Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2014, 04:42 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,875,157 times
Reputation: 49248

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Don't be too sure of that. He's not actually very well liked here. He only won in 2010 because the Republicans picked Angle instead of Lowden as their nominee, and while I respect Angle and what she stands for, she didn't have much chance of winning. Even with all the mud that the Democrats drug her through, it was still a reasonably close election, which should tell you something.

I personally don't think Reid is going to run again, but he DOES love his power, so he might. I would think that someone his age (the 2016 election is about a month before his 77th birthday) would want to retire and spend their remaining years with family, but he might just be so thirsty for power that he'll push his family aside and spend his last years playing politics. I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

Anyway, I just thought I'd give you a heads up from someone who actually lives in the state he represents (poorly), and pays attention to what the people around here think of him.
I would be very surprised if Reid wins again, if he runs. I think some people think more with the hearts than their heads. He was lucky to have pulled it out in 2010.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2014, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,210 posts, read 19,497,725 times
Reputation: 5309
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
I would be very surprised if Reid wins again, if he runs. I think some people think more with the hearts than their heads. He was lucky to have pulled it out in 2010.
2010 was a very Republican year and the GOP wasn't able to knock that of (granted that had quite a it to do with Angle). However, 2016 is a Presidential year, the greater turnout in a Presidential year would help Reid. Also the GOP has so much to defend in 2016 that the party resources in the Senate will be more on defense than offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,375,433 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
2010 was a very Republican year and the GOP wasn't able to knock that of (granted that had quite a it to do with Angle). However, 2016 is a Presidential year, the greater turnout in a Presidential year would help Reid. Also the GOP has so much to defend in 2016 that the party resources in the Senate will be more on defense than offense.
The other factor about Reid's chances - who would be his likely opponent?

Reid's soft-spoken persona is very deceptive if you don't know him. He's actually very shrewd, and has his fingers all over Nevada state politics, knows everything and everybody. He'll defuse or sideline potential political opponents by appointing them to other offices or convincing them to retire or get into private sector. He's never been very popular, but he somehow finds a way to win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,064,332 times
Reputation: 62204
I've been thinking about this. I think the Democrats stand a better chance of retaining the Senate if they run other Democrats against their own incumbents in the Democrat primaries. It would have to be Democrats not in the House and not working in the Obama administration. They would have to be able to say, they never supported or voted for Obamacare.

Is Clinton supporting any Democrat primary challengers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2014, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,875,157 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
2010 was a very Republican year and the GOP wasn't able to knock that of (granted that had quite a it to do with Angle). However, 2016 is a Presidential year, the greater turnout in a Presidential year would help Reid. Also the GOP has so much to defend in 2016 that the party resources in the Senate will be more on defense than offense.
I realize that, but I also know, as most of us do, 2010 win for him should never have happened. As for offense versus defense, this is going to be the case on both sides. Whether Reid wins or not, will have more to do with who the candidates are for President and how that race plays out. Everyone is so sure Hillary is unbeatable and will run: I am not convinced of either at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 10:21 AM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,774,011 times
Reputation: 524
You forget that in 2016 1/3rd of the Senate is up again (2010 GOPers for one) and the entire South is up, and if anyone does not think she has huge coat tails, then they are a political fool. If 2016 election day rolls up and she is the victor over the Republican candidate, then expect many coat tail votes to help her out in Congress (see 2008).

Just a fact of presidential elections, especially possibly popular ones (and Hillary is popular with the Democrats and some Independents).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,210 posts, read 19,497,725 times
Reputation: 5309
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
I realize that, but I also know, as most of us do, 2010 win for him should never have happened. As for offense versus defense, this is going to be the case on both sides. Whether Reid wins or not, will have more to do with who the candidates are for President and how that race plays out. Everyone is so sure Hillary is unbeatable and will run: I am not convinced of either at this point.

It is 24-10. It isn't like the Republicans are defending only a few more seats, it is more than double the amount of seats, many of them in swing states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2014, 03:12 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,687,580 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
The logic is simple: Hillary Clinton is an opportunist. She badly wants to break the male-only Presidential "glass ceiling," but only if she can come away with a legacy to match it. Given Republicans abject Hatred of All Things Clinton,â„¢ I predict that Hillary Clinton will view a GOP Senate and House Majority a threat to her very ambition to actually get anything done as the first female President. The chances that Democrats retake one or both of the chambers in 2016 would be so slim, that a 2014 GOP steamroll would/will force her to retire politically instead of running for President in 2016.

No doubt about it, she's waiting on the 2014 midterms to make a decision.

What do you think?
Your logic is sound !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2014, 03:38 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,308,965 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Your logic is sound !!!
You could be right, but it's just as likely to be wishful thinking. If the GOP sweeps Congress and starts sending Obama legislation that he feels compelled to veto, and Hillary continues to outpoll other possible Democrat candidates, she'll feel tremendous pressure to run because she'll be see by Democrats as the best chance to prevent a total right wing takeover of the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2014, 05:02 PM
 
16,647 posts, read 8,656,893 times
Reputation: 19464
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
It's a prediction, not a fact.

However, the GOP has a stranglehold on the House for at least a decade by most accounts. If the GOP takes the Senate in 2014, do you think Democrats could retake it in 2016? Would Hillary accept a divided government with the same negative results as the Barack Obama presidency? I don't think she would be inclined to take that risk.
Hillary is way too narcissistic to think she could not overcome the "vast right-wing conspiracy". Plus Slick Willey is just dying to get back into the WH, so much so that he campaigned for Obama even though he & Hillary cannot stand him.

These two more than most others are political opportunists, and most everything they do is with cold calculation. I would be surprised if she didn't run for the reason you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top