Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2019, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229

Advertisements


2018 County GDP, $100B+
$787.186B Los Angeles, CA
$711.974B New York, NY
$411.671B Cook, IL
$387.731B Harris, TX
$328.260B Santa Clara, CA
$303.694B King, WA
$264.438B Dallas, TX
$260.484B Orange, CA
$247.622B Maricopa, AZ
$245.138B San Diego, CA
$183.171B San Francisco, CA
$171.126B Middlesex, MA
$167.756B Fulton, GA
$164.632B Miami-Dade, FL
$144.494B Alameda, CA
$140.660B Washington, DC
$137.015B Hennepin, MN
$132.808B Suffolk, MA
$122.423B Clark, NV
$120.491B Philadelphia, PA
$120.101B Tarrant, TX
$114.862B San Mateo, CA
$114 507B Mecklenburg, NC
$114.152B Fairfax, VA
$112.604B Oakland, MI
$111.568B Travis, TX
$109.073B Bexar, TX
$108.755B Queens, NY
$108.572B Broward, FL
$105.937B Kings, NY
$100.074B Cuyahoga, OH
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2019, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Medfid
6,806 posts, read 6,029,753 times
Reputation: 5242
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I think the Boston MSA might pass Philly
Nice call!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:04 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,186,261 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd433 View Post
That seems strange. Dallas has been growing jobs but the overall GDP is down from the 2017 numbers? A news feed also just came out saying that Dallas has lost a lot of tech jobs.
I thought they would eventually overtake Chicago but now Chicago has widened the lead. Oh well, we still have the Cowboys to watch.
I would have thought so too given Dallas' crazy population gains, but if anything Chicago has a shining star in its ability to expand its GDP despite not having a growing population. It's been doing this for a few decades now.

Dallas' MSA population has grown by 44% since 2001 and its GDP has grown by 122%.
Chicago's MSA population has grown by 4% since 2001 and its GDP has grown by 72%.

That means that for ever 1% growth in population Dallas is creating 3% additional GDP while Chicago is creating 16% GDP for every 1% growth in population.

It's a complicated picture for Chicago though, with much of the population losses and people leaving being underprivileged, poorer people who are underemployed, while the reverse is happening with a strong showing in white collar jobs and college graduates coming to the area.

Difference between Chicago and Dallas GDP (millions) by year. It's been remarkably stable the past two decades despite very different population trends:

2001: 170.9
2003: 177.0
2005: 185.6
2007: 186.0
2009: 173.4
2011: 176.5
2013: 183.1
2015: 185.3
2018: 177.0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:05 AM
 
14,019 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by iAMtheVVALRUS View Post
Nice call!
Some call me a master at linear extrapolation.


But really It’s baffling Hartford is such a wealthy metro but such a hot mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,727,444 times
Reputation: 11216
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Some call me a master at linear extrapolation.


But really It’s baffling Hartford is such a wealthy metro but such a hot mess.
its not that much of a hot mess. anymore. Also think of Hartford as Dorchester circa 2005 if it were an independent city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
I'm surprised to see the the gap between Baltimore and Charlotte/St. Louis has widened to $+35 billion, I'd have expected Charlotte to gain ground if anything.

Boston surpassing Philly was ineviatable, while San Fran surpassing Washington DC also didn't surprise me considering the economic boom going on there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:19 AM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,620,852 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Interactive tables, regional data, GDP by county or metropolitan area.
Thanks! Found it, but I can't get it to list them in sequential order like the screenshot he posted...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,316,290 times
Reputation: 3769
Seattle being damn near equal with Atlanta; a metro 25% larger is stunning, even considering Amazon is the driving force behind that.

Baltimore widening its gap on San Bernardino & Charlotte considering the population boom the later metros have had comes as a interesting surprise.

Boston surpassing Philly was inevitable, while San Fran surpassing Washington DC also didn't surprise me considering the economic boom going on there.

Last edited by Joakim3; 12-12-2019 at 08:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
1,507 posts, read 3,410,890 times
Reputation: 1527
Default How is this possible?

Both Dallas and Houston have taken several large businesses away from the San Francisco bay area. But yet The bay area h as still increased its lead over both places in GDP ? How is that possible?
They told us here in Texas that businesses want to leave the Bay Area and come to Texas because of California not being business friendly, the cost of living is too high, the political environment is hostile, plus Texas has no corporate taxes. We even offer billions of dollars in incentives and allow the corporations to run all the politics and get their way while paying no taxes.
But yet the Bay area GDP is still growing faster while both Dallas and Houston actually lost GDP this year?
What is going on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2019, 08:22 AM
 
14,019 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
its not that much of a hot mess. anymore. Also think of Hartford as Dorchester circa 2005 if it were an independent city.
The whole metro is not doing anything it’s odd. Like Buffalo’s GDP grew more than it and its GDP is 30B smaller for a similar sized city.

Other wealthy metro areas are wealthy because they are attracting high dollar talent. Hartford is wealthy because of interia. Although one good thing about Hartford is since the housing market never recovered from 2007 the housing/salary ratio is really great there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top