Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-15-2013, 07:17 AM
 
174 posts, read 154,796 times
Reputation: 139

Advertisements

Frank Lautenberg will not seek re-election next year | NJ.com

I guess voluntarily retiring sounded like a better option than getting primaried into retirement by Cory Booker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2013, 07:23 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,398,124 times
Reputation: 3086
^^^

To be fair Lautenberg is older then the hills. If he ran he would be pushing into Strom Thurmond territory by the end of his term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,994,605 times
Reputation: 2479
A man needs to know his limitations . Senator Lautenberg like Pope Benedict 15th is setting a great example. It is hard to take leave from something you live for but you don't need to die with your boots on!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,797,202 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwruckman View Post
A man needs to know his limitations . Senator Lautenberg like Pope Benedict 15th is setting a great example. It is hard to take leave from something you live for but you don't need to die with your boots on!
My thoughts exactly. Would he have lost the primary? Who knows but he is stepping down with class, has served his state well and it is time to turn over the reins to someone else. This is like Ron Paul did. He knew it was time to get out and enjoy a little life. There is life after politics for some.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,446,996 times
Reputation: 4070
Default Lautenberg (Senator, D-NJ) To Retire

Lautenberg is the last WWII vet serving in the senate. I'm glad he's leaving on his own terms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 07:50 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,498,655 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Lautenberg (Senator, D-NJ) To Retire


It's about time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 08:14 AM
 
77 posts, read 82,233 times
Reputation: 106
That makes five 2014 Senate retirees so far.

Chambliss (R-GA)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Johanns (R-NE)

The two Republican retirees will change little. In each case, the races probably get ever-so-slightly more competitive, though in the case of Nebraska, if Governor Heineman runs then it'll probably be even safer than if Johanns ran again. At any rate, they're both near locks for the GOP.

Lautenberg's retiring changes little as well. In fact, it probably makes the seat slightly more easy for the Democrats to retain.

However, the other two retirings will affect the races. Rockefeller would have been a strong re-election favorite. Now, Shelly Moore Capito will be the strong favorite, so long as she can avoid getting Tea Party'd into primary oblivion. Even then, the race would probably be a toss-up, better for the GOP than had Rockefeller run.

In Iowa, the seat goes from being safe to being less than safe; how much so depends on who the GOP nominates.

So far, a very difficult cycle for the Democrats has gotten somewhat more difficult overall with these retirings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,797,202 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jestak View Post
That makes five 2014 Senate retirees so far.

Chambliss (R-GA)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Johanns (R-NE)

The two Republican retirees will change little. In each case, the races probably get ever-so-slightly more competitive, though in the case of Nebraska, if Governor Heineman runs then it'll probably be even safer than if Johanns ran again. At any rate, they're both near locks for the GOP.

Lautenberg's retiring changes little as well. In fact, it probably makes the seat slightly more easy for the Democrats to retain.

However, the other two retirings will affect the races. Rockefeller would have been a strong re-election favorite. Now, Shelly Moore Capito will be the strong favorite, so long as she can avoid getting Tea Party'd into primary oblivion. Even then, the race would probably be a toss-up, better for the GOP than had Rockefeller run.

In Iowa, the seat goes from being safe to being less than safe; how much so depends on who the GOP nominates.

So far, a very difficult cycle for the Democrats has gotten somewhat more difficult overall with these retirings.
I would not be at all surprised to see WV go Republican with the last Rockerfeller calling it quits. IA might very well go Republicans but it can be considered a toos up, as you said. Neither Repbulican retiring will hurt the Republicans. I think the Republicans will pick up one seat from the the Democrats, but there are still many senators that might hang it up and who knows how that will play out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,193 posts, read 19,476,372 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
I would not be at all surprised to see WV go Republican with the last Rockerfeller calling it quits. IA might very well go Republicans but it can be considered a toos up, as you said. Neither Repbulican retiring will hurt the Republicans. I think the Republicans will pick up one seat from the the Democrats, but there are still many senators that might hang it up and who knows how that will play out.
West Virginia is something that the GOP can pick up with Congresswoman Capito going for the Seat, however the tea party is going hard for her, so Primary could be a bigger issue.

Iowa's potential competitiveness is based off who wins the GOP Primary. The Dems have the edge with Braley, but Latham can make it competitive. However, Steve King (who has a very good shot at winning the Primary) is about as unelectable as it can get statewide. He wins the GOP nomination, he gets demolished. He is bats*** insane.

Speaking of bats*** insane, Georgia could be a tougher to hold then you might think. The GOP as a few interesting characters out there with Rep Broun leading the insane asylum. He gets the GOP nod, its a Democratic pick up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top