Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2019, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,655 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Most, or largest percentage of the total?

Also, how is "start up" defined? Are we talking early investor funding recipients or corner groceries or both? This isn't very useful without a source and method.
Good point about how 'start up' is defined. Apparently it refers to the percentage of start ups in a metro area that are minority-owned in all industries.

Here is the source:
https://www.volusion.com/blog/cities...wned-startups/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2019, 10:06 PM
 
Location: MD -> NoMa DC
409 posts, read 333,658 times
Reputation: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
Ok. As promised, here are the foreign born white growths by metro area. These are just immigrants from Europe that will be counted below. Immigrants from the Middle East or West Asia are not counted below despite being considered white by the census. Seems Europeans are really only growing in Florida, California, and Texas with a couple of outliers like Seattle and Phoenix:

Orlando: 10,050
Miami/Fort Lauderdale: 9,316
Sacramento: 7,047
Los Angeles: 6,996
San Francisco: 6,862
Dallas/Fort Worth: 5,489
Phoenix: 5,002
Austin: 4,824
Seattle/Tacoma: 4,554
Houston: 3,786
Tampa: 3,751
Washington DC: 3,448
San Diego: 3,290
Minneapolis/St. Paul: 2,463
San Jose: 2,380
Riverside: 2,048
Boston: 1,403
Las Vegas: 1,040
Charlotte: 793
Philadelphia: -1,606
Denver: -1,629
Atlanta: -2,933
Detroit: -4,105
Cleveland: -4,177
Portland: -5,654
Chicago: -21,506
New York: -70,415 (NYC had growth in Eastern and Southern Europe, but huge losses in Northern and Western Europe)
Interesting that both Boston and the DC metros lost whites but both gained white immigrants. The only 2 east coast cities to have that happen.

As for the DC area, most of our white immigrants are now from Eastern and Southern Europe as opposed to Northern and Western Europe. It was always the latter for decades but Southern Europeans & Eastern Europeans overtook that group in 2017. Mostly Russians, Balkans (Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Albania) Portuguese, Spaniards with sprinkles of Italians/Greeks/Turks who contribute mostly to this growth.

But Northern and Western Europe also grew but by a smaller number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221
probably portugues into boston-just guessing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,333 posts, read 5,492,671 times
Reputation: 12286
Actually in the case of both DC and Boston, the largest increases came from Eastern Europe. Southern Europe was relatively flat for both. In DC the largest increase came from Russia. In Boston, Poland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,158 posts, read 2,209,438 times
Reputation: 4210
Just for clarification - not all immigrants born in Europe are necessarily White. There is a substantial population in countries such as United Kingdom and France who have ancestry from their former colonies in Africa, Asia and elsewhere, and later migrated to the US. I would expect virtually all immigrants from eastern Europe are White, as those countries are more homogeneous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221
I delved into Boston MA data to see how much NH was affecting the numbers-the answer is..not much at all. Without NH you get a larger slightly more diverse metro that is more black and Latino and less Asian. I use Suffolk County as the hub of it all so there is some overlap with Suffolk County:

The 'Southern Portion' of the existing Boston Metro: Suffolk, Norfolk, and Plymouth Counties, Population ~2,030,000
64.4% White
15.3% Black or mixed race including black
11.9% Latino
8.1% Asian

^this is the 'blackest' part of the state

That portion expanded Suffolk, Norfolk, Plymouth, Bristol Counties and Providence County Rhode Island, Population ~3,230,000
66.8% White
13.0% Black or mixed race including black
13.5% Latino
6.4% Asian

'Southern Portion' of Boston Metro+ Providence County, Rhode Island and Worcester County, Population ~4,060,000
67.0% White
11.6% Black
13.2% Latino
6.2% Asian

The 'Northern Portion of the existing Boston Metro (excluding New Hampshire): Essex, Middlesex And Suffolk County MA, population 3,211,000
64.3% White
14.5% Latino
9.7% Asian
8.2% Black



Eastern MA (excluding the Cape and Islands) +Worcester County, MA and Providence County, RI, Population ~6,464,000
68.4% White
13.0% Latino
9.6% Black
7.6% Asian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 02:13 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,462,284 times
Reputation: 1886
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDfinest View Post
Interesting that both Boston and the DC metros lost whites but both gained white immigrants. The only 2 east coast cities to have that happen.

