Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Folks you don't draw 30k crowds in Ohio outside of OSU and lose.
There's a red wave coming and it's going to up end Washington the media and liberals. We are in an environment where even the NY Times is sensing something afoot for Romney in PA.
[quote=walidm;26784326]Nate's not alone. Here's nine more statistician's who don't give Romney a chance.
Nine 2012 Electoral College predictions have Obama ahead[/QUOTE.
There is always talk about the future of the country and how much is at stake. This time it is very clear how right that is. A choice between Republican plutocracy vs the continued financial and social recovery of our nation. We need the House back and we need a greater majority in the Senate, a progressive majority on the Supreme Court, etc. I think most people recognize that the plutocrats cannot be allowed to win.
Folks you don't draw 30k crowds in Ohio outside of OSU and lose.
There's a red wave coming and it's going to up end Washington the media and liberals. We are in an environment where even the NY Times is sensing something afoot for Romney in PA.
Sure you do.
OSU has drawn larger crowds for the loser. Wolverines know this.
Series record Michigan leads OSU, 58–43–6 OSU has never been above .500 in the history of the rivalry.
See, you can draw massive crowds outside OSU and still be a loser, ask a Wolverine. Or a loser, like Mitt Romney
Careful...the last time a liberal laughed and said that "Republicans were a dying breed", Bush won....and then won again. And don't forget the PUMAs...they're still pissed off at Obama for what he did to Hillary four years ago.
They are not pissed off enough to vote for Romney.
While the MSM has utterly failed in informing the public of the closeness of the election, and of the downward trend of the President's numbers, Obama's narcissism and Alinsky-esque roots may preclude his going on national television and calmly telling his "folks" to go home. Is there any doubt that Obama would certainly embrace organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss? Such banana republic tactics would sends a clear warning to all Americans about being more careful about for whom they vote in future elections.
A majority of Americans selecting Mitt Romney? I know why the idiot frat boy was reelected in 2004, but the circumstances are vastly different today than they were in 2004.
And I'd like to think Americans have learned a thing or three since those dark days of Bush/Cheney. I'm confident a slim majority of us know the difference between right and wrong.
Yes that things can get a lot worse!~
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
lol....
