southie, Irish Catholic image but perhaps other people don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 10:12 AM
 
Location: D.C. / I-95
2,750 posts, read 2,417,120 times
Reputation: 3363
NYC or LA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top