Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2009, 08:01 PM
 
2,638 posts, read 6,023,086 times
Reputation: 2378

Advertisements

It's the same thing I said before. I only provided an analogy to illustrate the fact that if I'm owed money, I don't make profit until that money has been paid back in full PLUS any interest I demanded as part of that debt. That's essentially what some here are saying - to call it "profit" is a misnomer while we're still owed money from the bailout package. The reason is simple: there's no guarantee will get all of that money back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2009, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Sverige och USA
702 posts, read 3,011,430 times
Reputation: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
When the entire original $700 billion is repaid, (which will never happen) perhaps we can begin to assess if we made a profit or not. Until then we are in the hole. To say it was a money maker is ludicrous propaganda.
So, with your logic, no one should be crying about huge losses either until we know how much is paid and how much the government would get from selling their stakes in various entities. To say it is a money loser is also ludicrous propoganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 04:13 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,292,547 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
So, with your logic, no one should be crying about huge losses either until we know how much is paid and how much the government would get from selling their stakes in various entities. To say it is a money loser is also ludicrous propoganda.
You think it is realistic to assume you will get the money back that was given to Fredie and Fannie, GM, Wachovia, and the other bankrupt entities? I think the assumption that it is a money looser is a pretty easy call.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2009, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,095,341 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
You think it is realistic to assume you will get the money back that was given to Fredie and Fannie, GM, Wachovia, and the other bankrupt entities? I think the assumption that it is a money looser is a pretty easy call.
You're not getting the point...you chicken littles talk about the "bailouts" as if the loses have already been realized but then complain up a storm when someone posts about the government making profit on one of the deals because the total loses have yet to be realized
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 05:15 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,921,177 times
Reputation: 4459
here is a list to put the "payback" in perspective:
Treasury's bank bailout list - CNNMoney.com

those are the banks who got the money and the highlighted are the banks who paid back the money. i don't think there is any room for celebration based on this list, do you?

Last edited by floridasandy; 09-04-2009 at 05:26 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:25 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,292,547 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
You're not getting the point...you chicken littles talk about the "bailouts" as if the loses have already been realized but then complain up a storm when someone posts about the government making profit on one of the deals because the total loses have yet to be realized
Taxpayers Unlikely to Recover GM, Chrysler Investment (Update2) - Bloomberg.com

Ok well here is 80+ billion that they are admitting now is lost never to be repaid, and this is only the beginning. We cannot even account for where most of the 700 billion went, much less expect to be repaid. 4 billion in "profit" looks really insignificant next to 80 billion in losses. Chicken Little? Yea right, get a clue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 12:08 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,921,177 times
Reputation: 4459
bank loan amount: $204,476,764,000
Total repaid: -$70,387,452,000
Capital Purchase Program total still due: $134,089,312,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
2,221 posts, read 5,293,649 times
Reputation: 1703
Of course chalking up a couple hundred million in profit from a financial institution's TARP repayment when they received five or ten billion of our money through the back door in pass-through payments from the AIG bailout is the exact sort of accounting foolishness that got us here.

It's an insider-rigged, corrupt, stinking mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Heartland Florida
9,324 posts, read 26,763,852 times
Reputation: 5038
WOW I just made 10.00 from selling lemonade! Never mind that it took me 100.00 in supplies to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,095,341 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
Ok well here is 80+ billion that they are admitting now is lost never to be repaid, and this is only the beginning. We cannot even account for where most of the 700 billion went, much less expect to be repaid. 4 billion in "profit" looks really insignificant next to 80 billion in losses. Chicken Little? Yea right, get a clue.
You are just demonstrating my point, counting the loses while ignoring that the bailout was a bunch of loans and the performance of those loans will only be known long term.

Any collection of loans is going to have defaults, the question is where the gains on the performing loans will make up for it. This question won't be answered for many years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top