Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2019, 02:09 PM
 
885 posts, read 625,518 times
Reputation: 1827

Advertisements

Earlier this year, Pres. Trump proposed a plan to take $2 billion out of the Pell Grant program.


The purpose of this program is to afford college grants to students from families with less than $50,000 in annual income.


His rationale for removing this $2 billion is to help pay for NASA to make a return trip to the moon.


The maximum Pell Grant once covered nearly 80% of the cost of tuition, fees, and room and board at public four-year colleges. Now, it covers less than 30%.


This is a program which needs more funding, not less.

Last edited by Nearwest; 12-10-2019 at 02:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2019, 08:51 PM
 
8,299 posts, read 3,813,817 times
Reputation: 5919
The way pell grants are set up are ineffective. We hand them out to a lot of students that don't use them effectively. We also hand them out to a lot of students that aren't going to achieve academic success.

I had seen it suggested, and I fully support, that we provide loans instead of grants. If the student completes an academic area of study, then the loan (a portion or whole depending on financial situation) gets converted to a grant. Unfortunately, we have too many students that never complete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2019, 10:30 AM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,651,436 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nearwest View Post
This is a program which needs more funding, not less.
Nope. Because of programs such as the Pell Grant, retail tuition rates are higher than they otherwise would be.

The solution is to reduce the price of tuition, not give universities carte blanch to increase tuition by saying "you can get a big fat Pell grant that makes up the difference."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2019, 12:07 PM
 
8,299 posts, read 3,813,817 times
Reputation: 5919
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
Nope. Because of programs such as the Pell Grant, retail tuition rates are higher than they otherwise would be.

The solution is to reduce the price of tuition, not give universities carte blanch to increase tuition by saying "you can get a big fat Pell grant that makes up the difference."
"retail tuition" was lower than it should have been since WWII. They are just catching up to the normal rates now.


I agree that we need to stop all subsidies (including pell grants) to universities. Let the ones that cannot survive fold. The good schools have endowments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top