Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The Next Development City Hotspots This Decade
Austin, TX 29 39.19%
Nashville, TN 24 32.43%
Charlotte, NC 17 22.97%
Salt Lake City, UT 12 16.22%
Raleigh, NC 18 24.32%
Greenville, SC 7 9.46%
New York City, NY 11 14.86%
Seattle, WA 14 18.92%
Jersey City, NJ 9 12.16%
Other City 26 35.14%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2021, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whereiend View Post
Haven't read this entire thread but was someone arguing that Austin would ever catch Chicago?
No. No one was arguing that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2021, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,705,221 times
Reputation: 6092
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Easy View Post
NYC def seems to have peaked. Tons of new units have yet to be sold on billionaires row. They could still see more built in Queens and Brooklyn though. Maybe NYC will have secondary skylines that aren't as secondary as they have been.
NYC currently has 57 buildings above 300 ft under construction, with 3 being supertalls (JP Morgan Chase World HQ, Brooklyn tower, the Spiral).
There are also about ~100 proposals (hard to track them all), with about 11 proposed supertalls (3 of which at least should be u/c by next year).

While it is lower than the last cycle, NYC has hardly peaked. In terms of very tall skyscrapers (say above 800ft), NYC still builds the equivalent of the rest of the US combined.

Last edited by Gantz; 12-28-2021 at 02:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,055 posts, read 14,425,999 times
Reputation: 11240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
NYC currently has 57 buildings above 300 ft under construction, with 3 being supertalls (JP Morgan Chase World HQ, Brooklyn tower, the Spiral).
There are also about ~100 proposals (hard to track them all), with about 11 proposed supertalls.

While it is lower than the last cycle, NYC has hardly peaked. In terms of very tall skyscrapers (say above 800ft), NYC still builds the equivalent of the rest of the US combined.
Agreed. I read that post and was like uhm, that's not even close to accurate.

In downtown Brooklyn alone, there are 4 or 5 under construction right now, with another 8-10+ proposed.

The number of skyscrapers in Brooklyn today over 300 feet, is 62.

Brooklyn's total skyscraper count alone is greater than almost every single US city today, with the exception of 6 or 7, or so.
(Seattle, San Fran, LA, Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago)

NYC's skyscraper construction is going strong, and should continue to over the next several years, if the economy stays strong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,525 posts, read 2,317,651 times
Reputation: 3769
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Agreed. I read that post and was like uhm, that's not even close to accurate.

In downtown Brooklyn alone, there are 4 or 5 under construction right now, with another 8-10+ proposed.

The number of skyscrapers in Brooklyn today over 300 feet, is 62.

Brooklyn's total skyscraper count alone is greater than almost every single US city today, with the exception of 6 or 7, or so.
(Seattle, San Fran, LA, Houston, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago)

NYC's skyscraper construction is going strong, and should continue to over the next several years, if the economy stays strong.
I mean Brooklyn has the population of Chicago proper in 1/3 of the space .... it has always been able to support and absorb insane skyscraper growth independently of Manhattan, the only reason it's took off this last decade is because land prices in Manhattan have become so comically expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Coastal Connecticut
809 posts, read 467,948 times
Reputation: 1448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
I mean Brooklyn has the population of Chicago proper in 1/3 of the space .... it has always been able to support and absorb insane skyscraper growth independently of Manhattan, the only reason it's took off this last decade is because land prices in Manhattan have become so comically expensive.
Plus workers actually want to live in Brooklyn. Many employers are following the workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,159 posts, read 7,989,874 times
Reputation: 10123
lol will Boston ever get an 800fter? I hope not. But shall be interesting to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Albany, NY
120 posts, read 107,307 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
As far as the future, I have a lot more faith in things moving along now that the state is involved. The original height of Salesforce Tower as 1,200 ft but they had to lop off 130 ft to satisfy NIMBYs. Hopefully this time it's different.
Yep... and the Transamerica Pyramid was to top out at 1,150 feet before the NIMBYs got involved...

https://urbanlifesigns.blogspot.com/...elisk.html?m=1

Last edited by caravan70; 12-28-2021 at 05:38 PM.. Reason: Typo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 06:03 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,289,519 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by whereiend View Post
Haven't read this entire thread but was someone arguing that Austin would ever catch Chicago?

Generally speaking when talking about growth people speak in relative terms. By that, Austin is probably the second fastest growing city over the last 50 years after Vegas. (Vegas, Austin, Charlotte, and Orlando are all fairly close). I'd imagine that since 2000 Austin is probably #1.

In any case, it won't ever catch Chicago in population, much less as an urban center. I doubt that even Austin-San Antonio as a mega region could catch Chicago. That doesn't make Austin's growth any less real. Multiple ideas can be true at the same time.
It was somewhat implied as a poster brought up population loss (in a thread about skyscrapers).

The fact that "Austin-San Antonio" is even suggested as a thing is a huge tell that many people are aware that Austin's growth will soon begin to level out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2021, 06:16 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,289,519 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
NYC currently has 57 buildings above 300 ft under construction, with 3 being supertalls (JP Morgan Chase World HQ, Brooklyn tower, the Spiral).
There are also about ~100 proposals (hard to track them all), with about 11 proposed supertalls (3 of which at least should be u/c by next year).

While it is lower than the last cycle, NYC has hardly peaked. In terms of very tall skyscrapers (say above 800ft), NYC still builds the equivalent of the rest of the US combined.
This is how it works and also applies to mass transit.

The cities that have substantial systems in place are expanding them, regardless of population gain/loss.

The cities that have nothing continue to have nothing despite population booms.

What I'm waiting for is for one of the legacy rust belt cities like Detroit or Cleveland that does nothing but lose population throw up a huge skyscraper just for the lulz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2021, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati
860 posts, read 1,356,991 times
Reputation: 1130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
This is how it works and also applies to mass transit.

The cities that have substantial systems in place are expanding them, regardless of population gain/loss.

The cities that have nothing continue to have nothing despite population booms.

What I'm waiting for is for one of the legacy rust belt cities like Detroit or Cleveland that does nothing but lose population throw up a huge skyscraper just for the lulz.
This was actually super close to happening in Detroit. The currently under construction Hudson Tower was supposed to be the tallest in the city at over 900 ft, but they cut it down to just under 700 ft at the last minute. Now they're getting a 680 ft tower and another 300-400 footer a few blocks away. Cleveland damn near has a super tall, and Sherwin Williams is building a 600 footer to fill in the gap near Public Square and Tower City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top