Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:09 AM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 14 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,190 posts, read 9,327,431 times
Reputation: 25656

Advertisements

https://gazette.com/premium/high-cou...6f9443009.html

"A Texas court ruling this month declared the ACA unconstitutional, but the decision won’t impact enrollments for 2019 coverage in Colorado. The ruling is likely to be appealed and ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats, meanwhile, buoyed by 2018 midterm election victories, have promised to stabilize Obamacare and expand Medicaid.

But that’s all a lot of noise across much of rural Colorado, where only one or two ACA coverage options usually are available and plans for a family of five can run north of $2,000 a month.

In mountain-resort counties, everything from groceries to gas to housing costs significantly more than along the Front Range. It can be difficult for a family of five to live on $117,680, the income cap ($48,560 for individuals) to qualify for ACA tax credits that subsidize insurance.

In Eagle County, home of ritzy Vail and Beaver Creek, the only ACA options are Anthem and Kaiser. Before tax credits, a “bronze” Kaiser plan — an individual plan with lower premiums but higher co-pay costs and often higher deductibles — costs about $2,200 a month for a family of five, and a similar Anthem plan runs more than $2,900. Their deductibles exceed $6,500.

In Denver, the cheapest similar coverage for that family of five is a Bright Health Bronze Plan for just under $1,650 a month — the same price as a bronze Kaiser plan in El Paso County, before tax credits."


Clearly, ACA plans for people who are not subsidized by the gov't are not affordable.

For example, if you are self employed, have a family, and make $100K, paying more than one third of that gross income for health insurance is an unsustainable expense. Something will have to give.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2018, 06:32 AM
 
2,289 posts, read 2,948,020 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
For example, if you are self employed, have a family, and make $100K, paying more than one third of that gross income for health insurance is an unsustainable expense. Something will have to give.
The family will either have to move to the front range or one of the adults will have to get a job that includes insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis, East Side
3,070 posts, read 2,405,369 times
Reputation: 8456
You mean insurance costs for a maintenance plan, not health care costs. You can pay the premiums without ever seeing a doctor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 08:42 AM
 
1,190 posts, read 1,197,116 times
Reputation: 2320
I think Obamacare works fine for the majority that use it.

My house has been paid off for a few years and now I really don't care to work very hard (if at all) so I never make more than $20k/year.

I LOVE my free healthcare - thank you Mr. Obama!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 08:55 AM
 
385 posts, read 324,436 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
https://gazette.com/premium/high-cou...6f9443009.html

"A Texas court ruling this month declared the ACA unconstitutional, but the decision won’t impact enrollments for 2019 coverage in Colorado. The ruling is likely to be appealed and ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats, meanwhile, buoyed by 2018 midterm election victories, have promised to stabilize Obamacare and expand Medicaid.

But that’s all a lot of noise across much of rural Colorado, where only one or two ACA coverage options usually are available and plans for a family of five can run north of $2,000 a month.

In mountain-resort counties, everything from groceries to gas to housing costs significantly more than along the Front Range. It can be difficult for a family of five to live on $117,680, the income cap ($48,560 for individuals) to qualify for ACA tax credits that subsidize insurance.

In Eagle County, home of ritzy Vail and Beaver Creek, the only ACA options are Anthem and Kaiser. Before tax credits, a “bronze” Kaiser plan — an individual plan with lower premiums but higher co-pay costs and often higher deductibles — costs about $2,200 a month for a family of five, and a similar Anthem plan runs more than $2,900. Their deductibles exceed $6,500.

In Denver, the cheapest similar coverage for that family of five is a Bright Health Bronze Plan for just under $1,650 a month — the same price as a bronze Kaiser plan in El Paso County, before tax credits."


Clearly, ACA plans for people who are not subsidized by the gov't are not affordable.

For example, if you are self employed, have a family, and make $100K, paying more than one third of that gross income for health insurance is an unsustainable expense. Something will have to give.
"Something will have to give."

Yes, and that "something" is "someone" which means we, the consumers.

There is no one minding the store, or the hen house, or whatever you want to call it. This is not some grand conspiracy; it is simply the influence of way too much money in politics. Both parties take "campaign donations" from the pharmaceutical industry (even Democrats do -- I'm talking about you, Corey Booker, who blocked Sander's bill to allow importation of cheaper drugs into the U.S.: https://theintercept.com/2017/01/12/...e-from-canada/).

If you are in the range of 50-64, and make a good salary and are self-employed, then you get absolutely hosed by the ACA. To say that the ACA is better than what we had before is almost meaningless -- a terribly low bar of comparison. Yes, I am grateful that it expanded coverage for pre-existing conditions . . .

You would be surprised how quickly things would improve is the members of Congress were having to secure their healthcare coverage the same way that the average citizen does.

I still hope that eventually, we will somehow, short of total meltdown, get Medicare for All.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 09:13 AM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 14 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,190 posts, read 9,327,431 times
Reputation: 25656
Quote:
Originally Posted by LHS79 View Post
I think Obamacare works fine for the majority that use it.

My house has been paid off for a few years and now I really don't care to work very hard (if at all) so I never make more than $20k/year.

I LOVE my free healthcare - thank you Mr. Obama!!
Yup, that's a great way to game the system. They don't count assets, just income. You can choose your income level. If your expenses are low, you can live on $20K per year.

The ACA works only for those people who qualify for Medicaid or who make a low enough income to get a subsidy.

If you make a middle class income, say $100K and you are about 60, you are so screwed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,730,962 times
Reputation: 13170
I guess I'm glad I moved from Colorado to Denmark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 04:37 PM
 
2,486 posts, read 2,708,268 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frihed89 View Post
I guess I'm glad I moved from Colorado to Denmark.
Where everything, but healthcare is more expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 05:47 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,741 posts, read 58,090,525 times
Reputation: 46231
Can buy a lot of Danish Pastries for $30k / yr not wasted on HC premiums (not including actual health care COSTS ,,,/ co-pays / prescriptions , all are over-and-above-HC-premiums (HC premiums are a useless expense, EXCEPT to buy you access (for limited care / duration))

A(?)CA is not affordable to those who don't take don't want t milk out a subsidy.

A(?)CA very much a Robinhood - re-distribution of wealth. Absolutely NOT a viable solution.

(more political Smoke and mirrors)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Arizona
1,013 posts, read 978,755 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by LHS79 View Post
I think Obamacare works fine for the majority that use it.

My house has been paid off for a few years and now I really don't care to work very hard (if at all) so I never make more than $20k/year.

I LOVE my free healthcare - thank you Mr. Obama!!
Are you using Obamacare or Medicaid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top