Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:07 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,749,798 times
Reputation: 3120

Advertisements

I realize I'm about to sound extremely ignorant but... every time I see pictures of houses in East Cleveland, Bridgeport, Highland Park MI, Hartford, etc I can't help but notice that the houses are ****ing huge. People say that they don't get why LA is bad because of the palm trees and green lawns and the fact that they have backyards... why are the houses in these places huge? In Philly, NY and Chicago the houses aren't huge and they look the part, but that's because they're denser. I realize that housing is a lot cheaper in the midwest but... if you're already living in gigantic houses then why do people always say that the east coast slums look terrible?


Pictures I'm referencing:





^East Cleveland




^Highland Park





^Bridgeport


Compare that to LA or the bay...

Even Oakland, which has the most east coast-looking architecture in CA, isn't like that...







^Watts



http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/6333/brookdaleave4.jpg (broken link)



^Fruitvale District Oakland



I'd rather live in a big house than a shack...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:11 PM
 
2,419 posts, read 4,722,624 times
Reputation: 1318
Because the slums of most cities started off as affluent suburbs, and thier remnants remain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:11 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,326,876 times
Reputation: 6231
I've noticed that too, I think it's because those places weren't always bad. I know my old neighborhood used to be nice up until the 70's, it's still bad but not crack-era bad, there's some big houses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:16 PM
 
Location: NYC, VA, JP
910 posts, read 1,083,788 times
Reputation: 1053
Those were most likely converted into duplexes. && in bad shape, since they're so old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:17 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,749,798 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
Because the slums of most cities started off as affluent suburbs, and thier remnants remain.

True...

Having been to Gary and Chitown numerous times, though, some of these other places still look like the suburbs in comparison. It's when you're actually there that you know they're not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:17 PM
 
93,255 posts, read 123,876,708 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
Because the slums of most cities started off as affluent suburbs, and thier remnants remain.
True, as many were streetcars suburbs that were annexed into the city or were neighborhoods that were the affluent parts of the city in their earlier stages or booms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:34 PM
 
902 posts, read 2,787,331 times
Reputation: 375
Most of these neighborhoods that are dangerous today used to be affluent communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:36 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,935,022 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
Because the slums of most cities started off as affluent suburbs, and thier remnants remain.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,717 posts, read 8,183,607 times
Reputation: 892
Yeah it's called "white flight".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2010, 09:38 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,935,022 times
Reputation: 4565
Like MANY above have said, most of these ghettos were once upper-middle class suburbs prior to the 70's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top