Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What US city skyline do you think is pathetic for its size?
New York City 34 6.18%
Philadelphia 26 4.73%
Pittsburgh 7 1.27%
Baltimore 42 7.64%
Chicago 8 1.45%
Detroit 32 5.82%
Los Angeles 240 43.64%
Seattle 5 0.91%
Houston 40 7.27%
Other, please specify. 116 21.09%
Voters: 550. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2011, 11:28 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,935,298 times
Reputation: 7643

Advertisements

And I and a few other people have already said what was needed to be said about Fort Worth:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3544/...f9206f1a_b.jpg
City Pop: 741,206 / Metro (Tarrant County) Pop: over 2 mil.... 'nuff said

But MY question is..... what's up with the cities on this list?

New York?
Chicago?
Houston?
Philly?


.... these cities have the right sized skyline for the size of the city, maybe more so.

Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Seattle, and (now) Detroit are lucky to have what they have now.

L.A. could be debatable, but it looks better when you're closer.... and you can actually see it.


Maybe 2 or 3 of the cities on the list could be understandable, but where's Phoenix? Where's D.C.? Where's El Paso or San Jose or Fort Worth?
I think ya just picked cities EVERYONE knew instead of cities that have 'undersized' skylines.


And someone mentioned San Diego. That city has height restrictions, but they still work with what they have.

Last edited by JMT; 08-13-2012 at 07:19 PM..

 
Old 10-31-2011, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Jefferson City 4 days a week, St. Louis 3 days a week
2,709 posts, read 5,105,276 times
Reputation: 1028
Phoenix I think is the ultimate example of a pathetic skyline for a city its size. I'm surprised New York and Chicago appeared on this list...their skylines perfectly reflect their size. As for Pittsburgh, I actually think they may have too big a skyline for a city their size...same thing for Seattle. St. Louis' skyline is also fairly small, at least looking across the river at Illinois. Looking at it from the south or north makes it seem a good size. Also, if the Arch had not imposed a height restrictions of 630 feet on buildings here, my guess is our skyline would be even larger.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,936,508 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by stlouisan View Post
Also, if the Arch had not imposed a height restrictions of 630 feet on buildings here, my guess is our skyline would be even larger.
I always thought that was an urban myth, wasn't there a supertall proposed for downtown in the early 2000's?
 
Old 10-31-2011, 12:58 PM
 
14,041 posts, read 15,073,711 times
Reputation: 10503
Providence RI has the oldest Tallest building of any city over 150,000 in American, 1926, the BOA building.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 01:01 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,364,757 times
Reputation: 2975
Angry Middle America arguing with durf again...
 
Old 10-31-2011, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Texas
431 posts, read 930,636 times
Reputation: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Jose's Finest View Post
You see how dense Dt. San Jose's skyline is, albeit shorter. I believe there's one more picture from Bill Cobb that's even a better picture of Dt. San Jose and shows more high-rises in the picture that wasn't included but can be looked at by going to skyline scenes.com. Remember, they've added 5 more towers since then and some still are not shown, too. It's just as impressive as Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, if not even more impressive.

If you guys like 70 story towers, then I can see your point. The tallest in SJ is 28 story Marriott's hotel.
Well your username says it all... That's great you have a lot of Civic pride and all that good stuff. As do I for my Hometown. That being said not too many people are going to agree with you on this one. Ive been to all the Cities mentioned including San Jose and it doesn't even come close to the others. Heck even the Texas Medical Center in Houston, all by itself blows away San Jose.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 01:32 PM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,149,816 times
Reputation: 4936
As much as I can't wait to move to LA in two-three months from now, there is no getting around it, its downtown and skyline is quite small for a city its size. Its just a fact. Although of course there are tons of smaller skylines all over LA county.

Why in the world, someone would put Chicago up there is beyond me. Chicagos skyline can almost be described as too large for a city of its size. Like its almost deceiving.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 01:47 PM
 
55 posts, read 75,483 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Right Side_TX View Post
Well your username says it all... That's great you have a lot of Civic pride and all that good stuff. As do I for my Hometown. That being said not too many people are going to agree with you on this one. Ive been to all the Cities mentioned including San Jose and it doesn't even come close to the others. Heck even the Texas Medical Center in Houston, all by itself blows away San Jose.
Neither does downtown Houston.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 01:48 PM
 
55 posts, read 75,483 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
Seriously!?! HA HA HA HA HA HA are you joking? Uptown Dallas alone looks so much better than Downtown San Jose.

So San Jose looks like this or better?

Credit http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6154/...970586cd_o.jpg (this photo isn't mine)



Credit http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6018/...45539172_b.jpg (this photo isn't mine)



Credit http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3519/...000livestx.jpg (this photo isn't mine)



Credit http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2703/...2ddc7011_b.jpg (this photo isn't mine)



Credit http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/z.../DallasRAW.jpg (this photo isn't mine)
I have to say San Jose's is a little better since it's more dense. Dallas is just taller with 71 story tower.
 
Old 10-31-2011, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,726 posts, read 9,975,081 times
Reputation: 3469
Quote:
Originally Posted by cityvine View Post
I have to say San Jose's is a little better since it's more dense. Dallas is just taller with 71 story tower.
Without it Dallas still has a taller skyline. The 2nd tallest building in Dallas is the Renaissance Tower, it's 56 stories/886 ft. That's 35 ft shorter than the Bank of America Plaza (tallest building).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top