Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2012, 10:37 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

It turns out the hopeful myth that Obama was despised by the US Military was a myth... here is how their money voted.

Quote:
Military Donors Rallied Late for Romney, But Obama Held Advantage

Mitt Romney won a small battle over military donors in his campaign's final weeks, but he still lost the war.

Throughout the 2012 presidential campaign, Barack Obama consistently received more financial backing from military donors than his GOP challenger, but Romney bested the president in the final weeks leading up to Election Day.

Overall in the election cycle, Obama received about $947,000 from retired and active military donors -- about $194,000 more than Romney -- but after Oct. 1, Romney had an advantage of nearly $83,000. He raised about $287,000 from the military in that time, compared with Obama's $205,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2012, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,461,350 times
Reputation: 4777
Wow that is interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 04:35 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23853
The soldiers are now a different bunch than those who went to war in Iraq 10 years ago. That war resulted in a high attrition rate among the enlisted, especially after both active duty and reserves were recalled back to iraq numerous times.
Enlistment is still pretty strong; there are still a lot of young men who are having difficulty finding private sector jobs. But those who enlist want to know the end is in sight in Afghanistan, and Obama has lived up to his word so far in pulling the troops out from there. At the same time, some Republicans are opposing a withdrawal. For a kid who enlisted due to financial reasons, the main concern is to get back home asap and in one piece. It's no surprise they would support the President, when Romney was all for continuing the occupation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 07:48 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
Not to mention hearing all the saber-rattling about attacking Iran!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:23 AM
Sco
 
4,259 posts, read 4,916,911 times
Reputation: 3373
Maybe the members of the military are sick and tired of Republicans using their lives like poker chips in a political game. It was obvious to anyone paying attention that Romney and the GOP were going to start a new war in Iran as soon as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,031,604 times
Reputation: 1464
They only counted donations greater than $200, so I doubt many on the enlisted side even counted in this "analysis". Furthermore, even if we take the highest figure - $947,000 - and divide by the minimum amount to be counted ($200), you only get 4,700 or so individuals represented. Our armed forces totals in the millions. Not a very accurate or honest representation there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 09:30 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
They only counted donations greater than $200, so I doubt many on the enlisted side even counted in this "analysis". Furthermore, even if we take the highest figure - $947,000 - and divide by the minimum amount to be counted ($200), you only get 4,700 or so individuals represented. Our armed forces totals in the millions. Not a very accurate or honest representation there.
Is that kinda like your ''math'' about jobs, the GDP, and the return of the GOP in 2012? Funny how spinning excuses is about all you ''hardcore conservatives'' have left to do anymore, isn't it...?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 03:27 PM
 
Location: the Beaver State
6,464 posts, read 13,434,579 times
Reputation: 3581
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
The soldiers are now a different bunch than those who went to war in Iraq 10 years ago. That war resulted in a high attrition rate among the enlisted, especially after both active duty and reserves were recalled back to iraq numerous times.
Enlistment is still pretty strong; there are still a lot of young men who are having difficulty finding private sector jobs. But those who enlist want to know the end is in sight in Afghanistan, and Obama has lived up to his word so far in pulling the troops out from there. At the same time, some Republicans are opposing a withdrawal. For a kid who enlisted due to financial reasons, the main concern is to get back home asap and in one piece. It's no surprise they would support the President, when Romney was all for continuing the occupation.
My brother in law was a staunch Republican when he was in. After two tours in Iraq, another in Afghanistan, and a couple in "god-forsaken-####-holes full of nothing but sand and people trying to kill me," he's back in the US, and in this exact boat. Voting for Romney just sounded like a good way to get more of his buddies killed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 04:00 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
They only counted donations greater than $200, so I doubt many on the enlisted side even counted in this "analysis". Furthermore, even if we take the highest figure - $947,000 - and divide by the minimum amount to be counted ($200), you only get 4,700 or so individuals represented. Our armed forces totals in the millions. Not a very accurate or honest representation there.
Enlisted members are generally apolitical and rarely if ever donate to campaigns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 04:48 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,031,604 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Enlisted members are generally apolitical and rarely if ever donate to campaigns.
Apolitical? I disagree, strong opinions on politics are always floating about the enlisted ranks. But I agree with the donation part, I would imagine most of the donations come from officer ranks or civilian DOD personel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top