Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you add Worcester and Providence, it’s over 30,000 which needs no explanation.
Side note:
Oddly enough I think the immigrant groups present in Providence more closely align with Bostons (Caribbean, Cape Verdean, Lusophone, East/Southeast Asian) than Worcesters which at least in my mind are more European, continental West African, and domestic from Puerto Rico. But it is hard to tell as they don't usually have enough raw # to crack these lists.
I do think the 'Worcester area' has a number of Indians in its far Eastern suburbs though (that is spillover from the Boston area though, the 'Worcester area' is like 5 towns realistically.)- unlike anywhere nearer to Providence.
The total numbers of immigrants for New York City is at a very high 148,599. I am confused, are these new immigrants admitted green cards for this decade or specifically to 2022?
Yeah how will this migrant crisis of this year impact the numbers that will be released next year?
It seems that New York, Massachusetts and California (maybe a few others) are weathering the brunt of the influx while others help with 0. This will definitely cause a statistical anomaly next year.
Yeah how will this migrant crisis of this year impact the numbers that will be released next year?
It seems that New York, Massachusetts and California (maybe a few others) are weathering the brunt of the influx while others help with 0. This will definitely cause a statistical anomaly next year.
The state that is weathering the brunt of the crisis is overwhelmingly Texas. I get that the media jumps up and down about the bussing, and I disagree with it too, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the number of people that actually cross. You’re talking about up to 250,000 encounters every month of which the overwhelming majority are in Texas compared to, at most, 10,000 migrants bused over the last year. It is extremely disingenuous to imply Texas isn’t the one bearing the brunt.
Yeah how will this migrant crisis of this year impact the numbers that will be released next year?
It seems that New York, Massachusetts and California (maybe a few others) are weathering the brunt of the influx while others help with 0. This will definitely cause a statistical anomaly next year.
Yeah this is just straight up false. I don’t like Abbott’s bussing either but this is just a small bit of the crisis border states like Texas have been dealing with for years.
The state that is weathering the brunt of the crisis is overwhelmingly Texas. I get that the media jumps up and down about the bussing, and I disagree with it too, but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the number of people that actually cross. You’re talking about up to 250,000 encounters every month of which the overwhelming majority are in Texas compared to, at most, 10,000 migrants bused over the last year. It is extremely disingenuous to imply Texas isn’t the one bearing the brunt.
Its more than bussing. NYC saw 100,000+ from April 2022. Thats pretty steep.
My question isnt who took more in, its how this will effect future migration data.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
