Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-24-2014, 06:34 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,974,850 times
Reputation: 7458

Advertisements

Quote:
Michigan's closely watched U.S. Senate contest is back to a two-point race.
Michigan now shifts from Leans Democrat back to a Toss-Up in the Rasmussen Reports 2014 Senate Balance of Power Rankings.
Link: Election 2014: Michigan Senate - Rasmussen Reports™

Great news from the state of Michigan today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2014, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Norman, OK
3,478 posts, read 7,264,836 times
Reputation: 1201
I don't see Land pulling it out (barring some super October surprise).

The Democrats need to turn their focus to Alaska, as Begich is now falling behind Sullivan, and keep going strong in Iowa, where it is still very close and Ernst has a good shot of taking that seat. I think the Democrats are also safe in NH, despite a somewhat strong challenge from Scott Brown. I just don't see him winning that seat over a popular former governor.

I think the Democrats are losing their positions in Kentucky and even Georgia (though it is closer here, but because of the name 'Nunn', not her positions), where the Republicans are still holding on and should probably retain those seats.

If the Republicans want to make some plays, they need to continue to invest in Iowa and then turn into some investment in North Carolina, where Kay Hagan is playing the moderate card very well and marginalizing Tillis. The Republicans also need to keep the pressure up on Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, as she is still running somewhat close and has name recognition to help her in that state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 07:41 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,416,550 times
Reputation: 4025
Michigan is not deep blue. Michigan is historically a blue-leaning battleground state that is trending blue as of the last 30 years of elections.

For the midwest, only Michigan and Illinois have been trending "more blue." Iowa, Wisconsin, and Ohio have little trend (they go as the country goes), and every other midwestern state has been trending GOP. The most shocking trend is Minnesota, which has been trending towards red for the last 30 years or so. Remember Minnesota didn't even vote for Reagan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,214 posts, read 19,512,084 times
Reputation: 5312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Link: Election 2014: Michigan Senate - Rasmussen Reports™

Great news from the state of Michigan today.
All recent polls on this race

Peters +2
Peters +3
Peters +5
Peters +2
Peters +7
Peters +9
Peters +5
Peters +10
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 08:01 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,974,850 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by wxjay View Post
I don't see Land pulling it out (barring some super October surprise).

The Democrats need to turn their focus to Alaska, as Begich is now falling behind Sullivan, and keep going strong in Iowa, where it is still very close and Ernst has a good shot of taking that seat. I think the Democrats are also safe in NH, despite a somewhat strong challenge from Scott Brown. I just don't see him winning that seat over a popular former governor.

I think the Democrats are losing their positions in Kentucky and even Georgia (though it is closer here, but because of the name 'Nunn', not her positions), where the Republicans are still holding on and should probably retain those seats.

If the Republicans want to make some plays, they need to continue to invest in Iowa and then turn into some investment in North Carolina, where Kay Hagan is playing the moderate card very well and marginalizing Tillis. The Republicans also need to keep the pressure up on Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, as she is still running somewhat close and has name recognition to help her in that state.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. The mere fact that the Senate races are competitive in places like Michigan and New Hampshire is very important because it forces the Democrats and their big money PACs and special interest groups to spend money in those states. Without the competitiveness of candidates like Land, Brown, Gardner, etc., the big money donors that are bankrolling the Democrats' continued power grab could focus on other races that Republicans are leading in, like GA, AK, KY, AR, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 08:06 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,974,850 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
All recent polls on this race

Peters +2
Peters +3
Peters +5
Peters +2
Peters +7
Peters +9
Peters +5
Peters +10
Yup, Peters and the Democrats can't be pleased with that trend. I understand why you omitted the dates of the polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,214 posts, read 19,512,084 times
Reputation: 5312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Yup, Peters and the Democrats can't be pleased with that trend. I understand why you omitted the dates of the polls.
They were all taken within two weeks, there really is no trend there considering how close the polls were taken to each other. Poll average is 5.4, which puts in basically in the same category as McConnell and Grimes (McConnell 5.2)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 08:43 AM
 
3,620 posts, read 3,843,874 times
Reputation: 1512
dismiss trace, just a bit for the gop who has no original opinions on anything.

here's the current line on the michigan race, which is the real thing to look at.

Michigan - United States Senate elections - November 4, 2014
Tue 11/4 10021 Gary Peters (D) wins MI election -1200
6:00AM 10022 Terry Lynn Land (R) wins MI election +600


peters is looking great right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 08:44 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,976,467 times
Reputation: 11790
Strange, RCP has Peters winning MI
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 09:54 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,974,850 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
dismiss trace, just a bit for the gop who has no original opinions on anything.

here's the current line on the michigan race, which is the real thing to look at.

Michigan - United States Senate elections - November 4, 2014
Tue 11/4 10021 Gary Peters (D) wins MI election -1200
6:00AM 10022 Terry Lynn Land (R) wins MI election +600


peters is looking great right now.
I have an original opinion about you, but I'm not allowed to give it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top