Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2016, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Eastern Tennessee
4,384 posts, read 4,381,108 times
Reputation: 12679

Advertisements

No one that I know has any way to go back in time and magically be 18 owning a house in 1957. So..........useless question
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,407 posts, read 4,627,644 times
Reputation: 3919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perma Bear View Post
You have 100 dollars in the bank now, no college degree, and make 10 dollars an hour in Sunnyvale.
Which would you chose? What would you do in said positions?
$74k and 18 own a home in 1957, but not in Belmont or some overpriced area. I'm a millennial and think my generation is a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,407 posts, read 4,627,644 times
Reputation: 3919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
Life has never been easier than today. I would choose today over 2000, 2000 over 1990, 1990 over 1980, 1980 over 1970, 1970 over 1960, 1960 over 1950, 1950 over 1940...
Disagree, I'd choose the 1990s > 2010s, 2000s > 2010s and 1980s > 1990s. This decade has been the worst compared to the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Purgatory
6,382 posts, read 6,270,742 times
Reputation: 9916
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
If I worked in a sandwich shop right now, it wouldn't be too long before I had $74,000 and owned a house. Not in Belmont, because I don't want to live in Belmont, but I'd have a house and maybe a couple more of them for rentals.

..... .
Wow. Impressive. I'm assuming you live with your parents or otherwise have a very low COL in a very low COL area.

Where I live, even just renting a studio, with no cable no car and a flip phone, it would take many years, if not decades, to save 74k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:23 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,917,771 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
The big problem with 1957 is...no internet!
We had it's precursor. Party line phones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 02:16 PM
 
729 posts, read 429,189 times
Reputation: 740
Now, tbh. Not much social progress had been made back then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 03:14 PM
 
Location: MA/ME (the way life should not be / the way it should be)
1,266 posts, read 1,387,424 times
Reputation: 735
1957, if i dont know about the internet its not an issue, if i remember it i will invent it and make trillions, i would "invent" windows, the internet, mac, ect..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 03:20 PM
 
13,721 posts, read 19,249,721 times
Reputation: 16971
How would an 18 year old have $74,000 and own a house, even in 1957? I was born in 1957 and my parents were well over 18 and they didn't own a house or have $74,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 05:30 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,898,097 times
Reputation: 9251
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpm1 View Post
But wealth is not going to get you to the standard of living enjoyed today. A sandwich shop worker has a higher standard of living than a rich person in 57. AC, color TV, etc etc.
Technology was primitive, yes. Phones had rotary dials and it the Princess phone was a major advance. It was lighted! But in other ways workers in the 50s had it better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 06:53 PM
 
509 posts, read 554,249 times
Reputation: 1729
Wasn't aware sandwich shop worker was so lucrative
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top