Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-02-2016, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bg7 View Post
Good grief. I can barely believe that Limbaugh article. His stupidity is spectacular.


fwiw I don't classify myself as either conservative or democrat.
i'll take El Rushbo over the Huffington Post.

You sneer that he's stupid but liberal Darwinists sure seem defensive over his joke. He's even trending on Facebook for it, and conservatives never trend on Facebook.

Last edited by ClemVegas; 06-02-2016 at 10:38 PM..

 
Old 06-02-2016, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077
There are observed instances of secondary speciation—which is not what Darwinism needs—but no observed instances of primary speciation, not even in bacteria. British bacteriologist Alan H. Linton looked for confirmed reports of primary speciation and concluded in 2001: “None exists in the literature claiming that one species has been shown to evolve into another. Bacteria, the simplest form of independent life, are ideal for this kind of study, with generation times of twenty to thirty minutes, and populations achieved after eighteen hours. But throughout 150 years of the science of bacteriology, there is no evidence that one species of bacteria has changed into another.”49

Why Darwinism Is False | Center for Science and Culture
 
Old 06-03-2016, 03:47 PM
 
17,183 posts, read 22,902,669 times
Reputation: 17478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
he was making a point and satirizing the evolution theory.

liberals have never proven evolution. it is a religion for them. it doesn't make any sense. How do more complex lifeforms sponteanously orginate from less complex lifeforms.

this is liberal reasoning:

I don't believe there is a God.

Thus, evolution happened.

No evidence is required.
 
Old 06-03-2016, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077




The Top Ten Scientific Problems with Biological and Chemical Evolution | Center for Science and Culture


Indeed, in 2008 the journal New Scientist reported that, since the days of Professor Newman, the list of vestigial organs "grew, then shrank again" to the point that today "biologists are extremely wary of talking about vestigial organs at all."158 Structures that were previously -- and incorrectly -- considered to be vestigial include:
  • The tonsils: At one time, they were routinely removed. Now it's known they serve a purpose in the lymph system to help fight infection.159
  • The coccyx (tailbone): Many evolutionists still claim this is a hold-over from the tails of our supposed primate ancestors,160 but it's actually a vital part of our skeleton, used for attaching muscles, tendons, and ligaments that support the bones in our pelvis.
  • The thyroid: This gland in the neck was once believed to have no purpose, and was ignored or even destroyed by medical doctors operating under false Darwinian assumptions. Now scientists know that it is vital for regulating metabolism.
  • The appendix: Darwinian scientists have claimed the appendix is a "vestige of our herbivorous ancestry,"161 and over eons of evolution its function in humans has been diminished, or lost. But it's now known that the appendix performs important functions, such as providing a storehouse for beneficial bacteria, producing white blood cells, and playing important roles during fetal development.162 In light of this evidence, Duke University immunologist William Parker observed that "Many biology texts today still refer to the appendix as a 'vestigial organ'" but "it's time to correct the textbooks."163
 
Old 06-03-2016, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077
Violence Breaks Out at Trump Rally in San Jose, Protesters Hurl Eggs, Throw Punches, Intimidate Supporters - ABC News

Liberal anti-Trump protestors attacked Trump supporters in San Jose yesterday. Not a seeing a whole lot of education there.
 
Old 06-03-2016, 04:48 PM
 
197 posts, read 261,149 times
Reputation: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post



The Top Ten Scientific Problems with Biological and Chemical Evolution | Center for Science and Culture


Indeed, in 2008 the journal New Scientist reported that, since the days of Professor Newman, the list of vestigial organs "grew, then shrank again" to the point that today "biologists are extremely wary of talking about vestigial organs at all."158 Structures that were previously -- and incorrectly -- considered to be vestigial include:

