Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But she is responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of women and children in Iraq and Libya though. And she promises more war with Henry "the Butcher" Kissinger as her close friend and adviser. What's so great about that? Trump is a dove compared to Hillary.
Yes, she's more of a hawk than I'd like. The difference between Clinton and Trump? He's a "hot reactor" and not an especially deep thinker. A lot like W in that respect. When it comes to foreign policy, the reality is that a *touch* of cold and calculated cunning is not out of place.
Kissinger, like Cheney, was a tool that was given too free rein. They are both highly intelligent, but the conscience has to be provided by somebody else.
Gender, attachment to popular former president, promises for free stuff, promises for continuation of BHO policies (maintain status quo - ie Gay, Lesbian, Whatever rights along with other liberal ideals).....I'm not a fan but those are possible reasons why people would consider her.
According to Hillary - White Privilege and Racism and the biggest issues in our country today.
She has to have the Black Vote ........ it is her only chance. The fact that she is a criminal doesn't impact these Lemming Voters at all as long as she screams Racist,Racist,Racist all over the South.
Time will tell if that blind vote will be enough to get her into the Oval Office.
She isn't Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, or Ted Cruz, I think that is a good jumping off spot for any further discussion of the issue.
(PS - thank you for whittling down the candidates, the last time I had to write something like this it took entirely too long.)
For every Hillary supporter I've met and every Hillary supporter on this board, this is the entirety of the discussion. It's never I like Hillary for her stance on such and such
It's she's not a Republican
She's electable
She's experienced.
She doesn't have a real platform, she never really did, she's fluid. That's not necessarily bad, but to me it come across like this:
I am a Progressive who gets things done --Election Season
Sorry we can't do that but let's pass this TPP! It will be good for all. ---President.
I prefer Sanders - he's more liberal and less hawkish -
quick question what does less hawkish mean?
Sanders wants all Americans to succeed. I think he's a better candidate as well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Watching the live feeds and
