Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Given that red states benefit so disproportionately from government spending, while the Republican's rich supporters benefit so generously from preferential treatment under our tax code, I'm sure you meant to type:
But anyone can make a typo, so I'm not going to mock you.
I cant believe people are dumb enough to continue to post that nonsense. They benefit because they provide services to the federal government. Its not for free..
An awful, tremendous amount of denial took place on these very pages after the first debate.
The Dems did not "take their lumps" and made every excuse in the book.
This continued until they realized no one was buying any of it at all and it was sounding ridiculus and pathetic.
It got to the point that it was adding to the damage already done by Obama's sad performance.
I will agree Obama did not look so sad sack this time but spent most of the night regurgitating promise and rhetoric from 4 years ago.
That does not equate with "winning".
We know what that wrought and we don't care for it.
He made clear he wants more Gun control.
The '94 "Crime Bill" was allowed to expire greatly due to it unpopularity.
He purposly mislead on Benghazi and did so again in the debate.
There are audios from Shows he appeared on after the initial statement in the Rose Garden that are damning him now.
The police could have arrived and arrested Romney for child molestation during the debate and many Republicans would still believe he won. Watching the spin machine after the election. It is not a surprise. I really don't expect intellectual honesty from the right anymore. That would require both intellect and honesty...a rare combination coming from the right these days.
I see them making up conspiracy theories and excuses, the lamestream liberal media, the moderator is an Obamabot, blah blah blah blah.
The Dems took their lumps, why can't you guys do the same
Time to man up
Romney won. Clearly.
Obama stammered, stumbled and bumbled and rambled all over the place, much as he had done in the first debate. We saw the same man, though perhaps more animated. His "agressiveness" was ineffective, because he lies. Romney called him out on them.
When Obama tried to interrupt Romney, Rommey made him sit down. He was done.
And when Candy Crowley became a shill for Obama, and he took advantage of it, when everyone knew he was lying; game over.
Take from person A - > Government takes huge handling fee -> Person B gets the bones.
Look at Social Security, people get a whopping 1.7% raise that is around $12 - $45 A MONTH. Whahoo! This is what you are fighting tooth and nail for... a 1.7% raise
Oh, really? We are in "meltdown." How and when did he "save it?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile
How is that worse? Remember Romney said no bailout for the car companies. Where would we be if GM and others had failed?
GM should have been allowed to go through normal bankruptcy. Obama forced his will, and the bond holders got screwed. That was actually illegal. The bond holders should have been paid first, according to law.
GM has not been "saved." They still owe billions to the taxpayers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile
You are so dissatisfied with Obama how about you tell us how the repub's would have saved us. Remember also that McCain would have had us in Iran real quick. Explain how that would affect our economy.
Please get your head out of the sand. We are in worse shape now than when Obama took office, and evreyone knows it (but you ardent Obamatrons).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.