Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think NYC will still be the largest city in 2050?
Yes 628 81.56%
No 142 18.44%
Voters: 770. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2011, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,329,664 times
Reputation: 13298

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jorge112597 View Post
LA can be 8 to maybe 9 million with its density increasing rapidly and lots of development going on, in 40 years
I highly doubt that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2011, 04:31 PM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,133,032 times
Reputation: 119
Yeah I'm very sure Atlanta's going to replace LA as the cultural center of the US. After that, LA will have nothing positive to be famous for. LA going to crest at 4 million and then fall back down. I can easily Atlanta making the top 10 but not the top 5. My top 5:
1.NY
2. Austin
3. Charlotte
4. San Jose
5. Philly.

But only assuming sunbelts r still popular then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2011, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,329,664 times
Reputation: 13298
What in the?

Austin and Charlotte!!!??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2011, 05:11 PM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,133,032 times
Reputation: 119
They r increasing fast!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2011, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,329,664 times
Reputation: 13298
Little too hopeful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 10:19 AM
 
Location: L.A./O.C.
573 posts, read 1,361,626 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor123 View Post
They r increasing fast!
what ??????? LA is not going to fall back and atlanta wont even pass the 2 million mark
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,967,780 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor123 View Post
Yeah I'm very sure Atlanta's going to replace LA as the cultural center of the US. After that, LA will have nothing positive to be famous for. LA going to crest at 4 million and then fall back down. I can easily Atlanta making the top 10 but not the top 5. My top 5:
1.NY
2. Austin
3. Charlotte
4. San Jose
5. Philly.

But only assuming sunbelts r still popular then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor123 View Post
They r increasing fast!
They are increasing fast but nowhere near as fast as LA, Houston, Chicago, Detroit and a few others.

How on earth is Austin or Charlotte gonna pass a city 3 times as large as itself while only adding the same number of people that that city adds. You think adding 150K a decade is gonna make Austin Catch up to Houston, Chicago in 40 years??? That is only 600K in the 40 years. add that to Austin's population and it still won't be half of Chicago or Houstons population.

San Jose is even worse off. San Jose only gained a third of the people Houston gained last decade so it needs a hella mighty push to even begin catching up.

In 40 years I see SJ falling off the top ten along with Dallas.

NY will still be number one
LA will still be number two.
Houston and Chicago will be brawling it out for number 3, loser gets number 4
San Antonio is most probably gonna pass Phoenix and most certainly Philly for number 5.
Phoenix is probably gonna be number 6
San Diego number 7
Philadelphia number 8
Austin number 9
Forth worth number 10
Jacksonville will probably be right behind at 11
Charlotte at 12
San Jose at 13
Dallas at 14
Indianapolis at 15
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,561,459 times
Reputation: 12157
I don't see Dallas falling out the top 10 and if Fort Worth doesnt address their infrastructure, they will hit a wall very hard. But even if Dallas does fall, it will be far more urban and dense than Fort Worth or Austin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,967,780 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I don't see Dallas falling out the top 10 and if Fort Worth doesnt address their infrastructure, they will hit a wall very hard. But even if Dallas does fall, it will be far more urban and dense than Fort Worth or Austin.
I don't want to get into foolishness like more urban and density. That would just kill the thread. it is just a stupid straw-man that people on CD use to kill threads by detracting from the topic at hand.

And Dallas is already falling. you think with the stagnant growth it has been having while the others speed up you think it is just gonna sit there holding the spot while the others don't go around it.

In the last two decades Dallas has dropped from 7th to 9th and was passed like lightening by Phoenix San Diego and San Antonio.

It may not drop out of the top ten like a rock like Baltimore, Cleveland and DC did a couple of decades ago, but it certainly isn't gonna stay in the top ten if it doesn't start attracting people away from its burbs and into its central city.

FW does not need to address no darn infrastructure. They have lots of potential for growth via annexation, and they are currently pursuing a vigorous annexation plan like they did last decade
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2011, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,561,459 times
Reputation: 12157
Dallas isn't falling. It's just growing slowly. Dallas is maturing if anything. It's has already seen the growth that Fort Worth is experiencing. The Dallas side of the metroplex grew faster than the FW side.

Yes FW needs to fix its infrastructure or it will deserve the futur it gets. So the only way FW can grow is by annexation? That's ridiculoust. That's why FW is far mire suburban than Dallas is now. Dallas also has open land as well. Dallas will see fast growth itself in the near future. It won't fall out the top 10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top