Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm talking about park spaces with the metropolitan area, and forests/recreation areas/hiking just outside of the metro, too. And I'm not necessarily talking about scenery or whatever--that's not unimportant but obviously some places are just blessed with natural beauty in a way that others are not. Mainly I'm just talking about volume--which place has more plentiful access to hiking, parks, etc. Feel free to rank the five places I've listed.
I voted Charlotte. IMNSHO, the Metroplex has the worst natural setting of your choices. Mostly flat with inconsistent tree cover, and it's ridiculously hot and humid for 3-4 months out of the year. Indy is just as flat as DFW but has considerably more trees.
Last edited by bluescreen73; 05-23-2023 at 12:16 PM..
In order for me
Charlotte, Houston, San Antonio, Indianapolis, Dallas
I initially didn't see Charlotte in the poll
Why did you put Houston ahead of San Antonio?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
