Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which one do you prefer?
Ben Carson 3 9.09%
Ted Cruz 7 21.21%
Rand Paul 23 69.70%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2015, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Johnson Creek,WI
260 posts, read 218,643 times
Reputation: 188

Advertisements

I am for Walker. If I had to pick one,it would be Cruz. Paul is wrong on foreign policy,voter Id,and a number of issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2015, 06:22 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,327,657 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
Poll for GOP primary voters: which of the three most prominent "anti-establishment" Republican candidates do you prefer?
For people who are so sure that Ted Cruz can't win, you sure are giving him a lot of your attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Canada
6,141 posts, read 3,376,477 times
Reputation: 5790
I sorry..I voted for Rand Paul given the list..BUT I can't vote..so please OP remove my vote..TYIA~~ It didn't stipulate in poll nor in initial post..so I apologize
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 09:02 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,461,674 times
Reputation: 14266
Rand Paul has the best shot of anyone on that list. He didn't fall off the lunatic tree and hit every branch on the way down as hard as the other two.

Ted Cruz is known as the showboater who decided to crash government and risk default on bills in order to pick a fight that everyone knew was unwinnable. Not a person to be taken seriously.

Carson thinks it's a smart idea to go around calling the president a psychopath in media interviews and thinks being gay is a choice because of what some people in prison might do. Not a person to be taken seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 11:21 PM
 
7,542 posts, read 11,583,409 times
Reputation: 4079
Jon Huntsman is the best of the best the republicans have at winning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 06:55 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,327,657 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Ted Cruz is known as the showboater who decided to crash government and risk default on bills in order to pick a fight that everyone knew was unwinnable. Not a person to be taken seriously.
Only by the Liberal insane asylum. There was never a risk of default.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 07:05 AM
 
12,860 posts, read 9,076,133 times
Reputation: 34959
How about none of the above? I have been a life long conservative and none of these guys are conservatives. They are libertarian, almost to being anarchists, who have hidden within the Republican Party because if they went with their true party they couldn't get elected. The true conservative Republican Party has been taken over by an extreme Libertarian wing who uses the RINO tag against everyone who doesn't agree with them.

Bottom line is Bush is damaged goods due to his brother, none of these three clowns is qualified to be President, so if the party keeps heading this way, the only thing going for us true conservatives is the Democrats would run Hillary. Lord, think of that election choice -- Cruz or Hillary? How do you even begin to pick the lesser of two evils there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,888,510 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnff View Post
How about none of the above? I have been a life long conservative and none of these guys are conservatives. They are libertarian, almost to being anarchists, who have hidden within the Republican Party because if they went with their true party they couldn't get elected. The true conservative Republican Party has been taken over by an extreme Libertarian wing who uses the RINO tag against everyone who doesn't agree with them.

Bottom line is Bush is damaged goods due to his brother, none of these three clowns is qualified to be President, so if the party keeps heading this way, the only thing going for us true conservatives is the Democrats would run Hillary. Lord, think of that election choice -- Cruz or Hillary? How do you even begin to pick the lesser of two evils there?
Conservative means less government. How are Cruz and Paul not conservative?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 01:23 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,469,598 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
For people who are so sure that Ted Cruz can't win, you sure are giving him a lot of your attention.
There's a lot of fervor among his supporters on C-D right now, or haven't you noticed?

Are we supposed to ignore him, the same way we're supposed to ignore S*r*h P*l*n?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2015, 04:01 PM
 
12,860 posts, read 9,076,133 times
Reputation: 34959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Conservative means less government. How are Cruz and Paul not conservative?
See, there's part of the problem. Conservative does not mean less government. Conservative means effective government under the Constitution. Doing those things the government is supposed to do to protect the rights of the individuals. Which includes protecting individuals from those who would do them harm. Which also includes the states, as a whole, so that one individual, or group does not dominate, to the detriment of the other states.

Cruz does not care one bit about the rights of the individuals. He and Paul are much closer to the anarchists view of no government restrictions in the land of do as you please, where the strongest dominate.

Look at it this way:

A socialist believes equality means bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.

A liberal believes equality means equal outcomes.

A conservative believes everyone has equal opportunity, but the outcome is up to them.

A libertarian believes "I got mine, the heck with everyone else."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top