Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2009, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,481 posts, read 6,309,195 times
Reputation: 9539

Advertisements

To all those of you who keep crying about banks getting bailed out, please read. I've tried telling you people that the "bailout" was a huge money making venture for the government. Also, this profit will quadruple if the government starts selling their 34% stake in Citigroup at the current share prices.

Report: US makes $4 billion from bailout banks - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Report-US-makes-4-billion-apf-1832981578.html?x=0&.v=2 - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2009, 04:14 PM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,403,413 times
Reputation: 18729
Shush! The "black helicopter crowd" will start saying this is some kind of secret tax if is not a money loser...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 04:26 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,290,858 times
Reputation: 5194
When the entire original $700 billion is repaid, (which will never happen) perhaps we can begin to assess if we made a profit or not. Until then we are in the hole. To say it was a money maker is ludicrous propaganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
You really have to "net" it against the total bailout and how much we may lose.
Until all the money is returned and/or accounted for I don't think they should be yelling "profit" quite so soon.

That GM money is gone and AIG, Fannie, Freddie aren't doing too well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 06:25 PM
 
975 posts, read 1,755,352 times
Reputation: 524
Forget it Kid, they can't take it. In order for this to be accepted 3/4ths of the posters here would have to admit they might be wrong.

A word to the wise (assuming there are any here): A mind is like an umbrella: It only works when it's open.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 06:31 PM
 
Location: The Milky Way Galaxy
2,256 posts, read 6,958,693 times
Reputation: 1520
This is the equivalent of when you gamble. You spend $50 and make $5 back on that $50. In the meantime you've spent $200 and lost that.

With the amount this administration and Congress has spent, $4B back is pocket change. And how much do you want to bet its not even going where it should be going?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 06:50 PM
 
Location: H-town, TX.
3,503 posts, read 7,501,954 times
Reputation: 2232
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
You really have to "net" it against the total bailout and how much we may lose.
Until all the money is returned and/or accounted for I don't think they should be yelling "profit" quite so soon.

That GM money is gone and AIG, Fannie, Freddie aren't doing too well.
Word.

I remember right after the first go-round of bailouts when Wall Street cheered that some bailout banks were in the black and stocks soared...then stocks bled off once those same rocket scientists realized that those banks did not necessarily have a operating profit minus bailout money AND they still had serious debt to deal with.

The Big Picture...can be a doozy. Especially since Citigroup and BofA can wipe this "profit" out. Let's just celebrate anyway!

Business & Technology | Bailouts yield U.S. profits — for now | Seattle Times Newspaper


Still, all the profits taxpayers have won could be wiped out by two deeply troubled institutions.

Both Citigroup and Bank of America are holding mortgages and other loans once worth billions of dollars but whose revised values are uncertain. If they prove "toxic" because they cannot attract buyers, they could leave large holes in the banks' balance sheets.

Neither bank is ready to repay its bailout money soon, even though their stock prices have surged in the past month, leaving the government sitting on paper profits of about $18 billion between them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,481 posts, read 6,309,195 times
Reputation: 9539
I happen to agree about the automakers. The money given to GM and Chrystler is more than likely gone forever, and never should have been given in the first place. The was a true bailout, and was as much about the UAW union as it was the automakers. As bad as it would have been for the workers, and those of other related companies such as auto parts manufacturers, these two incompetent companies should have been allowed to fail.

The bailout loans given to banks was really more like a very expensive loan program, and I believe most institutions who were given TARP funds will eventually repay it, and will continue to pay the government dividends on it in the meantime. Of course, some will fail and the investments in those banks will be lost, but overall, the TARP program will be very profitable for the government. The article I linked above states $4 billion in profits from the big banks and another $35 million from smaller banks. I believe that the governments 34% stake in Citi is currently worth around $12 or $13 billion more than the original $45 billion that Citi took, at it's current share price. Also, Bank Of America, who took $45 billion in TARP funds, pays the government over $700 million per quarter in prefered share dividends related to the TARP investment. At this rate, the taxpayer should hope Bank Of America NEVER pays back their TARP. Here is their press release from the end of Q2 announcing the government dividend payment, which they also paid in April (Q1), and will pay again in Sept (Q3).

Bank of America to Pay $713 Million in TARP Preferred Dividends

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are pigs of a different oink, because they are both government sponsored entities to begin with. As such, they were already subject to tighter government control and regulation, which is why these are the two companies that led us into this mess to begin with. These two companies were already under the type of strict government oversight that the Obama administration now would like to extend to the rest of the financial world. How did that work out for Fannie and Freddie?

Last edited by treasurekidd; 08-31-2009 at 07:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,481 posts, read 6,309,195 times
Reputation: 9539
Quote:
With the amount this administration and Congress has spent, $4B back is pocket change
MGT04, the $4 billion is profit, and is in ADDITION to the TARP funds that the banks have repaid (Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, US Bancorp, Morgan Stanley, Capitol One, BB&T Corp, Northern Trust, American Express, Bank Of New York, State Street Bank and many smaller banks have paid back all of the TARP funds they borrowed, totalling over $68 billion). The $4 billion is profit.

Quote:
Neither bank is ready to repay its bailout money soon
You are right about Bank Of America, and Wells Fargo as well. Citigroup will not be "paying back" anything, because they have already converted their TARP debt into equity. In other words, they've traded their debt to the government for stock, and now the gov't owns 34% of Citi, and it's investment ($45 billion originally) is now worth somewhere around $55 to $60 billion at it's current share price. This is not hard stuff folks.

Last edited by treasurekidd; 08-31-2009 at 07:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2009, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,481 posts, read 6,309,195 times
Reputation: 9539
OOPS, look what JUST popped up on the Wall Street Journal. Must have been while I was typing my previous posts:

BofA Seeks to Repay a Portion of Bailout - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top