Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2017, 09:53 PM
 
2,684 posts, read 2,399,025 times
Reputation: 6284

Advertisements

It's just ridiculous that smoking is still legal. Ridiculous. There is absolutely no benefit to society by allowing idiots to increase the healthcare costs of those around them.

If we're going to keep smoking legal, all smokers should be placed in an entirely separate health insurance pool that only contains smokers. They can pay for each others' sins. No reason I should be footing the bill for their lung cancer. This doesn't even solve the problem of the damage they are doing to innocent bystanders via their secondhand smoke.

Just such a stupid, stupid habit. It wastes money for the user, costs more for society, yet big tobacco is still allowed to retain profits. Every dime of profit in cigarette sales should be plugged right back into our healthcare system. And this is coming from an otherwise devout conservative.

Ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2017, 09:57 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,694,537 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCresident2014 View Post
It's just ridiculous that smoking is still legal. Ridiculous. There is absolutely no benefit to society by allowing idiots to increase the healthcare costs of those around them.

If we're going to keep smoking legal, all smokers should be placed in an entirely separate health insurance pool that only contains smokers. They can pay for each others' sins. No reason I should be footing the bill for their lung cancer. This doesn't even solve the problem of the damage they are doing to innocent bystanders via their secondhand smoke.

Just such a stupid, stupid habit. It wastes money for the user, costs more for society, yet big tobacco is still allowed to retain profits. Every dime of profit in cigarette sales should be plugged right back into our healthcare system. And this is coming from an otherwise devout conservative.

Ridiculous.
No, what's amazing is the cig companies have not closed down due to all of the smoking related lawsuits. I have family member that died of lung cancer due to smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2017, 01:01 AM
 
Location: Queens, NY
4,525 posts, read 3,404,939 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCresident2014 View Post
It's just ridiculous that smoking is still legal. Ridiculous. There is absolutely no benefit to society by allowing idiots to increase the healthcare costs of those around them.

If we're going to keep smoking legal, all smokers should be placed in an entirely separate health insurance pool that only contains smokers. They can pay for each others' sins. No reason I should be footing the bill for their lung cancer. This doesn't even solve the problem of the damage they are doing to innocent bystanders via their secondhand smoke.

Just such a stupid, stupid habit. It wastes money for the user, costs more for society, yet big tobacco is still allowed to retain profits. Every dime of profit in cigarette sales should be plugged right back into our healthcare system. And this is coming from an otherwise devout conservative.

Ridiculous.
A person can still get lung cancer even if they've never smoked in their life.

I'm not a smoker, and never will be, and don't like it at all, but to make it illegal just sounds wrong to me.

I do agree on secondhand smoke, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2017, 07:00 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,586,929 times
Reputation: 15335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonesuch View Post
Gov't learned a lesson from alcohol and tobacco -- if you want to control something, catch it early.


By the time we were ready to "do something" about tobacco, +40% of adults were smokers.

On average, closer to 25% of American adults reported smoking between 1989 and 2007. Before that, Gallup surveys ranging back to World War II found the percentage who smoke in the 30% to 40% range. The highest smoking percentage as measured by Gallup was 45% in 1954.
Thats the thing, they could have made a FORTUNE if they stuck a sin tax on opoiods and just let the people buy them left and right, they obviously are aware of how much revenue comes in from sin taxes on cigs and booze, strange they just throw away such a huge potential $$ stream as opiates/ drugs in general, but I guess they bring in much more when it comes to the war on drugs, that takes lots of agencies, lots of employees, lots of budget money, etc.

Im also not sure I believe the current low numbers on how many people smoke, I deal with tobacco reps almost every day, and all these companies are doing absolutely fantastic, their profits go up every year, but at the same time, we are led to believe less and less people are smoking...? If that were true, it seems most of these tobacco companies would be just barely hanging on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2017, 08:34 PM
 
32,019 posts, read 36,773,537 times
Reputation: 13295
This is good news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2017, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,323,293 times
Reputation: 4660
Good. I hate smoking
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2017, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn New York
18,469 posts, read 31,627,689 times
Reputation: 28007
I dont smoke either, but say for argument sake the tax is so high everyone deceides to stop smoking.
the cig companies go out of business,
and the tax that each state collects goes away
what happens then? the governments say oh goodie, everyone stopped smoking and now were all going to be healthy,


lets tax milk now..........

trust men, they will find something else to tax

'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2017, 07:46 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,344 posts, read 51,925,382 times
Reputation: 23731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warszawa View Post
Good. I hate smoking
Soooo, personal hatred of something is reason to over-tax it? I hate drinking (alcohol), but don't believe it should be over-taxed or banned. Everyone has something they hate, but that's not justification for adding "sin taxes" and targeting one item/substance over others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2017, 07:49 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,344 posts, read 51,925,382 times
Reputation: 23731
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCresident2014 View Post
It's just ridiculous that smoking is still legal. Ridiculous. There is absolutely no benefit to society by allowing idiots to increase the healthcare costs of those around them.

If we're going to keep smoking legal, all smokers should be placed in an entirely separate health insurance pool that only contains smokers. They can pay for each others' sins. No reason I should be footing the bill for their lung cancer. This doesn't even solve the problem of the damage they are doing to innocent bystanders via their secondhand smoke.

Just such a stupid, stupid habit. It wastes money for the user, costs more for society, yet big tobacco is still allowed to retain profits. Every dime of profit in cigarette sales should be plugged right back into our healthcare system. And this is coming from an otherwise devout conservative.

Ridiculous.
Are you also okay with separate insurance pools for people who are overweight, have genetic tendencies towards certain diseases, drink more than average, drive too fast, etc? Sounds like a slippery slope.

As for why it's still legal, I think prohibition (of alcohol) proves why that's a bad idea... it only opens up the black market, and eliminates regulations on the product. You think smokers will stop just because it's banned? Not a chance. Also, people like you don't realize how much revenue the tobacco industry brings. It might be "dirty money," but you'd notice and probably whine if all those tax dollars suddenly vanished. Smokers are loved when their taxes are paying for stuff, but hated when you pass one in the street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2017, 11:37 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,856,075 times
Reputation: 8666
Banning only has a partial effect, and creates a criminal underworld -- see prohibition and a million illegal drugs today. But yes, tax the hell out of them.

And do it at the source -- raw tobacco, manufacturers, importers, whatever. That would deal with some of the loophole issue. Of course that would take national action and the North Carolinans wouldn't go for it (farm revenue is worth more than millions of human lives to some people).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top