Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Happened in Washington (state).......someone posted in comments that loss prevention in that state can legally and forcibly detain shoplifters and thieves but some think they should have just let her run away and called police.
Looks like she created the situation by her own criminal behavior. Assuming loss prevention can legally and forcibly detain her, she made a bad situation worse by resisting. Was loss prevention supposed to let her just walk?
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 11 days ago)
35,637 posts, read 17,989,189 times
Reputation: 50679
This story is confusing. She's been charged with "second degree robbery", which is a felony.
The store states she stole "items". What, exactly, DID she attempt to steal?
I'm not usually on the side of using force, but she was stealing something and thought she could just walk away - which I've seen thieves do. I've seen those theft alarms go off, and out the person goes with whatever merchandise they feel like taking, and no one has the right to do anything about it. The public thinks no one will ever do anything except watch thieves take stuff.
Share this video over and over, and thieves in Washington State won't leave with the goods anymore.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.