Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it me, or have 80% of all this type of cases over the last several years involved an older woman? At least that what I read in the news. Maybe older guys don't get the same publicity, I don't know. Almost 90% of teacher-student cases involve female teachers, by my estimation.
Not sure I follow all this. The guy is now 22 or 23. We are likely into only the 2008/9 era and there is likely a statute of limitation.. In some places in the US a 15 yo is legal.
And it is not pedophilia. Rather Ephebophilia the version for late teens.
A 15 year old (boy or girl) is well capable of sexual acts. They can ejaculate or orgasm, experience full sexual pleasure and have sexual fantasies just as much as 25 year old would. The boy obviously consented, so it's laughable to call it rape. And, might I add that, the boy is no angel himself.
Calling this a pedophile act spits on actual pedophilia - You know, when the culprit is like 30 and their victim is 10. Now that is pedophilia and the exploitation of an innocent child. And that is when you lock up the offender for life.
I personally believe that if a 15 year old consents to sex, there shouldn't be any arrests or convictions made to the adult. Sorry if this sounds messed up or "politically incorrect". We all have been 15 in our lives and have had sexual cravings for older people. We were NOT innocent.
Sure, now I do not condone this. It should still be a taboo and get backlash -- Mostly at the fact that this was incestuous in nature. But will I jail the "rapist"? Of course not.
P.S. Say, when will the Law realize that back in the day people were around 13-17 when they married and had children?
A 15 year old boy (or girl) is well capable of sexual acts. (S)he can ejaculate or orgasm, experience full sexual pleasure and have sexual fantasies just as much as 25 year old would. The boy obviously consented, so this isn't rape. And, might I add that, the boy is no angel himself.
Calling this a pedophile case spits on actual pedophilia - You know, when the culprit is like 30 and his victim is 10. Now that is pedophilia and the exploitation of an innocent child.
If a 15 year old consents to sex, there shouldn't be any arrests or convictions. Sorry if this sounds messed up or "politically correct". We all have been 15 in our lives and have had sexual cravings for older people. We were NOT innocent.
Sure, now I do not condone this. It should still be a taboo and get backlash. But will I jail the "rapist"? Of course not.
P.S. When will the Law realize that back in the day people were around 13-17 when they married and had children?
Heartily agree^^^
M or F a teenager who consents, who is not being threatened/intimidated, is not in fear of the older party, is NOT a rape victim, and the older party, M or F, is not a pedo in my opinion.
YES I apply this to M/F in either role.
Those who class teens the same as child victims of adult pedos are indeed insulting these child victims.
Teens are often sexually aggressive creatures, the whole gross "MILF" acronym is common in teen vernacular, this is hardly a case of some wee innocent lad.
Same goes for girls, teen girls aplenty are footloose and fancy free with their sexual behavior and have many partners, often are the initiators, surely this is commonly known.
I think it's weird and disgusting that a teen boy would want to bang his old bag of an aunt, and desperate and sick and prob twistedly ego stroking motivated of her to want him, but I don't see this as a pedo/victim thing, just two disgusting freaks whose freakishness suited each other.
Heartily agree^^^
M or F a teenager who consents, who is not being threatened/intimidated, is not in fear of the older party, is NOT a rape victim, and the older party, M or F, is not a pedo in my opinion.
YES I apply this to M/F in either role.
Those who class teens the same as child victims of adult pedos are indeed insulting these child victims.
Teens are often sexually aggressive creatures, the whole gross "MILF" acronym is common in teen vernacular, this is hardly a case of some wee innocent lad.
Same goes for girls, teen girls aplenty are footloose and fancy free with their sexual behavior and have many partners, often are the initiators, surely this is commonly known.
I think it's weird and disgusting that a teen boy would want to bang his old bag of an aunt, and desperate and sick and prob twistedly ego stroking motivated of her to want him, but I don't see this as a pedo/victim thing, just two disgusting freaks whose freakishness suited each other.
its funny 100 years ago, 16 year old already had two kids, today different
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.