Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-29-2012, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,563,928 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

So if your state took Race to the Top money then your state has to comply with the Fed mandates of it. The NYTimes had an article about NYS and how they have to comply. Race to the Top though seems to be passing the buck for how to implement and measure to the states. And in the case of NY they are passing the buck to the schools. IMHO this does not bode well.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/ed...?ref=education
By adding just one-third of one percent to state coffers, the feds get to implement their version of education reform.

That includes rating teachers and principals by their students’ scores on state tests; using those ratings to dismiss teachers with low scores and to pay bonuses to high scorers; and reducing local control of education.

Second, the secretary of education, Arne Duncan, and his education scientists do not have to do the dirty work.
.. it is the state’s responsibility to create a system of alternative ratings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2012, 08:49 AM
 
Location: East Side Milwaukee
711 posts, read 1,690,869 times
Reputation: 454
Isn't that what they signed up for? Are you surprised by this, or think this is somehow bad?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 08:53 AM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,250,221 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse276 View Post
Isn't that what they signed up for? Are you surprised by this, or think this is somehow bad?

I find it frightening. As a teacher in North Carolina (a Race for the top state) it is obvious that this program is intended to weed out veteran teachers and create an endless cycle of replacing teachers every 2-3 years--HOW MANY TEACHERS WILL EVER HAVE 100% PASSING?) or just increase the likelihood of getting students to pass by any means necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Space Coast
1,988 posts, read 5,388,758 times
Reputation: 2768
I've been saying since Arne Duncan was appointed that RTTT will one day make NCLB look like a cakewalk. Every administration that tries to 'improve' education just messes it up even more... as if elected officials know education better than those who do it for a living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 06:37 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,329,518 times
Reputation: 3696
Happy to say that Texas did NOT take the Race to the Top money. Just about the only good thing that Gov Perry's done lately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2012, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,563,928 times
Reputation: 27720
What teacher would go work at an inner city school with high dropout rates knowing they will be judged, not on their work, but on how many of their students pass the state test ?

The inner city schools will be empty and run by long term subs while the suburban schools will have a waiting list of teachers wanting to work there.

If you job hinges on 20+ strangers and how well they do on a test then you want to make sure you get the best and brightest 20+ strangers to teach, not 10 with the other 10 just along for the ride until they are old enough to drop out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2012, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Central CT, sometimes FL and NH.
4,541 posts, read 6,811,834 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eresh View Post
I've been saying since Arne Duncan was appointed that RTTT will one day make NCLB look like a cakewalk. Every administration that tries to 'improve' education just messes it up even more... as if elected officials know education better than those who do it for a living.
You're right. My fellow educators complained about George Bush and NCLB. Bush would tell you exactly what his feelings were about education and teachers didn't like what they heard. Barack Obama pretended to be supportive of teachers and appointed his henchman, Arne Duncan to do the dirty work. Duncan has no real education experience. He was a sociology major who went on to play basketball in Australia after college. He used his Chicago family connections to gain an appointment by Chicago Mayor Daly to run an after-school Chicago experiment. He never taught in a classroom or ran an individual school as a principal.

I would much rather have someone be honest with their feelings and beliefs than to appear to be on your side and work behind the scenes to meet their own agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top