Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is the Leading US Biotech Region?
Boston 39 56.52%
New York/New Jersey 1 1.45%
Philadelphia 3 4.35%
Raleigh/Durham 4 5.80%
Seattle 2 2.90%
San Francisco Bay Area 10 14.49%
San Diego 5 7.25%
Other 5 7.25%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2020, 03:52 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,552,695 times
Reputation: 5785

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
DC and MD lack major pharma investment relative to the other areas Sure Gaithersburg is interesting but that cluster is relatively small compared to what you see in Boston or the Bay or Philly or North Jersey


its growing but in Biotech its still a ways to go and to reliant on a few companies It also continually struggles to get the best talent, especially on the commercial side oddly enough as it does so well in almost all other industries in this regard DC/MD does well here but there are few areas that are pretty far ahead of DC in Biotech
Agreed, just saying it certainly is strong enough a market to make the poll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2020, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
19 posts, read 9,699 times
Reputation: 30
Boston has the top two biology programs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 04:29 PM
 
14,019 posts, read 15,001,786 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Boston is very big in Biotech but a statement like Boston then everyone else or period is either totally biased or totally uninformed


I might give a very very very slight edge to Boston over SF, but its really really really close and believe it or not North Jersey/NYC is really close to those two with Philly likely a solid 4 while Boston is no doubt a leader and huge in biotech it by no means has any vast hold it on. As someone (well pre covid) spends his career in biotech in Cambridge and the 128 corridor and North Jersey and the Bay and Philly etc (seattle and you name it) its not some aspect that is extremely differentiating in fact I don't think you can say Boston or the Bay leads and even that far in front of North Jersey. You completely miss actual Pharma funding which is the LARGEST driver by far, NIH and VC are not even close to what investments big pharma makes and generates in biotech


again not diminishing Boston as some amazing stuff and huge cluster but its not alone in this
NIH funding gives Boston a clear and significant lead over everyone else.

If you extend it to all Heathcare it’s closer but I always thought of Pharma as distinct from BioTech
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,733,519 times
Reputation: 11216
Yea...

Boston.

SF for tech in general.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC
118 posts, read 113,546 times
Reputation: 146
Why are so many speaking so confidently about the DC area's weakness in biotech VC funding and not just looking it up; and someone posted a link to easily look at:

"third in patents (4943, just 32 ahead of San Diego), and fourth in lab space (with 22.5 million square feet according to Rockville, MD-based Scheer Partners, which measures the entire region [vs. JLL’s 9.5 million for “suburban Maryland”]). VC has improved from sixth in 2016: PwC/CB Insights ranks the region fourth with $944.07 million in 44 deals, but JLL tallies $1.1 billion, good enough for third. This year’s VC includes the $250 million Series A financing completed in February by Viela Bio in Gaithersburg, MD, formed when AstraZeneca spun off six pipeline candidates of its Gaithersburg-based MedImmune subsidiary."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
795 posts, read 482,042 times
Reputation: 1062
Just an article I found about Boston and San Francisco on this subject:
https://www.thebalance.com/boston-an...ch-hubs-375641


Honestly, I didn't vote - I don't know much about this topic at all.


Edit:
Another article listing the big BioPharma Hubs as they're called:
https://www.genengnews.com/a-lists/t...ma-clusters-6/

Another article:
https://www.biospace.com/article/-to...rma-stem-jobs/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 05:14 PM
 
37,877 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274
Seems to be Boston with SF a close second.

https://www.cbre.us/research-and-rep...-Clusters-2019
https://sciencecenter.org/news/top-1...rma-clusters-2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,724 posts, read 6,718,975 times
Reputation: 7568
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprez33 View Post
After those three, there are really no other biotech clusters. You have to draw a big circle around the other areas to create a biotech region. For example, if you took a map of SD and put a pin in the Salk Institute and drew a circle with a 5 mile radius, you'd encircle about 1,000 biotech companies. I don't think this can be replicated anywhere else. Maybe Kendall Square.
Good points.

Interesting thing about Kendall Square was that it used to be a transitioning industrial area. Same with South San Francisco, Mission Bay, and Emeryville which are the three top biotech neighborhoods in the Bay Area. Meanwhile, Salk Institute and UCSD are surrounded by the amazing cliffs and beaches of La Jolla and Torrey Pines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 09:29 PM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,518 posts, read 24,000,129 times
Reputation: 23946
Boston, I’d say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,159 posts, read 7,989,874 times
Reputation: 10123
Boston hands down and the COVID-19 pandemic has increased lab presence by another 15%.
But SF/SJC is not far behind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top