Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump said during the Greta Van (whatever) interveiw that he would choose a traditional politician for VP. Many of have said the ideal person would be Rubio, their strengths and weaknesses offset each other well.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
I do not think that is earth shattering news or that much of a prediction it is basic common logic and myself and others have said the same thing. Trump needs a policy wonk and luckily he has 2 that are also in battle ground states Kasich in Ohio and Rubio in Florida. I doubt there is a deal both Kasich and Rubio know if they do not win they are on the short list on who ever does win. During one of the debates Trump pointed to Kasich and said" I am starting to like you better", that is why they are not attacking him and Trump is not attacking them. They all are smart enough to know and figure out the obvious writing on the wall and no special deal is needed.
According to Morning Joe on MSNBC this morning the scuttlebutt is that the reason Rubio isn't attacking Trump is that there is a secret pact between them that Trump is going to ask Rubio to be his VP.....
I am not crazy about Rubio but I think this would get the GOP behind them and make a lot of people vote differently in the election making Trump more palatable for people who once said they would never vote for him.
The scuttlebutt last week was that Rubio was going to have Nikki Haley be HIS VP running mate. The scuttlebutt next week will be..............................
If that's the case, then better Hillary battling a raucous republican-dominated Congress who opposes her tooth and nail for the sake of it (except of course when it comes to screwing average income law-abiding citizens on US soil, where both sides agree 100%, just in different languages), like we've had since 2011, less damage done at a slower pace.
Not optimal, but could be a lot worse, like RINOs in the executive branch with no effective opposition at all in the legislative branch.
That's not what your flip-flopping idol said in one of his many different opinions about the same thing.
But I'm saying it. Due to her ineptitude at diplomacy, Libya was destroyed and left in utter chaos. 1000s of lives lost and now millions of refugees headed to Europe and elsewhere. ISIS operates there without worry.
I don't understand why critically thinking adults would defend & support Clinton's every failure without question.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,445,037 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
But I'm saying it. Due to her ineptitude at diplomacy, Libya was destroyed and left in utter chaos. 1000s of lives lost and now millions of refugees headed to Europe and elsewhere. ISIS operates there without worry.
I don't understand why critically thinking adults would defend & support Clinton's every failure without question.
Nice job of conveniently ignoring the needless invasion/occupation of Iraq that spawned ISIS.
But hang in there, Donny's bound to come around and agree with your opinion, at least for a few minutes now and then.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
GOPe thinks. 
