Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2015, 11:05 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,358,694 times
Reputation: 40731

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
based on what, her class warfare rhetoric?
How many votes are based on anything but rhetoric, no matter the topic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2015, 11:15 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,266,686 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
How many votes are based on anything but rhetoric, no matter the topic?


that was my question, what has she accomplished other than her class warfare rhetoric?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2015, 01:39 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,551,860 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I think it's time for ADRPH, anyone but a Democratic or Republican Party Hack.
I can't disagree with that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2015, 04:33 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,358,694 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
that was my question, what has she accomplished other than her class warfare rhetoric?
What does it matter? The Constitution makes no mention of accomplishment as a requirement to become POTUS and history has told us a number times it's not a practical requirement either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2015, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,227,653 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
Imagine for a moment that Hilary said "Ahh, screw it!"

What other Democratic candidate would you like to see running in 2016?
Anyone other than Warren. She's flat out crazy. Take her and Clinton out and I might even vote Democrat!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2015, 09:49 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,551,860 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What does it matter? The Constitution makes no mention of accomplishment as a requirement to become POTUS and history has told us a number times it's not a practical requirement either.
True. After all just look at our current POTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2015, 10:14 AM
 
16,552 posts, read 8,584,349 times
Reputation: 19384
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What does it matter? The Constitution makes no mention of accomplishment as a requirement to become POTUS and history has told us a number times it's not a practical requirement either.


Ever heard of the word obtuse?

Sure there is no specific requirement to have experience/qualifications to be POTUS beyond what is in the Constitution, and our current POTUS is a perfect example of that.
Yet common sense dictates that you do not take someone out of the mail room and make them a CEO of a Fortune 100 company and expect to be successful.

The best training for a modern president is being a successful governor. Hence why most successful modern presidents have had such experience on their resumes.
Can you take a neophyte and give them on the job training? I guess you can, but do not expect them to be as successful as someone who already has the experience and acumen to do the job on day one.

We are a country of 300+million, and while we would never believe a beat cop should be promoted directly to police chief, we somehow are willing to elect the equivalent to run the largest economy, and be the most powerful person on the planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 12:03 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post


Ever heard of the word obtuse?

Sure there is no specific requirement to have experience/qualifications to be POTUS beyond what is in the Constitution, and our current POTUS is a perfect example of that.
Yet common sense dictates that you do not take someone out of the mail room and make them a CEO of a Fortune 100 company and expect to be successful.

The best training for a modern president is being a successful governor. Hence why most successful modern presidents have had such experience on their resumes.
Can you take a neophyte and give them on the job training? I guess you can, but do not expect them to be as successful as someone who already has the experience and acumen to do the job on day one.

We are a country of 300+million, and while we would never believe a beat cop should be promoted directly to police chief, we somehow are willing to elect the equivalent to run the largest economy, and be the most powerful person on the planet.
The President of the United States is unlike any other job, period.
Sure, Governors have been elected, but more Senators than Governors have become President. If numbers count, then a Senate seat must be better training than a Governor's office.

President Obama was a State Senator for 11 years before seeking a Congressional Senate seat, and he served as a Senator longer than some others did who became the President.

The fact is the people decide who's ready for the job, period, end of story. Most obviously, experience alone has never been the voter's prime qualification.

If experience was the most important qualification, then we should have seen President Rockefeller, President Thurmond, President Calhoun, or any of a host of others who failed to win election. Any of those 3 had vastly more experience in state and federal politics than most of our Presidents have had.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,795 posts, read 40,994,120 times
Reputation: 62169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
Imagine for a moment that Hilary said "Ahh, screw it!"

What other Democratic candidate would you like to see running in 2016?
Is "The Rent Is Too D*mn High" guy available? He actually has a legitimate issue compared to the imaginary War On Women.

I'd say "Nancy Pelosi" but the Dems already have too many rich old white ladies they're considering. How about some Hollywood actor that played the President on TV or in the movies...and it can't be Morgan Freeman because when the world ends with Iran's nukes, we're going to need him to play God.

But seriously, any successful Democrat governors or former governors out there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 10:46 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post


Ever heard of the word obtuse?

Sure there is no specific requirement to have experience/qualifications to be POTUS beyond what is in the Constitution, and our current POTUS is a perfect example of that.
Yet common sense dictates that you do not take someone out of the mail room and make them a CEO of a Fortune 100 company and expect to be successful.

The best training for a modern president is being a successful governor. Hence why most successful modern presidents have had such experience on their resumes.
Can you take a neophyte and give them on the job training? I guess you can, but do not expect them to be as successful as someone who already has the experience and acumen to do the job on day one.

We are a country of 300+million, and while we would never believe a beat cop should be promoted directly to police chief, we somehow are willing to elect the equivalent to run the largest economy, and be the most powerful person on the planet.
If you dont like Hillary Clinton, then there is no right answer to the question that was posed to the individual you are responding to.

We all realize this is a discussion forum, but there is no need to entertain a debate with someone who isnt debating with honest intentions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top