Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, or Pheonix??
Houston 25 10.68%
Dallas 25 10.68%
Atlanta 35 14.96%
Pheonix 86 36.75%
All of the above 63 26.92%
Voters: 234. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2010, 10:45 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,839,439 times
Reputation: 3101

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
Look at what DFW's growth will result in!


YouTube - Dallas Ft. Worth and Texas Road Building Innovations
The video is very nice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2010, 10:51 PM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,613 posts, read 10,143,894 times
Reputation: 7969
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
I am curious about Atlanta's growth. What portion of the growth is actual population growth within a static boundary (comparing apples to apples)and what portion is from adding to the MSA/CSA? It just seems to me that Atlanta's MSA physical size is gigantic and all those added counties must have accumulated over time. Has any of it been added since 2000?

I just looked up the others on wikipedia and the Atlanta MSA is the smallest of the group at 8376 square miles. On the opposite end is Phoenix at over 16,000 square miles. Sheesh!

I don't know how many times this has to be focused on, but here it goes again for those who haven't done their research.

Please understand that although the Phoenix MSA is listed at over 16,000, it most certainly is mostly barren desert land. The actual urban area of Phoenix is much smaller than that. Anybody who's been to Phoenix understands that once you're outside of the urban area, you're out in the desert.

(From Wiki) - The Census Bureau defines a metropolitan area as the core city plus its county and any nearby counties that are economically dependent on the core city. However, Arizona has relatively large counties and a harsh, rugged desert landscape. For these reasons, much of the land that is part of the Metropolitan Statistical Area is rural or completely uninhabited. The core part of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area is the Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona Urban Area, which is far smaller than the Metropolitan Statistical Area.

If you look at this link: List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (although with figures from 2000), it shows the actual sizes for the urban areas, and Phoenix clearly is not the worst offender when it comes to sprawl.

Understanding Phoenix: Not as Sprawled as You Think | Newgeography.com

Last edited by AZLiam; 03-08-2010 at 11:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,739,757 times
Reputation: 10592
^^^True. Of the cities mentioned, Atlanta's urban area is the least dense. However the city of Atlanta is more dense than the others. Not that its a bad thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Charlotte again!!
1,037 posts, read 2,047,500 times
Reputation: 533
The city of Atlanta is definitely alot more dense than the other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 09:48 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,952,147 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by qc dreamin View Post
The city of Atlanta is definitely alot more dense than the other cities.
It isn't a lot denser than the other cities. Barely denser, and that just recently happened a year or two ago, when the city was growing from all of the new developments (which is a great thing). The Inner Loop of Houston is 96 square miles, with around 600K, IIRC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,731 posts, read 14,361,576 times
Reputation: 2774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface713 View Post
It isn't a lot denser than the other cities. Barely denser, and that just recently happened a year or two ago, when the city was growing from all of the new developments (which is a great thing). The Inner Loop of Houston is 96 square miles, with around 600K, IIRC.
It's not really that recent at all.

Yes, there is an amazing amount of new infill development - but there are also Census tracts in Poncey-Highlands that approach 24,000 psm, and this is an older, stable intown neighborhood that really hasn't seen much new residential growth.

I don't even live in the City, but in an unincorporated area of DeKalb adjacent to it, and my Census tract is over 4,900 psm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 10:31 AM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,839,439 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAnative10 View Post
^^^True. Of the cities mentioned, Atlanta's urban area is the least dense. However the city of Atlanta is more dense than the others. Not that its a bad thing.
This I think works as an advantage to Atlanta to a certain extent. The smaller the less you have to deal with. Houston has a lot more problems but also a much larger tax base than both Dallas & Atlanta. So I guess its a catch 22 situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,206,894 times
Reputation: 7428
I personally don't see how having a larger land area makes a difference. All have pretty bad sprawl within their cities limits which blends in with the sprawl outside of the limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnatl View Post
It's not really that recent at all.

Yes, there is an amazing amount of new infill development - but there are also Census tracts in Poncey-Highlands that approach 24,000 psm, and this is an older, stable intown neighborhood that really hasn't seen much new residential growth.

I don't even live in the City, but in an unincorporated area of DeKalb adjacent to it, and my Census tract is over 4,900 psm.
He's saying that Houston and Dallas was denser than Atlanta at census 2000. It just recently passed Houston in 2008 according to the estimates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2010, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,731 posts, read 14,361,576 times
Reputation: 2774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
He's saying that Houston and Dallas was denser than Atlanta at census 2000. It just recently passed Houston in 2008 according to the estimates.
Got it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top