Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah. Arpaio and Trump sent their famous investigators out, and are still sure that the truth is out there somewhere...
Maybe but as far as I know Drumph still has his crack team looking for birth certificates or lack thereof. They have lots of things on their to do list. Wall building planning, genitalia measurement, lecturing at Drumph university, checking on Mormon cred for mittens, bankruptcy planning, vetting tanning faculties ahead of visits. So little time. Besides by now the tin foil hat machine of Clinton conspiracies is nearly a perpetual motion device. Need nothing more than a Pavlovian whistle every now and again to keep it churning.
While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton’s three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
So, you are saying that there was a quid pro quo? Moreover, are you also saying there was no reasonable basis for the arms deal? Moreover, moreover, the Clintons don't monetarily gain from donations to the Clinton Foundation.
First, corruption is a crime. There is no evidence that Clinton committed ANY corruption, let alone "a long history" of corruption. Please refrain from throwing out loose unsubstantiated allegations.
Second, there is a great deal of evidence that free trade agreements do much good. At the very worst, there is legitimate argument to their benefit. Blanketing calling them corruption, is absurd.
What I read from this thread is abject desperation to slander Mrs. Clinton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009
Spoken as true liberal. It is simply astonishing that someone would actually contend that Hillary is not corrupt. Amazing, yet predictable.
White Water
Cattle futures
Being dismissed from Watergate
Lewinsky scandal
Bill's serial rapes
Vince Foster
92 suspicious deaths surrounding the Clintons
Chinese donors and White House access
Chinese military tech advanced 25 years through passing info from a Clinton donor
Benghazi
Hillary's brother's business contracts
Email scandal
Webb Hubbel
So, your response to me is first to resort to an ad hominem attack and then post a list of allegations that Mrs. Clinton either had nothing to do with, was cleared or were baseless (and silly) conspiracy theories. If you have some substance, post it -- but just posting "Vince Foster," who committed suicide, means what, exactly? What does Monica Lewinsky have anything to do with Mrs. Clinton's ability to be President? You are really desperately grasping for straws because you know that Republicans can't compete on policy issues, so they have to resort to distracting voters by having them follow the shinny object.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech
So, you are saying that there was a quid pro quo? Moreover, are you also saying there was no reasonable basis for the arms deal? Moreover, moreover, the Clintons don't monetarily gain from donations to the Clinton Foundation.
If there is no reasonable basis for an arms deal, Republicans are perfectly willing to overlook it if the seller issues a simple "Well, I don't remember".
So, you are saying that there was a quid pro quo? Moreover, are you also saying there was no reasonable basis for the arms deal? Moreover, moreover, the Clintons don't monetarily gain from donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Rich people don't always need "monetary gain". Power, influence and favors are worth much more than a bit more money in the bank of millionaires.
Spoken as true liberal. It is simply astonishing that someone would actually contend that Hillary is not corrupt. Amazing, yet predictable.
White Water
Cattle futures
Being dismissed from Watergate
Lewinsky scandal
Bill's serial rapes
Vince Foster
92 suspicious deaths surrounding the Clintons
Chinese donors and White House access
Chinese military tech advanced 25 years through passing info from a Clinton donor
Benghazi
Hillary's brother's business contracts
Email scandal
Webb Hubbel
Haven't all of these things been investigated OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!!!
Enough! Republicans WASTE TOO MUCH TAXPAYER MONEY INVESTIGATING THE CLINTONS! You want to get rid of waste, fraud and abuse? YOU CAN START RIGHT THERE! STOP INVESTIGATING THE CLINTONS!!!!
I'd like to see Congress pass a bill making it ILLEGAL to investigate the Clintons more than once over ANY accusation!
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009
Spoken as true liberal. It is simply astonishing that someone would actually contend that Hillary is not corrupt. Amazing, yet predictable.
White Water
Cattle futures
Being dismissed from Watergate
Lewinsky scandal
Bill's serial rapes
Vince Foster
92 suspicious deaths surrounding the Clintons
Chinese donors and White House access
Chinese military tech advanced 25 years through passing info from a Clinton donor
Benghazi
Hillary's brother's business contracts
Email scandal
Webb Hubbel
Lewinsky scandal?
You mean the private matter Republicans wasted millions of dollars of taxpayer money on to run a lame, failed witch hunt?
You mean the private matter Republicans wasted millions of dollars of taxpayer money on to run a lame, failed witch hunt?
Every one of these investigations has cost MILLIONS of dollars. Look at Benghazi! There have been 8 investigations. I believe it is approaching ONE BILLION dollars just investigating Benghazi. This is RIDICULOUS and it should be criminalized to waste so much money on multiple investigations of the same thing. (This makes me think I should put up a petition on the White House website. I'm sure 100,000 people would agree with me.)
There's NO current candidate, including the alleged outsider Trump, who hasn't played the 'pay for influence' game.
"I'm not alone to do so", "Others do that, too" are the classic last resort response from Clinton when someone points out her inappropriate or criminal acts.
Release your Wall St. speech transcripts.
--"I will if all other candidates do".
It seems she only wants to share the bad things with others.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
