Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2016, 11:34 PM
 
146 posts, read 121,127 times
Reputation: 74

Advertisements

some people say companies are bringing their manufacturing to other poor countries to exploit the poor people. and other reasons, but what do you think about that ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2016, 11:41 PM
 
3 posts, read 2,184 times
Reputation: 11
It is a great way to work for humanity as well as to expand business worldwide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 01:12 AM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,772,911 times
Reputation: 22087
How about all the foreign companies that are moving their jobs and money to this country. Something everyone knows is that there are 13 auto companies with big factories in the United States. Only 2 of those 13 are American owned companies. More foreign owned companies building cars in the U.S. produce a lot more cars than the U.S. owned companies. And this just in one industry.

Jobs have been coming back to the U.S. for years.

Foreign manufacturers bringing jobs to U.S.

Record number of manufacturing jobs returning to America - MarketWatch

As Overseas Costs Rise, More U.S. Companies Are 'Reshoring' : Parallels : NPR

Actually American owned companies, do not use as many people to build cars as the foreign owned companies employ.

Made in America: Which U.S.-Made Car Creates the Most Jobs? - ABC News

And for years the non union foreign owned auto companies have actually paid higher wages than the unionized American auto owned auto companies.

UAW Losing Pay Edge: Foreign Automakers' Bonuses Boost Wages in U.S. Plants as Detroit Car Companies Struggle - aftermarketNews
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,582,293 times
Reputation: 22639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkplugnw View Post
to exploit the poor people.
Xiao Wang is 30 years old and lives in a small village in China along with wife, four parents, and his kid. Their household income is about $4k/year from a combination of the small plot farming soy and occasional odd job that pops up hauling bricks etc.

Xiao Wang discovers he can move to Shenzhen and work on a manufacturing line for $6k/year, sending most of it home to help his family. The income the remaining family members generate back at the village won't be impacted much since there isn't that much work so can be handled by wife/parents/kid.

After a year Xiao Wang's family has a new scooter, their home has new windows, the daughter has school supplies, and the parents are enjoying being able to afford more meat in the diet when they cook the family meals.

How is Wang being exploited? He doubled his family income and raised their standard of living by voluntarily taking advantage of the opportunity to work for a much higher wage. He's learning new skills, and while it is hard being away from his family and working long hours he believe it is worth what his family gains, in fact his biggest fear is probably rumors of manufacturing moving to somewhere cheaper like Indonesia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Ohio
1,884 posts, read 1,004,329 times
Reputation: 2871
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
Xiao Wang is 30 years old and lives in a small village in China along with wife, four parents, and his kid. Their household income is about $4k/year from a combination of the small plot farming soy and occasional odd job that pops up hauling bricks etc.

Xiao Wang discovers he can move to Shenzhen and work on a manufacturing line for $6k/year, sending most of it home to help his family. The income the remaining family members generate back at the village won't be impacted much since there isn't that much work so can be handled by wife/parents/kid.

After a year Xiao Wang's family has a new scooter, their home has new windows, the daughter has school supplies, and the parents are enjoying being able to afford more meat in the diet when they cook the family meals.

How is Wang being exploited? He doubled his family income and raised their standard of living by voluntarily taking advantage of the opportunity to work for a much higher wage. He's learning new skills, and while it is hard being away from his family and working long hours he believe it is worth what his family gains, in fact his biggest fear is probably rumors of manufacturing moving to somewhere cheaper like Indonesia.

Great post. Rarely do people realize this perspective. Exploit is the wrong term, more like capitalize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2016, 11:13 PM
 
Location: Haiku
7,132 posts, read 4,772,153 times
Reputation: 10327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkplugnw View Post
some people say companies are bringing their manufacturing to other poor countries to exploit the poor people. and other reasons, but what do you think about that ?
Many products can be produced cheaper in other countries than in the US. That means it costs me, the buyer of those products, less. So why wouldn't I be in favor of that?

Blame the unions. They demanded so much they priced themselves out of the market. And I am not sure it is a matter of "exploiting poor people". The fact is, the US was engaged in exploitation through its policy of protectionism. Only by letting US work be exported to other countries have foreign workers started earning decent wages and enjoy a decent standard of living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 02:43 AM
 
4,369 posts, read 3,726,103 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoByFour View Post
Many products can be produced cheaper in other countries than in the US. That means it costs me, the buyer of those products, less. So why wouldn't I be in favor of that?

Blame the unions. They demanded so much they priced themselves out of the market. And I am not sure it is a matter of "exploiting poor people". The fact is, the US was engaged in exploitation through its policy of protectionism. Only by letting US work be exported to other countries have foreign workers started earning decent wages and enjoy a decent standard of living.
Because Xiao Wang is using tooling that dates back to Eisenhower's presidency and poor quality parts leading to crappier products.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Western NY
732 posts, read 969,772 times
Reputation: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
Xiao Wang is 30 years old and lives in a small village in China along with wife, four parents, and his kid. Their household income is about $4k/year from a combination of the small plot farming soy and occasional odd job that pops up hauling bricks etc.

Xiao Wang discovers he can move to Shenzhen and work on a manufacturing line for $6k/year, sending most of it home to help his family. The income the remaining family members generate back at the village won't be impacted much since there isn't that much work so can be handled by wife/parents/kid.

After a year Xiao Wang's family has a new scooter, their home has new windows, the daughter has school supplies, and the parents are enjoying being able to afford more meat in the diet when they cook the family meals.

How is Wang being exploited? He doubled his family income and raised their standard of living by voluntarily taking advantage of the opportunity to work for a much higher wage. He's learning new skills, and while it is hard being away from his family and working long hours he believe it is worth what his family gains, in fact his biggest fear is probably rumors of manufacturing moving to somewhere cheaper like Indonesia.
Let us get for real with your story.


Situation A Xiao at is $4K a year job: He would have lived to 75, raised his family till they took care of themselves and actually took care of him for his last 15 years so he could focus on family and retirement.


Instead
Situation B Xiao at is $6K a year Shenzhen job: After ten years of breathing in arsenic, drinking lead and toxic chemicals dumped into the river of his factory Xiao dies at 35 from a rapidly spreading cancer that kills him before he can make it back to his hometown. His children are young and don't remember who he is, they are doomed to a life of poverty and crime because their parent is deceased. They sell the scooter for pennies on the dollar to buy food, and once the money runs out they live as beggars. His former wife moves on to a new husband who lives in the community and does all she can to forget him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 12:49 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,116,034 times
Reputation: 18603
Some people on this forum need to actually learn something about China. The state of the art manufacturing in China would be a major wake up call. Rapid industrialization has given China some serious pollution problems. The clean up is a high priority. BTW, the same has hit every industrial nation especially at the start of industrialization. For over a century London was covered in soot and smog from burning coal. The US has plenty of superfund sites still leftover and in need of clean up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2016, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,835 posts, read 24,922,073 times
Reputation: 28535
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoByFour View Post
Many products can be produced cheaper in other countries than in the US. That means it costs me, the buyer of those products, less. So why wouldn't I be in favor of that?

Blame the unions. They demanded so much they priced themselves out of the market. And I am not sure it is a matter of "exploiting poor people". The fact is, the US was engaged in exploitation through its policy of protectionism. Only by letting US work be exported to other countries have foreign workers started earning decent wages and enjoy a decent standard of living.
If you blame the unions for trying to give raises to their workforce (who pay union dues), than you must also blame the US corp for trying to give their shareholders bigger profits (by moving production overseas).

Unions and corporations have their own self interests. It is their job and purpose to serve those self interests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top