Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2008, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles Area
3,306 posts, read 4,154,654 times
Reputation: 592

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
= I don't think people are going to stop renting apartments, shopping centers, public storage units any time soon.
You joking? Shopping centers are becoming more and more vacant across the country. There are far too many public storage units. Even vacancy rates on apartments are going up due to households merging.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2008, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Keller, TX
5,658 posts, read 6,275,152 times
Reputation: 4111
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
Unlike Citibank, REITS are obligated by law to pay out dividends. Individual REITS may go out of business, but the REIT index should not.
RQI continues to be the biggest loser (not literally) I've seen in some time. I've had it in my watch list after Mr. Ben Stein stated it was a large part of his strategy. At one point today it hit $1.80, which would give you an apparent 100% one year annualized dividend yield without reinvestment (if it were able to be maintained which I doubt it can be). But it looks like the thing is going to continue to penny stock status.

Anyway, what really is the story on this one? Is it a pass-through like SPG or a mutual fund?

Buying opportunity of the century?

Or will they have to drastically lower like DCS recently did?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 05:48 PM
 
707 posts, read 1,293,221 times
Reputation: 438
As vacancies start to hit the commercial properties they are going to have a hard time servicing their debt. I view this as negative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2008, 06:02 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,951,486 times
Reputation: 6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer2021 View Post
That is because you bought at the top.
...
Thanks! Is there any investment held this year that was not bought higher?

Reits have been in decline since a peak early in '07 (where I sold most of my holdings) but really dropped off a cliff in Q3 this year dropping steadily through this morning.

Until this recession eases I don't see commercial real estate in the cash so reits may not be a great bet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top