Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-21-2018, 10:54 AM
 
10,785 posts, read 5,702,611 times
Reputation: 10931

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
This thread has ended up a classic example of reductio ad absurdum focusing on people who earn $7.25 an hour and ignoring the subject of the thread - that you need to make 2.5 times minimum wage to rent an apartment; in most parts of the US that is $18-25 an hour. That's as much as an experienced bookkeeper, a dental assistant or a roofer are paid. And yes of course they can rent a room, unless they happen to be married and have children, and if they do they need gma to live close by or be able to cough up $1,000-$1,500 a month for childcare.

And of course they should have been brilliant like all the CD posters and not have had children until they made their first million but once you have a kid, it's real hard to undo, it's not like returning a sweater that you decided you can't afford.

I would love to have a rational discussion about what happens to the people I described here...what's the solution? Clearly they can't all move to rural Missouri so that they can rent an apartment for $600 there are few jobs there anyway. Should the government subsidize housing for working families? Should builders be required to provide a number of units set aside for lower income working families? Should HUD provide vouchers for other than the very poor?

Or we can keep sharing rags to riches stories and wagging our collective finger at people who work for minimum wage /sigh
The solution is very simple - multiple roommates. It’s ridiculous to expect that someone should be able to live on their own while earning minimum wage.

 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:03 AM
 
2,360 posts, read 1,918,515 times
Reputation: 2118
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
The solution is very simple - multiple roommates. It’s ridiculous to expect that someone should be able to live on their own while earning minimum wage.
why is it ridiculous? we all should beable to afford to live on our own without living under a bridge or having muliti people in one house. Were not pack rats or roaches.
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,556 posts, read 34,927,283 times
Reputation: 73854
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitpausebutton2 View Post
why is it ridiculous? we all should beable to afford to live on our own without living under a bridge or having muliti people in one house. Were not pack rats or roaches.
It's never been that way before (at least not when I was young), why do you think you should be different?
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,864 posts, read 26,338,151 times
Reputation: 34068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burkmere View Post
Minimum wage jobs are made for folks who want a part-time job or students. If one can't upgrade from that, well, it is what it is. and you don't have to make 45-50k to rent something. Ridiculous drivel.

If you can't upgrade from a minimum wage part time job, then too bad. You are a result of your life choices.
What did I say that elicited that response from you? My point is that the article was NOT about people earning minimum wage, but rather people who earn twice or two and one half times the minimum wage and after I post that you jump in and lecture me about minimum wage jobs
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:08 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,441,082 times
Reputation: 13447
Why the hell would I care if someone else got an inheritance?

What does that have to do with me getting a job that provides value?
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,864 posts, read 26,338,151 times
Reputation: 34068
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
The solution is very simple - multiple roommates. It’s ridiculous to expect that someone should be able to live on their own while earning minimum wage.
My post was about people earning twice or 2.5 times the minimum wage and this is the second response I've gotten that completely ignores that and instead is educating me about what someone earning the minimum wage should be entitled to?
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,356 posts, read 8,588,422 times
Reputation: 16698
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitpausebutton2 View Post
why is it ridiculous? we all should beable to afford to live on our own without living under a bridge or having muliti people in one house. Were not pack rats or roaches.
People have a choice. There are lots of people making more money than you that need roommates. It just depends on where they live.
Minimum wage equals minimum lifestyle. You can live on minimum wage and not be under a bridge and still be comfortable.
You are asking for a middle class lifestyle that is the result of a higher income to be given to someone who is being paid minimum wages.
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,556 posts, read 34,927,283 times
Reputation: 73854
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
My post was about people earning twice or 2.5 times the minimum wage and this is the second response I've gotten that completely ignores that and instead is educating me about what someone earning the minimum wage should be entitled to?

You would be entitled to anything you can buy for that wage.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,356 posts, read 8,588,422 times
Reputation: 16698
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
This thread has ended up a classic example of reductio ad absurdum focusing on people who earn $7.25 an hour and ignoring the subject of the thread - that you need to make 2.5 times minimum wage to rent an apartment; in most parts of the US that is $18-25 an hour. That's as much as an experienced bookkeeper, a dental assistant or a roofer are paid. And yes of course they can rent a room, unless they happen to be married and have children, and if they do they need gma to live close by or be able to cough up $1,000-$1,500 a month for childcare.

And of course they should have been brilliant like all the CD posters and not have had children until they made their first million but once you have a kid, it's real hard to undo, it's not like returning a sweater that you decided you can't afford.

I would love to have a rational discussion about what happens to the people I described here...what's the solution? Clearly they can't all move to rural Missouri so that they can rent an apartment for $600 there are few jobs there anyway. Should the government subsidize housing for working families? Should builders be required to provide a number of units set aside for lower income working families? Should HUD provide vouchers for other than the very poor?

Or we can keep sharing rags to riches stories and wagging our collective finger at people who work for minimum wage /sigh
Well since we are all so dense and you see the issue more clearly, what is the solution. Most of us have said accept a lower standard of living that is still quite livable or improve yourself to earn more. That's our opinion and we're sticking to it, so it's up to you to come up with a solution that appeals to you more.

In Seattle they raised minimum wage quite a bit. Instead of enabling workers to get off government assistance and improve their lives, employers found that the workers instead wanted their hours cut because now they made too much money and were losing the freebies. That didn't work out so well.
 
Old 06-21-2018, 11:28 AM
 
2,360 posts, read 1,918,515 times
Reputation: 2118
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
People have a choice. There are lots of people making more money than you that need roommates. It just depends on where they live.
Minimum wage equals minimum lifestyle. You can live on minimum wage and not be under a bridge and still be comfortable.
You are asking for a middle class lifestyle that is the result of a higher income to be given to someone who is being paid minimum wages.

Yea their is alot of people making more then me and STILL have to live with roommates. Know why, COL/Greedy LL/ Low pay in high COL.. pick your poison. Should be here is 40 hours, and here is a house without a leaky roof. But we know houses aint cheap because of local laws, labor, and profit to be had with the banks. But a simple 500sq one bed room home can be built and can be something for a single min wage person that doesnt cost them 100k.. why are we not building them?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top