Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-02-2011, 03:42 PM
 
31 posts, read 58,254 times
Reputation: 34

Advertisements

Hi,

I purchased new construction, single family residential, in Stamford in Q4 2010. A couple of months back I received a notice from the tax office advising me that my property taxes had been increased due to phase-in of the 2007 re-valuation. Now, I hear that Stamford will be conducting ANOTHER re-valuation for the October 2012 Grand List. Putting aside for the moment that the present Grand List assessment on my home is approximately 30% over the appraised value at closing, how can the City now have a SECOND revaluation? Is the practical effect that the city will lower assessments but increase residential mill rates? It's pretty clear that residential values in the City/suburbs are anywhere from 25-35% lower than in the boom years.

As an aside, I intend to appeal the '07 valuation next March, which is the first stautory opportunity. I know how those proceedings typically go but the fact that the appraisal vs valuation is so egregiously out of whack.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2011, 04:30 PM
 
Location: West End-Hartford
625 posts, read 2,050,699 times
Reputation: 377
State law requires towns to revalue every 5 years. Some towns did a "phase-in" of the most recent revaluation because values (and subsequently taxes) jumped so much based on the heated real estate market. I would expect future revaluations to show lower property values but we can't really expect taxes to lower because expenses won't be going down, so mill rates will most likely just increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2011, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Coastal Connecticut
21,758 posts, read 28,086,032 times
Reputation: 6711
My town conveniently uses 2006 property values at the moment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2011, 06:06 PM
 
680 posts, read 1,576,020 times
Reputation: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmyBergquist View Post
State law requires towns to revalue every 5 years. Some towns did a "phase-in" of the most recent revaluation because values (and subsequently taxes) jumped so much based on the heated real estate market. I would expect future revaluations to show lower property values but we can't really expect taxes to lower because expenses won't be going down, so mill rates will most likely just increase.
I saw most Westport homes got taxes reduced after their latest evaluation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2011, 06:43 PM
 
Location: In a house
5,232 posts, read 8,415,423 times
Reputation: 2583
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmyBergquist View Post
State law requires towns to revalue every 5 years. Some towns did a "phase-in" of the most recent revaluation because values (and subsequently taxes) jumped so much based on the heated real estate market. I would expect future revaluations to show lower property values but we can't really expect taxes to lower because expenses won't be going down, so mill rates will most likely just increase.

Why cant expenses go down? Because we accept that they cant, weird world we have let this turn into when the people we pay tell us what we need to spend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,939 posts, read 56,958,583 times
Reputation: 11229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Knocker View Post
Why cant expenses go down? Because we accept that they cant, weird world we have let this turn into when the people we pay tell us what we need to spend.
No, it is because people do not want to give up services. You may htink that things like schools and libraries can be cut but others do not agree. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top