  • The tonsils: At one time, they were routinely removed. Now it's known they serve a purpose in the lymph system to help fight infection.159
  • The coccyx (tailbone): Many evolutionists still claim this is a hold-over from the tails of our supposed primate ancestors,160 but it's actually a vital part of our skeleton, used for attaching muscles, tendons, and ligaments that support the bones in our pelvis.
  • The thyroid: This gland in the neck was once believed to have no purpose, and was ignored or even destroyed by medical doctors operating under false Darwinian assumptions. Now scientists know that it is vital for regulating metabolism.
  • The appendix: Darwinian scientists have claimed the appendix is a "vestige of our herbivorous ancestry,"161 and over eons of evolution its function in humans has been diminished, or lost. But it's now known that the appendix performs important functions, such as providing a storehouse for beneficial bacteria, producing white blood cells, and playing important roles during fetal development.162 In light of this evidence, Duke University immunologist William Parker observed that "Many biology texts today still refer to the appendix as a 'vestigial organ'" but "it's time to correct the textbooks."163
^The tonsils thing is fascinating and such a great example of how little we know and how arrogant the medical doctors and industry is about such things.
 
Old 06-03-2016, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,895 posts, read 3,896,291 times
Reputation: 5855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
Violence Breaks Out at Trump Rally in San Jose, Protesters Hurl Eggs, Throw Punches, Intimidate Supporters - ABC News

Liberal anti-Trump protestors attacked Trump supporters in San Jose yesterday. Not a seeing a whole lot of education there.

They're protesting a bigot.
 
Old 06-03-2016, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077
you think anybody who doesn't agree with your liberal politicis is a bigot though.

protesting and getting violent are two dfferent things.

nearly all violent protestors in this country are left wingers and it is a function of their intolerance and bigotry for people who disagree with them.

given thousands of lberal Democrats have switched parties to vote for Trump, who nobody would call a conservative, it is hilarious other liberals are calling him a bigot.

Last edited by ClemVegas; 06-03-2016 at 07:07 PM..
 
Old 06-03-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,895 posts, read 3,896,291 times
Reputation: 5855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
You vote for the party that presided over slavery, segregation, secession, and Jim Crow and can't be bothered to change its name but then call other people bigots.
This is such a silly argument.

How many of the racist Southern Democrats of the pre-1960s, if they had been alive 50 years later, would have voted for Barack Obama? How many would support the following key Democratic platforms: a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants; Affirmative Action; gay marriage; Title IX. The answer: none. That's why they and their political heirs all switched over to the Republican Party and now make up the conservative base.
 
Old 06-03-2016, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
10,105 posts, read 7,394,692 times
Reputation: 4077
nobody switched parties.

Robert KKK Byrd didn't switch and Obama eulogized and gushed over him.

It doesn't make sense that white racists who know KKK Byrd and Al Gore's father went to bat for them to filibuster the Civil rights act then switched to the GOP over the decades. these were liberal voters, they don't just stop caring about liberalism and start voting conservaties.

gay marriage and what happened to blacks are no way similar. you guys love to equate the two. many black people including those who generally vote Democrat opposed government benefits for gay marriage.

Democrat party has always gotten the poor vote. it owned the south back in its racist days because most of the white people were poor. obviously there are a lot of poor black voters. The fact that black voters vote Democrat does not disprove most of the white racists have been Democrats. why would white racist hav ea problem with black voters voting the way they want?

Generallly racists are poor and uneducated, and the Democrat party wins most of the poor and uneducated. That is the whole point o their party, lock up the poor party with big government spending and entitlements.

prior to Obama, the previous Democrat presidents or candidates had ties to old south racism and segregationists, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Gore. Gore was the son of one of the two men who filibustered the 1964 civil rights act. CLinton was the protege of William Fullbright who supported segregation. Clinton gave him a Presdiential Medal of Freedom. LBJ said several incredibly racist things.

meanwhile , GOP has had Nixon, an integregationist, Reagan, the Bushes, McCain, Romney and now Trump, none of which ahve any ties wo th the old south. but you try to say GOP is the racist party.

some racists no doubt did vote for GOP when Obama won his primaries, that doesn't mean the GOP is racist. it means GOP was only alternative. Obama won a ton of votes simply b/c he is black so that goes both ways.

Last edited by ClemVegas; 06-03-2016 at 07:43 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top