Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2014, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Looks like I'm getting out "Valley On The Sun" Arizona
190 posts, read 415,861 times
Reputation: 224

Advertisements

Lowe’s pays $1.6M settlement over 2×4 labeling


You got to be kidding me....why isn't the judge,lawyers and all others participates tossed out of the court room? Can it get more frivolous than this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2014, 01:31 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,631,426 times
Reputation: 22232
I'm just waiting for them to protect California consumers against doughnut fraud. There are no nuts in doughnuts, and they are not labeled as such.

Additionally, when are they going to correct this major issue of calling places where people park their cars driveways. They need to sue the home builders until they change the name to parkway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 01:33 PM
 
Location: southern kansas
9,127 posts, read 9,381,258 times
Reputation: 21297
Dimensional lumber, and even plywood & paneling has actually been something less than the 'call size' since at least as far back as the late 60's when I started in RV manufacturing. But it's suddenly an issue now? A classic 'frivolous law suit' if there ever was one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 05:55 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,497,250 times
Reputation: 1406
Lowe's got off cheap without the FTC making a federal case out of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 06:42 AM
 
29,506 posts, read 14,668,503 times
Reputation: 14458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woundedknee View Post
Lowe’s pays $1.6M settlement over 2×4 labeling


You got to be kidding me....why isn't the judge,lawyers and all others participates tossed out of the court room? Can it get more frivolous than this?
Just another thing in the demise of our society... proof that idiocracy is on both sides of the bench.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 07:09 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,497,250 times
Reputation: 1406
Truth in advertising and consumer protection are not frivolous matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 08:54 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,023,656 times
Reputation: 15645
Angry Money grab plain and simple

This was extortion at the end of a gavel, nothing more nothing less. The statement that floored me was “Consumers should expect when making product purchases that retailers are providing accurate information,” said Marin County District Attorney Edward S. Berberian. “Especially when misinformation could adversely affect building projects that more often than not rely on precise measurements.”

If anyone who's building something doesn't know how to use a tape measure to be sure it's the right height or length when put in place then they deserve the project they end up with.
Why people do business in CA at all is a constant case of wonderment for me.



Read more at LITIGATION NATION: Lowe’s pays $1.6M settlement over 2×4 labeling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 09:18 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,497,250 times
Reputation: 1406
It's a big deal. Every year, millions of Americans are bilked out of billions of dollars through false and misleading advertising and the failure to enforce consumer protection laws. We should be glad that someone is finally doing something about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 09:34 AM
 
1,075 posts, read 1,773,178 times
Reputation: 1961
California may be the land of fruits and nuts, but I actually agree with the court on this one (although not necessarily the amount of monetary damages).

A 1.5 x 3.5 inch beam is not the same as a 2 x 4 beam. If you are buying large quantities of them for a building, it could really cause problems or cost money. First of all, you'd have to pay someone to spend time measuring all of them to see if you really got what you needed - a smaller beam would have less structural strength and may not meet the requirements of the architect or structural engineer. It could also mess up overall dimensions of the building. If they got the wrong size, they'd have to take time to return them to the store, which costs the builders money.

Even flat screen TVs give actual dimensions in addition to saying "48 Inch Class" or something like that. And the size of a TV is much less important unless football is on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 09:43 AM
 
17,629 posts, read 17,696,894 times
Reputation: 25703
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV8n View Post
California may be the land of fruits and nuts, but I actually agree with the court on this one (although not necessarily the amount of monetary damages).

A 1.5 x 3.5 inch beam is not the same as a 2 x 4 beam. If you are buying large quantities of them for a building, it could really cause problems or cost money. First of all, you'd have to pay someone to spend time measuring all of them to see if you really got what you needed - a smaller beam would have less structural strength and may not meet the requirements of the architect or structural engineer. It could also mess up overall dimensions of the building. If they got the wrong size, they'd have to take time to return them to the store, which costs the builders money.

Even flat screen TVs give actual dimensions in addition to saying "48 Inch Class" or something like that. And the size of a TV is much less important unless football is on.
TVs don't expand and contract in size based upon the amount of moisture contained inside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top