Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Preferable State: Washington or Colorado
I'd prefer WASHINGTON (the state) 32 50.79%
I'd Prefer COLORADO 11 17.46%
NEITHER, These States don't appeal to me 10 15.87%
BOTH! Some of the Best States Ever 10 15.87%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2021, 09:29 AM
 
638 posts, read 348,560 times
Reputation: 1107

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by C24L View Post
Neither for me.
Both states could use less people. Go fo California lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2021, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,353 posts, read 5,127,881 times
Reputation: 6771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thealpinist View Post
Both states could use less people. Go fo California lol
I'd have to disagree. CO would be better if it had mountain small cities instead of just mountain towns. Like if Westcliffe had a grocery store, that would be better. The Front Range and the Puget Sound are both full, but there's more options than those spots.

Denver and Seattle illicit polarizing opinions. Colorado is a good state despite Denver, not because of it (IMO ). Most of the state is still "unspoiled" if you will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2021, 10:15 PM
 
Location: USA Gulf Coast
393 posts, read 261,624 times
Reputation: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thealpinist View Post
Both states could use less people. Go fo California lol
California is losing people due to (top reason) its cost of living, which is way too high. So, why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2021, 11:29 PM
 
Location: Northern California
4,606 posts, read 2,994,775 times
Reputation: 8364
They are indeed a couple of great states.... I'd choose WA because I don't like cold winters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 12:22 AM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,924,430 times
Reputation: 4942
I've never been to Colorado, but I think I prefer WA since Colorado doesn't seem to have any major water features, it's got a few small lakes and rivers but they don't compare to what WA offers. Also WA population distribution I think is better.

State: Population | State: Population

Washington: 7,705,281 | Colorado: 5,773,714

Metro: Population (% of State) Distance from Seattle (Time) | Metro: Population (% of State) Distance from Denver (Time)

1. Seattle: 3,979,845 (51.65%) 0 mi | Denver: 2,967,239 (51.39%) 0 mi

2. Spokane: 568,521 (7.38%) 348 mi (4 hr 20 min) | Colorado Springs: 745,791 (12.92%) 71 mi (1 hr 11 min)

3. Vancouver: 500,324 (6.49%) 165 mi (2 hr 38 min) | Fort Collins: 356,899 (6.18%) 65 mi (1 hr 7 min)

4. Kennewick (Tri-Cities): 299,612 (3.89%) 214 mi (3 hr 33 min) | Boulder: 326,196 (5.64%) 29 mi (32 min)

5. Olympia: 290,536 (3.77%) 61 mi (1 hr 1 min) | Greeley: 324,492 (5.62%) 56 min (1 hr 5 min)

6. Bremerton: 271,473 (3.52%) 17 mi (1 hr) | Pueblo: 168,424 (2.92%) 114 mi (1 hr 45 min)

7. Yakima: 250,873 (3.26%) 142 mi (2 hr 17 min) | Grand Junction: 154,210 (2.67%) 243 mi (4 hr 6 min)

8. Bellingham: 229,247 (2.97%) 89 mi (1 hr 27 min) |

9. Mt. Vernon: 129,205 (1.68%) 61 mi (59 min) |

10. Wenatchee: 120,629 (1.57%) 148 mi (2 hr 34 min) |

11. Long View: 110,593 (1.44%) 128 mi (2 hr 5 min) |

12. Walla Walla: 60,760 (0.79%) 261 mi (4 hr 20 min) |

Last edited by grega94; 05-15-2021 at 01:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 12:57 AM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,870,959 times
Reputation: 8812
It’s funny I was just thinking about this today. My thought process was how much more I enjoy consistency in weather than extreme changes. So, Washington.

Just for the record the above mentioned Kennewick total is the entire TriCities region, not just Kennewick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 04:44 AM
 
24,558 posts, read 18,244,243 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW4me View Post
They are indeed a couple of great states.... I'd choose WA because I don't like cold winters.
On a typical January day in Denver, I go out for lunch wearing a down vest over an Oxford shirt and I have to wear sunglasses. I’m in Vancouver BC more than Seattle but it’s the same climate. I’m wearing a Gore Tex shell with the hood popped and it’s drizzling. Personally, I’d rather scrape the ice off the windshield in the morning and have 50F & sunny at noon. The lack of winter sunlight in Seattle would probably trigger SADS unless I surrounded myself with broad spectrum lighting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,297,887 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prickly Pear View Post
The Phoenix MSA is 5 million in population, and is notably higher than this in snowbird season (an extra 500k+ is added during snowbird season, which is the population of Arizona's second largest municipality of Mesa).

Seattle MSA is about 4 million

Denver MSA is 3 million

To be honest I was wrong but also yourself. I assumed Seattle was identical to Phoenix in size at 5 mil then actually being that much smaller, and I thought Denver was at 2.5. My assumption was generally rooted in the fact that Washington has one more electoral vote than Arizona and that Spokane was probably the extra vote over Tucson as AZ is highly concentrated to the Phoenix MSA for population. I generally viewed Seattle and Phoenix as comparable cities population wise, but clearly Phoenix is much larger than Seattle than I thought. It must mean Washington's secondary cities are much stronger than Arizona's, which is probably right.

If Denver and Seattle are "identical" in size then my home city of Phoenix is not identical in size to Seattle, we cannot have these large million+ gaps to identical cities. Phoenix is closer to double Denver, especially for half the year when we deal with snowbirds. And again, I assumed Phoenix and Seattle were comparable but that can't be right if Seattle is comparable to Denver at again, almost half of Phoenix.

These figures are of course based on Wikipedia's 2019 estimates. If you can find MSA populations from the 2020 census I would like to see it, but I can't find it online.
If you compare the Seattle CSA to the Front Range (excluding Pueblo and Cheyenne) you get about the same amount of people.
Ft. Collins is as far away as Bremerton and Mt Vernon. Silverdale is further away from Seattle than Colorado Springs is to Denver. So if you look at the general population of both immediate areas, it's much closer in size. Adding Ft. Collins and Colorado Springs metro areas is another 1.1-1.5 million people added to about 4+ million people already in the CSA.

I know that's not how this works but it's a far more honest explanation than Seattle being significantly larger than Denver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,353 posts, read 5,127,881 times
Reputation: 6771
Quote:
Originally Posted by annie_himself View Post
If you compare the Seattle CSA to the Front Range (excluding Pueblo and Cheyenne) you get about the same amount of people.
Ft. Collins is as far away as Bremerton and Mt Vernon. Silverdale is further away from Seattle than Colorado Springs is to Denver. So if you look at the general population of both immediate areas, it's much closer in size. Adding Ft. Collins and Colorado Springs metro areas is another 1.1-1.5 million people added to about 4+ million people already in the CSA.
I fail to see how that's a good thing. Outside of DIA and the sports teams, there isn't a whole lot of synergy between COS and Denver or Ft. Collins and Greeley. It does mean more people funnling up I 70 though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2021, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,297,887 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
I fail to see how that's a good thing. Outside of DIA and the sports teams, there isn't a whole lot of synergy between COS and Denver or Ft. Collins and Greeley. It does mean more people funnling up I 70 though...
I never said it was good.
There's tons of people who live in Greeley, Ft. Collins, and the Springs who work here in a Denver. Or who have family here. People even live in Cheyenne and drive into Denver for work. The northern suburbs have tons of commuters between themselves as they are more connected than the Springs. Whenever RTD is able to build the passenger rail network it'll be even better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top