Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2016, 01:12 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,477,048 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrarunner View Post
It would be interesting to find out... some areas definitely have more renters than others.

I've also been surprised at the number of single family homes that had been rentals being sold to owner occupants... I guess the single family rental business is not lucrative enough?



This is one of my biggest gripes with "split roll" property taxes. (Where rental property is taxed at a higher rate than owner-occupied homes.)

Whenever a SFR comes on market, owner-occupants have an inherent bidding advantage over landlords because the property tax differential affords them a lower monthly payment (carrying cost) than an investor.

And, yes, SFR rentals are less profitable, which should be no surprise given the dramatically lower median income of renters - half that of homeowners.

Outside the luxury rental niche, the highest SFR rent rolls probably come from student or group rentals where several unrelated adults share housing in pricey micromarkets. But that probably entails greater local regulation and unrelated occupancy restrictions, which impair profitability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2016, 02:37 AM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,924,520 times
Reputation: 8743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perma Bear View Post
That's pretty filthy to me. That's a lower-upper class lifestyle without lifting a finger.
You have to lift a lot of fingers to get and save $6 million; then you can relax and take it fairly easy, on $240,000 a year (before tax, at a 4% withdrawal rate). Upper middle class is more like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 03:00 AM
 
106,729 posts, read 108,937,910 times
Reputation: 80213
the problem is you have two schools of thought going on in this thread and it is creating the great debate over what 1 million dollars represents .

to those who think in terms of hitting the lottery and having 1 million dollars EXTRA to blow and deplete on things it is a lot of money even today .

but for anyone to do that they already need their retirement well funded and taken care of so they have a million they can just spend .

those who don't have that pre funded retirement and got 1 million have nothing more then the lifestyle a 40k nyc sanitation worker pension gets you who has little savings . .

here in nyc it ain't much and certainly falls short of even a middle class life style .

the reality is if you need to support yourself it ain't about the pile of money , it is only about how much that pile of money can generate and how long it can support you and your spouse .

remember just drawing 4% inflation adjusted is based on the possibilty that all the money can be gone by the 30th year , principal too .

if all we had is 1 million , living here in queens i can tell you there is no way i would have retired at 62 voluntarily . it would fall way short for even a modest middle class lifestyle here . not only would most of our wants have to be eliminated but we would stress over every unexpected bill.

like we just saw medicare jump 300% and go from 104.50 to 390.00 a month for just my wife . a property sale in 2014 before we were retired or she was even on medicare triggered it . there is still a 2900.00 dollar a year supplement bill and a 300 a year drug plan bill to go with that and that is without my costs for medical since i am to young for medicare

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-27-2016 at 03:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 06:01 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,286,736 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
the problem is you have two schools of thought going on in this thread and it is creating the great debate over what 1 million dollars represents .

to those who think in terms of hitting the lottery and having 1 million dollars EXTRA to blow and deplete on things it is a lot of money even today .

but for anyone to do that they already need their retirement well funded and taken care of so they have a million they can just spend .
For those of us without a defined benefit pension, $1 million in investable assets is equivalent to having a public sector job with a $40k pension when you retire in your early 60's. You combine that with a Social Security check and you have a comfortable middle class retirement but nothing like what is projected in a golf tournament financial services money management advertisement or an erectile dysfunction commercial. You're not going to be doing elaborate trips around the world. You're not doing 3-star dining every week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 06:42 AM
 
Location: The Northeast - hoping one day the Northwest!
1,107 posts, read 1,453,299 times
Reputation: 1012
The sad thing is a lot of our society is just too judgmental these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 06:42 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,477,048 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
For those of us without a defined benefit pension, $1 million in investable assets is equivalent to having a public sector job with a $40k pension when you retire in your early 60's. You combine that with a Social Security check and you have a comfortable middle class retirement but nothing like what is projected in a golf tournament financial services money management advertisement or an erectile dysfunction commercial. You're not going to be doing elaborate trips around the world. You're not doing 3-star dining every week.

Golf attracts a ridiculously affluent audience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 06:58 AM
 
106,729 posts, read 108,937,910 times
Reputation: 80213
it must be because of the dopey outfits you get to wear .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 06:59 AM
 
106,729 posts, read 108,937,910 times
Reputation: 80213
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
For those of us without a defined benefit pension, $1 million in investable assets is equivalent to having a public sector job with a $40k pension when you retire in your early 60's. You combine that with a Social Security check and you have a comfortable middle class retirement but nothing like what is projected in a golf tournament financial services money management advertisement or an erectile dysfunction commercial. You're not going to be doing elaborate trips around the world. You're not doing 3-star dining every week.
exactly , folks have to differentiate between having 1 million to just spend vs 1 million to support yourself . supporting yourself for decades on it isn't much in the scheme of things .

most folks will earn a million dollars working their careers but it is used to support themselves . it is as consumed as that million generating your income in retirement could be .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Dothan AL
1,450 posts, read 1,210,561 times
Reputation: 1011
Upper class is more a social position. In economic terms, a person worth 3 million liquid, and their home paid for, would qualify
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 07:14 AM
 
106,729 posts, read 108,937,910 times
Reputation: 80213
here in nyc a 120k -160k pretax income from 3 million dollars still only buys a middle class lifestyle with quite a bit of budget watching . we are in that income range now in retirement and we don't live in manhattan but the boroughs . it buys us a decent middle class life style although we don't have a paid off home . . .

1/3 of the budget goes for health insurance , long term care insurance and rent . that is before we figure in taxes .

we would likely need half that in the lower cost areas but we like it here and to us worth the costs .

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-27-2016 at 08:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top