Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would say it is a race between Washington DC, San Francisco, or Boston. These three have the highest percentage using mass transit after New York City. All three systems feel relatively similar too. I would maybe give Boston and DC an edge over San Francisco because if you need to leave the Bay Area, there isn't a rail system to connect you to other cities as well as the inter-city rail network on the East Coast.
why no San Francisco on the list? I think San Francisco ranks second to NY based on the options available and the ridership.
Well its not the Saginaw Bay area, its not the Green Bay area, and its probably not the Hudson Bay area, so its probably the San Fransisco Bay Area. LOL
Who in the hell voted for LA? It's between Boston, Chicago, and San Francisco. Out of those three, it's between Boston and Chicago. SF's bus system sucked. I waited over 30 minutes for a freaking bus there. The BART was nice, though. Not used to cushioned subway seats.
DC has the best metro/subway/underground (whatever you would like to call it, its called the metro here) outside NY handsdown
Yep and I would say Chicago has the best bus system outside of NY hands down.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL
