Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Moat people, if they're on a road that it can be safely done and they're not in a hurry, will stop and move a hazard like a tire, especially in a residential area. Pull off, throw on the hazards, move the object.
If the street that was pictured is the one where it happened it doesn't look wide enough to go around something in the middle of it.
Ha! That video link led straight to a lava cake ad, thanks a lot! Anyways, there was plenty of room to drive around that tire even if it was in the middle of the road. If I was alone I would probably have stopped to move it. If I had my baby in the car? Nope, I would have drove around it.
There is a case in California,an exec who owned a drug company had a Burmese mistress and a boy from previous marriage.
The boy and the mistress do not get along and one day he was pushed down the stairs and died.
later they found the dead mistress hanged from the balcony with her hands and feet tied behind her.
I can't believe the wife would plan this with her 2 yo daughter in the car. She'd want it to happen when her kids were safe at home with her, whether he was forced to get out of the car or not.
A carjacking gone wrong would be my first thought, but it appears the police have ruled that out. But I'm not sure how they did that or why.
As for shooting someone in a moving vehicle that is not too difficult with an automatic or semiautomatic weapon, especially at close range from the side. The police and drive by shooters do it all the time. They just keep firing until they hit the driver.
A hitman wouldn’t take a chance of hitting the child especially if the client said make sure you don’t. I doubt carjacking because the person shot him execution style when he got out, didn’t rob him, nothing. I too find it suspicious it was right after he dropped ex’s kids off.
I can't believe the wife would plan this with her 2 yo daughter in the car. She'd want it to happen when her kids were safe at home with her, whether he was forced to get out of the car or not.
What I thought sure the 2 year old was him and his present wife's child. The Mother of the 2 year old is his wife not EX wife. The twins he dropped off were to his EX wife. He must have frequently had the 2 year old with him when he had visitation with the twins from his previous marriage.
I can read, thank you, and I was responding to the person (Post #12) who suggested the WIFE might be involved.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
