Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
again look at the 08 results...meanwhile obama is no longer the unknown, no longer the guy of 'hope and change'..less liked than 4 years ago
not saying this would change the national results...not saying obama didnt win...just saying that getting 100% of the vote in a section when there are at least 4 people running (jill stein and gary johnson still pulled in .5% each of the total phili vote) (plus an allowed write-in) is pretty fishy
I will take it for granted that you got different results from your Google search than I would have because of what you asked for and what I would have asked for.
The first two things on your page were from YouTube and leaners keep telling me that YouTube is not a good place, although the videos I post although on YouTube come from other sites.
The last four links on your page came from Think Progress and HuffPo and I never see either of them on my requests from Google. I try to ask for things from them in unbiased sounding words and your example wasn't very unbiased sounding. Maybe someday you will come to realize that all the search engines work the same way and always give you results that seem like what you want to know.
OK Roy every one is wrong but you, so if you have info on Election fraud and are not submitting that knowledge to the appropriate authorities you are aiding and abetting criminal behavior which is not only a felony in most courts but is also against forum rules...
Give it up, Roy. You were another victim of the conservative echo chamber, and got sucked into believing all of the pink cloud it spun all year. I know Romney's loss was a shock, but next time, trust the facts more than your beliefs. The most basic fact was Obama never lost his 44% approval rate from beginning to end. That was his floor, and it held as solid as a rock all year.
...
Not even that. All the GOP had to do was read the polls which all but Rasputin showed Obama with large electoral leads. Those polls the GOP called skewed/biased and summarily dismissed them, only for the polls to be 100% accurate on election night.
Not even that. All the GOP had to do was read the polls which all but Rasputin showed Obama with large electoral leads. Those polls the GOP called skewed/biased and summarily dismissed them, only for the polls to be 100% accurate on election night.
They are victims of their own propaganda.
You're referring to Fox election coverage? Anyway, I'm wondering if they are not losing viewer credibility.
There are preliminary reports of progressive media being shut down in several states just post-election. Coincidence, or possibly sour grapes by station management? Democrats won in areas where progressive media existed. That's speculation, but it's a brand new development. Some are rethinking the airwaves utilization issue, since they legally belong to the public at large but are utilized by conservative corporations for their own purposes.
You're referring to Fox election coverage? Anyway, I'm wondering if they are not losing viewer credibility.
There are preliminary reports of progressive media being shut down in several states just post-election. Coincidence, or possibly sour grapes by station management? Democrats won in areas where progressive media existed. That's speculation, but it's a brand new development. Some are rethinking the airwaves utilization issue, since they legally belong to the public at large but are utilized by conservative corporations for their own purposes.
It's all done on purpose... Fox News needs to keep the viewer enraged, angry, shocked, scared and full of skepticism.
I'm curious to know if Rove and others were in on it to keep the checks flowing.
Then again... CNN kept calling every debate after the 1st one a tie... I think all the news channels were in on it to make sure money kept flowing in from the superpacs.
Look out leaners, here comes another story about last week's election. I have ducked so you can start throwing your crap. I would like to have some real proof that this woman is wrong about what she says but don't think you can find any of that good old leaner proof.
I do not have proof of what she says but I am pretty sure that none of you can prove what she says to be untrue either. Maybe you know the proper words to prompt some search engine to find what you need so get to work.
I couldn't believe it when she said that one woman said she voted 4 times. It wouldn't take more than half a million people like that to get him ahead.
Much rather have them as sore losers than vengeful gloating winners
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
