Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2021, 10:38 AM
 
Location: North Texas
3,502 posts, read 2,664,329 times
Reputation: 11029

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57 View Post
You missed the point, which was the ability to provide for the children in the first place. A form of prosperity. Today, providing for even one child is an considerable burden. Let alone 5-10.

They had to expand to find new farmland. We have to educate our children for 22 years at extraordinary cost just to give them a shot at the middle class.
I did not miss the point since having lived in an agrarian-type society. The reason for the large family was for labor. Also, two of the ten would not survive into adulthood. Your livelihood was dependent on weather and or crop failure. Why do you think half of the Irish population moved to America. Further, the farmers were never considered middle class but the working poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2021, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,069 posts, read 7,241,915 times
Reputation: 17146
Quote:
Originally Posted by txfriend View Post
I did not miss the point since having lived in an agrarian-type society. The reason for the large family was for labor. Also, two of the ten would not survive into adulthood. Your livelihood was dependent on weather and or crop failure. Why do you think half of the Irish population moved to America. Further, the farmers were never considered middle class but the working poor.
You're still missing it. Today a family would break if it even tried to have that many children. Life today doesn't accomodate them. Society today is oriented around having 1-3, maybe 4 at most. Our median incomes won't afford more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2021, 12:19 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,603,191 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunbiz1 View Post
That's b/c we're the only country on the planet that consumes without an equal amount of production.
We accomplish this by simply printing 1 trillion in currency annually, an approach which is unsustainable.
Anyone stating differently, is in denial of what is to come.
The playing field will eventually be leveled, lowering the U.S. standard of living.
It kind of sounds like you're saying we're the only country on the planet with a trade deficit, which is factually incorrect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top