As for the DC area, most of our white immigrants are now from Eastern and Southern Europe as opposed to Northern and Western Europe. It was always the latter for decades but Southern Europeans & Eastern Europeans overtook that group in 2017. Mostly Russians, Balkans (Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Albania) Portuguese, Spaniards with sprinkles of Italians/Greeks/Turks who contribute mostly to this growth.

But Northern and Western Europe also grew but by a smaller number.
Sacramento was third place for Europeans. Probably from the Ukraine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2019, 02:17 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,462,284 times
Reputation: 1886
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
Ok. As promised, here are the foreign born white growths by metro area. These are just immigrants from Europe that will be counted below. Immigrants from the Middle East or West Asia are not counted below despite being considered white by the census. Seems Europeans are really only growing in Florida, California, and Texas with a couple of outliers like Seattle and Phoenix:

Orlando: 10,050
Miami/Fort Lauderdale: 9,316
Sacramento: 7,047
Los Angeles: 6,996
San Francisco: 6,862
Dallas/Fort Worth: 5,489
Phoenix: 5,002
Austin: 4,824
Seattle/Tacoma: 4,554
Houston: 3,786
Tampa: 3,751
Washington DC: 3,448
San Diego: 3,290
Minneapolis/St. Paul: 2,463
San Jose: 2,380
Riverside: 2,048
Boston: 1,403
Las Vegas: 1,040
Charlotte: 793
Philadelphia: -1,606
Denver: -1,629
Atlanta: -2,933
Detroit: -4,105
Cleveland: -4,177
Portland: -5,654
Chicago: -21,506
New York: -70,415 (NYC had growth in Eastern and Southern Europe, but huge losses in Northern and Western Europe)
How much growth is from the European diaspora outside of Europe including Canada, Australia, South Africa, and South America?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,333 posts, read 5,492,671 times
Reputation: 12286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coe View Post
How much growth is from the European diaspora outside of Europe including Canada, Australia, South Africa, and South America?
They dont track the specific race for immigrants than Im aware of. They divide it two ways: race or ethnicity and ancestry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,333 posts, read 5,492,671 times
Reputation: 12286
I noticed I havent done total foreign born numbers. Ill do one post for total population and another for growth from 2013-2018:

Total Foreign born population as of 2018:
New York: 5,803,801
Los Angeles: 4,834,720
Miami/Fort Lauderdale: 2,552,188
Chicago: 1,680,196
Houston: 1,648,798
San Francisco: 1,443,230
Washington DC: 1,427,734
Dallas/Fort Worth: 1,414,578
Riverside: 987,978
Boston: 943,500
Atlanta: 824,050
San Diego: 790,023
San Jose: 768,800
Seattle: 759,002
Phoenix: 695,508
Philadelphia: 694,072
Las Vegas: 496,521
Orlando: 491,138
Sacramento: 455,073
Tampa: 451,021
Detroit: 446,559
Minneapolis: 395,865
Denver: 349,839
Austin: 326,395
Portland: 323,763
San Antonio: 304,642
Baltimore: 290,528
Charlotte: 260,727
Providence: 214,756
Columbus: 185,750
Nashville: 164,288
Hartford: 161,452
Salt Lake City: 158,979
Raleigh: 158,969
Jacksonville: 157,921
Kansas City: 149,650
Indianapolis: 142,553
St. Louis: 141,894
Cleveland: 122,573
Milwaukee: 121,107
Virginia Beach: 118,471
Oklahoma City: 114,317
Cincinnati: 113,366
Richmond: 107,478
New Orleans: 98,386
Pittsburgh: 92,299
Buffalo: 81,120
Louisville: 78,608
Memphis: 73,720
Memphis: 44,111
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top