Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2014, 01:04 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwhitegocubs View Post
Hahaha, a moderate market-based reform is a "Socialist monstrosity?" There wasn't even a public insurance option, much less a single-payer reform or a British NHS-style nationalization of our healthcare system. The most "Socialist" thing was an expansion of Medicaid, and numerous states have balked at THAT out of spite and/or parsimony.
The correct term is fascist..

does that make you fel better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2014, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,908,308 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Stopped here because thats a complete LIE

When ACA was passed there was about 30 million americans without insurance

Then this climbed to 46 million, and we are now hovering around 31 million americans without insurance.

Thats a LOSS of 11 million individuals.

And dont forget, that doesnt include illegals, which the administation tried to count in the initial numbers but was called on it for being the lie that it was.

Even the CBO has admitted that the numbers will not go lower than 30 million without insurance over the next decade, which makes it a complete failure since it was designed to cover EVERY AMERICAN.
In reality that is actually a net loss of 1 million. We lost 16 million due to plans that got dropped to get to the 46 million and gained 15 million to get to the hovering around 31 million. Unless you meant 20 and typed in 3 by accident, that's bad math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 01:59 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
In reality that is actually a net loss of 1 million. We lost 16 million due to plans that got dropped to get to the 46 million and gained 15 million to get to the hovering around 31 million. Unless you meant 20 and typed in 3 by accident, that's bad math.
actually I meant we're hovering around 41 million uninsured at the moment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/us...hows.html?_r=0

11 million individuals have lost health insurance since ACA has been passed into law, and the employer mandate hasnt even kicked in yet. We went from 30 million without insurance to 46 million, and then back down to 41 million. The CBO says we'll never get below 30 million post ACA..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 04:46 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,581 posts, read 17,304,861 times
Reputation: 37349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
...... We know that about 8 mio people signed up for ObamaCare and about 4 million more people now have health care coverage than before..........
Could be true.

They signed up.

But they didn't pay for it. They discovered that - for them - it was "free". The rest of America pays for their healthcare.

In some cases, that's a good thing. People who have been unfortunate deserve support here in America.

But is some cases people are sabotaging their own chance for success so that they always qualify for "free" insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 06:47 PM
 
25 posts, read 36,192 times
Reputation: 20
Has anyone seen the Jimmy Kimmel man on the street thing he did about Obamacare vs. The affordable care act? If not its on youtube.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Apple Valley Calif
7,474 posts, read 22,887,160 times
Reputation: 5684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
This Marc Thiesen calls himself an "economist"?!? This really explains why so many people distrust economists. He sure gives his profession a really bad rap. We know that about 8 mio people signed up for ObamaCare and about 4 million more people now have health care coverage than before. Not ideal, but a lot better than before. Let's go into details of what he said and "predicted":

- "Even if the administration manages to fix the Web site and finally implement the individual mandate, people still may not join — because the plans being offered are so unattractive."

- "Even with federal subsidies, few Americans will bother to buy insurance with a $4,000 to $12,700 deductible — and millions won’t even be eligible for the subsidies."

- "If enough Americans don’t join the exchanges, Obamacare collapses."

- "London’s Daily Mail reported that total sign-ups in the first week were just 51,000 people."

One more pseudo-"economist" we can scratch from our list to trust in anything.


Marc Thiessen: The Obamacare implosion is worse than you think - The Washington Post
Posts like this are the reason there are still democrats around, you post false information and some people believe you. There are far less people now insured than before and obamacare is still a failure and is not working..!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 08:11 PM
 
3,786 posts, read 5,334,176 times
Reputation: 6314
January 2015. That's when the train wreck really starts to kick in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Prosper
6,255 posts, read 17,106,413 times
Reputation: 9502
Sigh.

Obamacare has become such a hot button issue. Too bad 99% of the people arguing for or against don't know jack about it or have any meaningful (factual) statistics to back up their views.

I used to be an actuary for a large medical insurance firm. I have my Masters in Econ. I know a bit about the inner workings of insurance firms... and how they were scared to death about Obamacare being passed.

I want any detractors of Obamacare to consider my last sentence, which is undoubtedly fact. WHY do you think insurance firms were all deadset against Obamacare, hmm?

The answer is because they've lost their ability to keep raising their premiums by insane amounts every year. With Obamacare, it's kept insurance providers in check, because if they raise rates too much, they'll lose their customers to a plan on one of the exchanges. It's that simple.

People are complaining that their premiums went up under Obamacare... Yes, they probably did. Don't forget to think about the fact that your premiums were going to go up ANYWAY, and probably by an even larger degree, before the implementation of Obamacare.

I worked for that insurance firm for about 6 years... long enough to develop an incredible distaste and loathing for insurance firms in their pursuit of profit at the expense of human life. Healthcare is one of those things that should NOT be a private sector enterprise. It isn't like buying a car, where we have choices as to what kind of car we want, and what features we want it to have, etc. Healthcare, at it's simplest, is the same for everyone. We ALL want access to it, because when we need it, that's it. We need it. It's not an economic "want", it's an economic need. As such, profit needs to take a backseat to humanity. People shouldn't lose their coverage or be denied coverage because of a preexisting condition. I've seen that a lot btw... People who paid their premiums religiously, but their insurer dropped them the second they find out that a person has come down with a terminal illness that will be expensive to treat.

With Obamacare, those people now have coverage, which the "free" market denied them before.

The saddest thing about this topic is how many people have had the wool pulled over their eyes. Healthcare is not about what political affiliation you are, though some can only think in those terms. In the end, it boils down to what you value more... Do you think the corporation should trump the individual in matters of their own health? Or do you think that we should all have a fair shake at living the healthiest life we can?

And just to make one last point... for the love of God, if you're going to make a point, back it up with FACTS from a REPUTABLE source. Not a biased one. Some of the claims in here are utterly ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 08:58 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MckinneyOwnr View Post
Sigh.

Obamacare has become such a hot button issue. Too bad 99% of the people arguing for or against don't know jack about it or have any meaningful (factual) statistics to back up their views.

I used to be an actuary for a large medical insurance firm. I have my Masters in Econ. I know a bit about the inner workings of insurance firms... and how they were scared to death about Obamacare being passed.
They werent scared, they helped write the thing..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2014, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Prosper
6,255 posts, read 17,106,413 times
Reputation: 9502
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
They werent scared, they helped write the thing..
55,000 posts, and a paltry 7,000 reputation score. You want to take a guess why that is or should I just tell you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top