Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2016, 02:23 PM
 
524 posts, read 574,592 times
Reputation: 1093

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
I get that people sell houses, but this doesn't explain it, because the money they get should be enough to buy the next house, unless the latter is more expensive. I get that people move up in house, but you can then ask the same question about the next house, and houses cannot just keep getting bigger without bound, right?

It seems to me that EITHER 1) this points to a much more serious wealth gap than we thought, OR we should expect that by (for instance) 2050 we should see outright owners become more common.
People move on average every 7 years. Figure that the home "owner" never owned the home that is being sold, but were 7 years into a 30 year mortgage. The payments at the beginning of a mortgage are mostly interest with very little going to paying down the mortgage. So at sale the "owner" will get their down payment, principle paid, and appreciation. However moving is expensive. And I believe most of the profit to roll into the next house is eaten up by realtor fees, moving expenses, and closing fees on the next place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2016, 04:09 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,917,875 times
Reputation: 8743
About 1/3 of the houses in the U.S. are paid for and have no mortgage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 04:22 PM
 
47 posts, read 35,422 times
Reputation: 56
Heck be nice if they will build a home for everybody family their is, but we all know that wont happen. I see so many homes that are boarded up, broken down due to neglect.. Why not just let a person come in and fix it and live in it rent/mortgage free. After all the county/state not making any money on it when its just sitting their. We have a housing problem, and no family should be renting from the MAN because of the RED tape and other obstruction to prevent a person getting a home.

What does having 6 years of taxes, 2 years of paystubs have to do with buying a home, and have a decent rate of 500 a month.. Honestly, if i had a house payment for 500 a month, i would not leave for nothing, and will it to the kids..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 06:21 PM
 
Location: SF Bay & Diamond Head
1,776 posts, read 1,872,259 times
Reputation: 1981
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
it's beside the point in many (most?) cases where the option doesn't exist to own a home outright because the net worth isn't high enough.
What does your net worth have to do with owning a home outright? Your posts make no sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 06:34 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,584,312 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by honobob View Post
What does your net worth have to do with owning a home outright? Your posts make no sense.
If someone has a net worth of $200, they aren't going to be in a position to own a home outright (except perhaps in Detroit? or with massive student loans from med school?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: SF Bay & Diamond Head
1,776 posts, read 1,872,259 times
Reputation: 1981
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
If someone has a net worth of $200, they aren't going to be in a position to own a home outright (except perhaps in Detroit? or with massive student loans from med school?)
Um, they can pay it off in 360 monthly payments with a net worth of $200. Your posts don't make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 07:18 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,584,312 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by honobob View Post
Um, they can pay it off in 360 monthly payments with a net worth of $200. Your posts don't make sense.
And then their net worth would not be $200. Whose posts don't make sense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 07:22 PM
 
Location: SF Bay & Diamond Head
1,776 posts, read 1,872,259 times
Reputation: 1981
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
And then their net worth would not be $200. Whose posts don't make sense?
Oh! Oh! I know! Yours. Are you really in an Economics thread trying to school someone when you don't have a clue about net worth? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 07:26 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,584,312 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by honobob View Post
Oh! Oh! I know! Yours. Are you really in an Economics thread trying to school someone when you don't have a clue about net worth? Really?
Oh, so the house was destroyed by a tornado, without insurance, and is now worth $200? Is that the assumption?

The person with a $200 net worth at any single point in time does not have the option of owning outright at the time their net worth is $200, under normal circumstances. Decades later their net worth may have changed, but in the short run there is no way to go from the $200 net worth to owning a home outright in a short amount of time, absent winning the lottery, an inheritance, insurance settlement, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 07:37 PM
 
Location: SF Bay & Diamond Head
1,776 posts, read 1,872,259 times
Reputation: 1981
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Oh, so the house was destroyed by a tornado, without insurance, and is now worth $200? Is that the assumption?

The person with a $200 net worth at any single point in time does not have the option of owning outright at the time their net worth is $200, under normal circumstances. Decades later their net worth may have changed, but in the short run there is no way to go from the $200 net worth to owning a home outright in a short amount of time, absent winning the lottery, an inheritance, insurance settlement, etc.
Think about it. Ask your mon or dad for help. It is a pretty easy answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top