Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2010, 10:29 AM
 
161 posts, read 699,466 times
Reputation: 105

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjacobeclark View Post
I'm talking population. NYC has 22 million in its metro, LA has 18 million, London has 13 million, Paris has 10 million, Tokyo has 33 million, Mexico D.F. has 25 million, and São Paolo has 20 million.
If you were to measure the size of the Metropolitan area of New York to that of either London or Paris, you'd find both areas are considerably smaller than New York's. I don't know what the exact recalculated population would be if you had the Metro areas equal in size, but I have to assume London's would be closer to 20 million (seeing as though Brighton, Oxford, Portsmouth, Reading, and many other cities and surrounding suburbs would be included into that count).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2010, 10:32 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,191,557 times
Reputation: 11355
^ it's been done for London using the USA standards. It was somewhere between 18 and 19 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Lower East Side, Milwaukee, WI
2,943 posts, read 5,073,472 times
Reputation: 1113
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
This just goes to show that size, while important, isn't all that matters. Do Mexico City and Sao Paolo have the wealth and global importance of NYC?
No, and neither do Paris and London.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 11:52 AM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,390,781 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjacobeclark View Post
No, and neither do Paris and London.
I would argue that London has the financial/wealth importance of New York City; while Paris can match NYC in terms of Cultural importance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:16 PM
 
2,419 posts, read 4,723,143 times
Reputation: 1318
Quote:
Originally Posted by mammamia01 View Post
Tell it to Chicagoans, many of them believe Chicago is just like New York only smaller and cleaner
Chicago is like a smaller pre-giuliani NYC.

Like a NYC with heart.

NYC is still the $hit and has no real comparison in the US, but its no secret that NYC today is thoroughly feminized and disneyfied. Like one gigantic urban themed amusement park for suburban tourists.

Its a place for the rich not the working class that built it.

If you wanna find "real" New Yorkers go to Jersey, Philly, and the working class parts of Conn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Lower East Side, Milwaukee, WI
2,943 posts, read 5,073,472 times
Reputation: 1113
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
I would argue that London has the financial/wealth importance of New York City; while Paris can match NYC in terms of Cultural importance.
Well, I'm going to have to disagree with you on London. Both LA and Chicago have larger GDP's than London or Paris. São Paolo fared much better than I would have expected them to.

List of cities by GDP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PWC
2008 est.($BN)
1. Tokyo, Japan $1479
2. New York City, United States $1406
3. Los Angeles, United States $792
4. Chicago, United States $574
5. London, United Kingdom $565
6. Paris, France $564
7. Osaka, Japan $417
8. Mexico City, Mexico$390
9. Philadelphia, United States $388
10. São Paulo, Brazil $388
11. Washington D.C., United States $375
12. Boston, United States $363
13. Buenos Aires, Argentina $362
14. Dallas, United States $338
15. Moscow, Russia $321
16. Hong Kong, China $320
17. Atlanta, United States $304
18. San Francisco, United States $301
19. Houston, United States $297
20. Miami, United States $292

As far as culture goes, that's a very hard thing to judge. Paris and London have forever left their mark on the literary world, but who still reads books in this day and age? I guess London with the BBC can match NYC as the world's news capitals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:22 PM
 
2,419 posts, read 4,723,143 times
Reputation: 1318
Dallas and ATL worth more than SF. I learned something today
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:22 PM
 
9 posts, read 7,353 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
NYC is still the $hit and has no real comparison in the US, but its no secret that NYC today is thoroughly feminized and disneyfied. Like one gigantic urban themed amusement park for suburban tourists.

Its a place for the rich not the working class that built it.

If you wanna find "real" New Yorkers go to Jersey, Philly, and the working class parts of Conn.
"Feminized"? "Disneyfied"? "Urban themed amusement park"? 10M very REAL people live in this amusement park, from the richest to the poorest. Most of them working class, even if it means 300K a year or a few millions a year.
What's up with this communist propaganda?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:24 PM
 
2,419 posts, read 4,723,143 times
Reputation: 1318
Quote:
Originally Posted by mammamia01 View Post
"Feminized"? "Disneyfied"? "Urban themed amusement park"? 10M very REAL people live in this amusement park, from the richest to the poorest. Most of them working class, even if it means 300K a year or a few millions a year.
What's up with this communist propaganda?
NYC might be the only major US city to have back to back republican mayors. Nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2010, 12:36 PM
 
9 posts, read 7,353 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
NYC might be the only major US city to have back to back republican mayors. Nuff said.
"Nuff said"? What was that supposed to mean? Most American cities would die to have mayors of the same caliber as Gulliani and Bloomberg...

As opposed to most cities and despite all criticism, New York prospers and grows. It's better than ever before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top