Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,375,961 times
Reputation: 1450

Advertisements

USA TODAY's article "Inmates stole $39 million from the IRS in 2009" serves to highlight that the wealthy are not the only ones trying to get extra money back, avoid taxes or pay less than their obligation under the current federal tax system. Income tax evasion and fraud cut across all income tax brackets (News, Cover story, Wednesday).

Simplifying federal tax code will reduce fraud - USATODAY.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2011, 01:58 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
3,493 posts, read 4,555,737 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderful Jellal View Post
USA TODAY's article "Inmates stole $39 million from the IRS in 2009" serves to highlight that the wealthy are not the only ones trying to get extra money back, avoid taxes or pay less than their obligation under the current federal tax system. Income tax evasion and fraud cut across all income tax brackets (News, Cover story, Wednesday).

Simplifying federal tax code will reduce fraud - USATODAY.com
To me getting rid of the present tax system and institute a Fair Tax system would be less wasteful. People would not have to do all this paperwork reporting taxes, no huge bureaucracy running the system, and not being able to cheat on taxes. You buy something you pay right on the money your taxes, take care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 02:39 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,202,785 times
Reputation: 4801
What would the tax rate be on this fair tax system?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:19 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
3,493 posts, read 4,555,737 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
What would the tax rate be on this fair tax system?
When I read the book "The Fair Tax" it does not set an exact number. That is a number that would have to be suggested. I read the book a little while ago and the best I remembers that he does suggest a rate range but I do not remember so I won't quote him, sorry. The book is very interesting. He also does ask for opinions on improving his suggested system. He does not claim it to be perfect so he ask readers to provide ideas to improve it, take care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:21 PM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,375,333 times
Reputation: 2651
Just tax all income over the poverty rate at the same rate, regardless of whether it was earned or a windfall like inheritance or interest. No deductions, no credits, no exemptions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:28 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
3,493 posts, read 4,555,737 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean98125 View Post
Just tax all income over the poverty rate at the same rate, regardless of whether it was earned or a windfall like inheritance or interest. No deductions, no credits, no exemptions.
In principle I agre with you as a compromise but you know what? The problem I see is that many people disagree what actually is a poor person. A while ago I started a thread asking people what is their criteria to be considered poor. I had veried answers. Many factors come into play. I am sure you are aware that many people that are in the poor bracket are so much better off that many other people because they get so much money through other sources and they do not report it. Many of these sources of income are cheating the government, thus the taxpayer, in their income report besides other means. That is why even though in the spirit of intent I am with you but I would not agree with such suggestion, take care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:45 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,202,785 times
Reputation: 4801
Kinda of a blunt tool though, someone living at national poverty rate in Mississippi might be living a bit larger than someone in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:53 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
3,493 posts, read 4,555,737 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
Kinda of a blunt tool though, someone living at national poverty rate in Mississippi might be living a bit larger than someone in California.
That is why national programs like National Health care can be good in some states and not so good in others and also be wasteful. That is why the state should handle their programs at their level. The tax the federal government should be to maintain it but without so much bureaucracy and to only take care of the duties delineated for them at federal level by the Constitution, take care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 04:38 PM
 
8,420 posts, read 7,422,672 times
Reputation: 8769
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
What would the tax rate be on this fair tax system?
The Fair Tax is a consumption tax on all goods and services purchased new within the United States, levied at the point of sale. This includes food and medicine, but not pre-owned mansions, second-hand mega yachts or used Bentleys.

To match the current revenues that are earned via the current tax system of progressive income taxes, regressive payroll taxes and inheritance taxes on estates of $5 million or more, the Fair Tax would have to be 40% or 45% exclusive, to start. (Please note that the current revenues are not enough to balance the budget). It is expected that the Fair Tax would need to be adjusted on a regular annual or semi-annual basis.

The poor (as defined by the current federal poverty level, roughly $12K for individuals to $40K for heads of large households), who spend all of their money on goods and services just to get by, get a tax pre-bate that reduces their Fair Tax hit to a minimum.

The high income earners, who tend to invest and save much more than they spend, would pay sales taxes only on the purchase of goods and services that they can't structure under a corporation (no corporate taxes, no taxes on corporate benefits) and on goods and services that they can't purchase and enjoy overseas. Depending on how much is saved/sheltered/offshored, the tax break can be enormous.

The working middle class (earning anywhere between $40K and 70K per year) will see their effective tax rate rise, and in some cases double.

If you think people earning a million dollars a year are paying far too much in taxes and if you think that those people earning less than the median wage should pay twice or three times as much in a national consumption tax that they currently pay in income and payroll taxes, then you'll like the Fair Tax.

But then again, the Fair Tax isn't about simplifying the tax code...that could be done with a simplified income tax. The Fair Tax is merely a smoke screen for repealing the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 06:59 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,550,601 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
The Fair Tax is a consumption tax on all goods and services purchased new within the United States, levied at the point of sale. This includes food and medicine, but not pre-owned mansions, second-hand mega yachts or used Bentleys.

To match the current revenues that are earned via the current tax system of progressive income taxes, regressive payroll taxes and inheritance taxes on estates of $5 million or more, the Fair Tax would have to be 40% or 45% exclusive, to start. (Please note that the current revenues are not enough to balance the budget). It is expected that the Fair Tax would need to be adjusted on a regular annual or semi-annual basis.

The poor (as defined by the current federal poverty level, roughly $12K for individuals to $40K for heads of large households), who spend all of their money on goods and services just to get by, get a tax pre-bate that reduces their Fair Tax hit to a minimum.

The high income earners, who tend to invest and save much more than they spend, would pay sales taxes only on the purchase of goods and services that they can't structure under a corporation (no corporate taxes, no taxes on corporate benefits) and on goods and services that they can't purchase and enjoy overseas. Depending on how much is saved/sheltered/offshored, the tax break can be enormous.

The working middle class (earning anywhere between $40K and 70K per year) will see their effective tax rate rise, and in some cases double.

If you think people earning a million dollars a year are paying far too much in taxes and if you think that those people earning less than the median wage should pay twice or three times as much in a national consumption tax that they currently pay in income and payroll taxes, then you'll like the Fair Tax.

But then again, the Fair Tax isn't about simplifying the tax code...that could be done with a simplified income tax. The Fair Tax is merely a smoke screen for repealing the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Very good analysis. Outstanding.

But Wait, there is more.

When I went digging further, they were including tuition and books to be taxed, as well as .gov sales/purchases -- meaning the tax itself would include the cost of the .gov it was supposed to be funding.

As you noted, business "expenses" would be exempt (a loop-hole so wide you could fly a corporate jet through it), and they do not mention that State and Local government sales taxes would still exist adding together to over a 50% tax on purchases.

Black/gray/and flea market sales would replace retail overnight.

Overall, the "Fair Tax" is a pack of lies and bait for chumps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top