Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If I were a lib and I saw that several candidates were within a few percentage points of my candidate, knowing that those votes will eventually move to one candidate, I would be really concerned at this point.
If I were a lib and I saw that several candidates were within a few percentage points of my candidate, knowing that those votes will eventually move to one candidate, I would be really concerned at this point.
If I were a right winger and saw that all seven republican candidates were losing to just one democrat, I would be really concerned at this point.
How do you figure that when all 7 of those candidates votes will for the most part consolidate behind one candidate?
I think that is the point they miss, as well as the media. No sitting president should be that close in the polls to candidates just starting the run for the nomination.
just saw him on Chris Wallace, he still thinks Christie will jump in. If Christie doesn't he thinks Perry can hold on. I am not saying Perry can not, but let's get over the hope for Christie...
Nita
lol...Bill Kristol sort of has the Dick Morris syndrome in recent years. Whatever he predicts, the opposite happens. He just doesn't have the credibility he used to. I am with you on the Christie thing...let it go!
lol...Bill Kristol sort of has the Dick Morris syndrome in recent years. Whatever he predicts, the opposite happens. He just doesn't have the credibility he used to. I am with you on the Christie thing...let it go!
Bill Kristol, the former 'dubya' Bush 'mouthpiece' on FoxNews Sunday. The elitest 'insider' Neocon, who aided in help ruin our reputation and image, Worldwide. - Naw, Bill Kristol doesn't have any 'cred' left.
Romney is the only one who can win independents. Dems and GOP faithful will offset each other, no matter who runs. Moderates (i.e. independents) in SWING states decide who gets sworn in Jan 20, 2013. So debating who can hold the base may be fun, but its fruitless. It matters squat.
LOL, he'll hold the base enough to retain both coasts, that is 200 or so electoral votes. That means he needs fewer than 1/2 the swing state electoral votes, which is the reason a TP cannot beat him. He won most coastal states in '08 with a hefty percentage of votes to spare, so losing a small amount of base = a big so what.
I don't think he can muster the 200 electoral votes right now, much less any of the swing states.. He is in worse shape than you believe he is..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
